Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Brian, Well, in Japan, blades with a blade length of more than 2.4 inches are regulated. Sode-karami is not regulated. However, it is 6.5 feet long and looks scary, so it is rare for people to like to collect it and keep it at home. If anything, it is considered a "strange person". Therefore, the evaluation of value is low and it is not treated well.

 

Dale, those themes look more like a landscape of Mars than 破墨山水(haboku-sansui = a landscape painting) that an oriental hermit played.

  • Like 1
Posted

That's pretty good. :thumbsup:

The Japanese never thought of castrating horseback riding until they were ridiculed by the British in the 19th century, "I can't believe I'm riding such a beast-like rampage!"
I think the Japanese stirrup is shaped like sandals so that when the horse doesn't follow the instructions, it must be able to jump off immediately.

日本の鐙、洋鐙.jpg

Posted

Yas wrote:

>  I think the Japanese stirrup is shaped like sandals so that when the horse doesn't follow the instructions, it must be able to jump off immediately.

 

Could I suggest that a "sandal" stirrup provides a more stable platform for standing up and shooting arrows even with the horse at gallop??

 

BaZZa.

  • Like 2
Posted

The Japanese stirrup also allows the foot to easily slip out in case of a mishap whereas a European stirrup can sometimes  trap a rider's foot and drag them along the ground even though only the ball of the foot is meant to be on the plate not the instep and certainly not the entire foot in the stirrup.

Many riders have been badly hurt and sometimes killed from brain injuries as a result of being dragged by a bolting horse. Certainly has happened in our community here over the years.

And if the Japanese chose to ride stallions as many macho men did, they can be a weapon in their own right, often enough quite savage and aggressive. A rider might welcome no impediments when coming off a horse in a hurry.

One of the great scenes, shot in the rain, in 'The Seven Samurai' was the war horse kicking out at whoever got in its way- a stallion I imagine. 

Also BaZZa's comment about the Japanese stirrup providing a stable platform for firing arrows etc makes sense. The Parthians, the Romans and the Greeks just hadn't got around to inventing the stirrup in their time.

Maybe I have told you what you already knew ? 

Roger j.

Posted

No doubt very adept archers, even on a galloping horse but for all that it must have been extremely challenging with all that movement going on underneath you, the archer.

As for a Samurai not expected to abandon his mount/his fighting platform, those situations can happen in the blink of an eye, a horse stumbles and off you go, air born . Especially if you are concentrating on your arrow shot, you can be off and down in a moment.

Roger 2

Posted

Judging from the touch of the paint and the color of the pigment, it is certainly due to the same painter.  He drew without thinking about actually attaching the tsuba to the katana.

I found such an item. It seems more difficult to hit than a bow and arrow. I'm wondering if this could be used as a firearm, aside from the stirrup.

https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2021/04/13/double-barreled-stirrup-pistol/

EzF3NcYUUAAIDun.png

EzF3UskUcAYKHjC.png

Posted

Well I don't see that idea being too good for the horse! He either gets shot in the leg or he bolts and throws the rider - and just how do you aim it without falling out the saddle or blowing your own toes off? :laughing:

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Yas, I saw those, the one with the broken head has been cleaned up but not repaired. It is funny that a clean up can earn three times what he paid for it. The unfinished one [or hobby piece] was selling back in December 2020 for 15,000 yen, it is back at a cheaper starting price. I just received an unusual double rain dragon, that adds to my collection of four single dragon examples - very pleased with it. [My double was only 12,000yen and not damaged]

image.thumb.png.585f2839f74fafecc73e1dd8aed92191.png

  • Like 1
Posted

For Apr.

The staple products.

 

https://www.jauce.com/auction/j723046718

https://www.jauce.com/auction/n460821641

https://www.jauce.com/auction/o467624970

https://www.jauce.com/auction/c903087381

https://www.jauce.com/auction/w466484297

https://www.jauce.com/auction/s814150095

https://www.jauce.com/auction/l669252836

https://www.jauce.com/auction/x773571678

 

It is confidently lined up with the sample, but there is much room for debate just by comparing the two signatures.
https://www.jauce.com/auction/q432923316

 

The lotus-leaf pattern, which was the specialty of Shoami-Denbey in Akita and Tachibana-Takaie in Morioka, is also a standard product of cast reproductions.
https://www.jauce.com/auction/v770491209

 

This tiger pattern looks like an inlay and is quite skillful. However, the splashes are just gold painted on the ground iron.

https://www.jauce.com/auction/b549081380

 

I thought that Masachika's tiger, which is mentioned in Dr. Torigoe's book, was philosophical and nihilistic.

reference sample

https://matsukaze.thebase.in/items/9814604

 

In addition to casting burrs, there are areas where nanako is not uniform. Nanako, which is engraved one by one or in units of several, is less sensitive to uneven surfaces.
https://www.jauce.com/auction/q442624655

reference sample

http://ginza.choshuya.co.jp/sale/gj/r2/09/09_satsuma_tsuba.htm

 

These may be castings or die-cut from steel plates. The details are different, but they are repeatedly exhibited and should be avoided.
https://www.jauce.com/auction/c897140821

https://www.jauce.com/auction/k476029332

https://www.jauce.com/auction/n459975707

 

大森波縁頭 銘 大森英秀(花押).jpg

フェイク蕗図鍔 長州萩住久次作銘 銘 橘孝家(遠野城下町資料館).jpg

龍虎図鍔 銘 昌親(花押).jpg

虎図鍔 銘 昌親.jpg

潜龍図鍔.jpg

砂潜龍図鐔 無銘 薩摩.jpg

窓桐透図鍔.jpg

五輪塔鎌倉鍔(mwmwcrown & chitose_30san).jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

Yas you are the king of spotting fakes. :thumbsup:

 

 

I have to confess I do have a terracotta plant pot I am fond of.

image.thumb.png.500502693dcebc6f25c9fa1ba0fed035.png

I have to show this - taking a hobby far too seriously - and why choose this design? [the tsuba is genuine I think, not one of the countless cast fakes] The tattoo, really bad fake!

Are they 'Man Boobs' on the tattoo frog? And a belly button?  - very anatomically WRONG!

 

frog tat.jpg

Posted

That auction says "rare item" - not rare enough, someone paid very much over the value of that cast fake. Check the nakago-ana with the ones in my picture - identical.

My pictures are at least five years ago, and I have seen plenty more since. Yas I would say the tattoo is even worse than the fakes.

smile froggy smile.jpg

Posted

That's right. These frogs are mass-produced and are often the doppelganger brothers I see in the market.
I think that the frog has a prototype somewhere, just as the oni-tsuba originated from the Mito school. However, I am not sure about the school of design.

鬼図鍔 原型と複製群(『銕の意匠』より).jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...