Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am with Jacques on this one, its sugata is not right and there is nothing there to indicate Heian period,no gracefulness,fumbari .....Nothing.

I very much doubt that the blade would take another polish and not get worse in that area and it would worry me immensly with openings like that for that sum.I saw it and dismissed it in the first 20 seconds.

The seller is optimistic about date and value as he is in most of the things he is saying and selling IMHO.This is just a gut feeling mind you as i know little or nothing about this sort of thing.

I think Jacques has a heian period blade or two so i would trust his opinion.

Kindest regards

shan.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Hello All, I agre that the sugata is not what you would expect from Heian period tachi, the kissaki is too long as well. I think that that the hi should have been deeper on the nakago if thw sword is realy o-o-suriage as the seller says, nodachi could have 90 cm blade and up, do IMHO it might be older sword but not Heian. Mike

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...