Jump to content

Okimitsu blade (Gendaito). Info? Polish?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

 

I picked up a signed katana blade yesterday at the Louisville show, out of polished and lightly rusted all over (black rust) for $200. With help from Mr. Moriyama, I was able to find out that the me reads:

 

"Oki no kuni ju Okimitsu saku"

made in: "Showa era, 18th year, 10th month" (1943).

 

My blade looks almost exactly like this one in terms of sugata, signature, hamon, etc. besides the two-month age difference and, of course, the condition:

okimitsuqa6.jpg

http://www.nihontoantiques.com/g83.htm

 

 

I am wondering if anybody can give me any further information about my blade and this smith. Is he the same entity as Hara Okimitsu I, the Jo Saku WWII era smith?

 

Furthermore, do you think it is worth sending for a polish, based on it's merit? (I am sorry I do not have photos, but I hope to post some shortly.)

Posted

Yep, if you only paid $200, and it is a nice Gendaito, then it might be worth spending the money on.

This depends on the condition and any flaws. If it were mine, I would get it to a togishi for a window and opinion on whether it will be economically restorable.

If in the USA, how about asking Jon Bowhay if he does this and can give you an opinion?

 

Brian

Posted

All sound advice. It would be prudent to pursue it further. Contact Mr. Bowhay through the PM function of this board and ask him if he'd have a look at it.

 

Gendaito were overlooked for a long time, and many are fantastic works. The fact that you might have a nice example and acquired it a price that could enable you to have it properly restored is all the better. Most times, folks buy into pieces that need restoration at a price that doesn't leave room to spend the money to have the polish done, so they end up going without.

 

Good luck and keep us informed of what happens!

Posted

Following are some more photos of the blade itself:

 

img3298ck2.jpg

img3299sg4.jpg

what first attracted me to the blade was the deep sori.

 

img3306wy0.jpg

The only noticeable chips in the ha occur in the kissaki, and even here they are very small.

 

img3309ig3.jpg

the shinogi-ji seems to be okay. Notice traces of the hamon in the lower-left. The entire hamon can be seen under certain lighting conditions, but I have not been able to capture that on camera. The existing hamon looks almost exactly like the Okimitsu blade in my above post.

 

img3315rg5.jpg

The nagako.

Posted

img3317te1.jpg

 

img3321zu8.jpg

 

img3323da2.jpg

This up-close photo shows the worst of the blade's surface damage. This--in varying degrees--is representative of the blade's all-over condition.

 

 

Judging from the photos, are there any additional or new thoughts/opinions about this piece?

 

thanks,

Posted

The above attachement is from Gendai Toko Meikan and gives information about Okimitsu II, son of Okimitsu I. I have a star stamped blade by Okimitsu I and he was indeed a fine gendai sword smith. He learned to forge swords from Murakami Masatada who was a student of Kajiyama Yasutoku, one of the Yasukuni shrine smiths. To the best of my knowledge, the first generation Okimitsu used kiri yasurime with sujikai yasuri on the mune and ha edge. From the photos in Gendai Toko Meikan, it appears his son, Okimitsu II, used keso style yasuri. His son did help his father with sword forging during WWII and perhaps also made blades during that time period though he would have been a teen ager at the time if I'm not mistaken. Your $200 sword should look great in full polish and well worth the effort.

Ed Harbualk

Posted

Difficult to tell how deep the pitting is from photos.

Were the blade mine, I'd send it to Chris Osborne for his assessment and to polish a window. Chris is an unrecognized talent that has done good work for me.

Personally, I love to visualize the potential within an abused/neglected blade. It's like a treasure hunt!

  • 1 month later...
Posted
  slavia631 said:
img3317te1.jpg

 

img3321zu8.jpg

 

img3323da2.jpg

This up-close photo shows the worst of the blade's surface damage. This--in varying degrees--is representative of the blade's all-over condition.

 

 

Judging from the photos, are there any additional or new thoughts/opinions about this piece?

 

thanks,

 

This sword demonstrates symptoms of being exposed to heat imo. Let's hope not.

  • 1 year later...
  • 3 months later...
Posted

Hi Stephen. Unfortunately I haven't gotten to this blade yet. My father's health took a turn for the worse about 8 months back which ultimately led to his passing three weeks ago. He had Parkinson's and required around the clock care. Needless to say I've gotten very behind on my polishing work as a consequence. Things are looking up however and I'm beginning to get back into a normal routine. Hopefully Slavia will have some pics to show in the next couple of months.

 

Chris

  • 3 months later...
  • 1 year later...
Posted

Some years ago I had a sword by Okimitsu {From OKI Island?}, it was a stonkingly well made blade and broke me old heart that just above the kissaki was a large rust lump, when removed it had eaten right through up into the Ji....the rest of the blade was in good order.

Was in those days{Pre web} unable to find much about the smith but it was obvious even to a relative new comer to Nihonto that it was far superior to many Gendaito I had seen.

Well done,another saved.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...