Greg F Posted February 4, 2020 Report Posted February 4, 2020 Brian regardless off the hada name its nice and its great you feel a conection, congratulations. Greg Quote
Ed Posted February 5, 2020 Report Posted February 5, 2020 This presents a good educational opportunity for all, two things of note: 1. The hada seen on this sword is NOT Ayasugi. It is Itame with Mokume as stated on the papers. 2. Jussi pointed this out, but I would reiterate this sword is papered to "Den" Gassan Chikanori, not directly to him. 2 Quote
Rivkin Posted February 5, 2020 Report Posted February 5, 2020 Gassan Chikanori is not supposed to be pure ayasugi, but rather ayasugi that appears in small parts of the blade, like one sees in Houju. In NTHK definition Gassan Chikanori especially is basically late Muromachi blades which exhibit high contrast hada, weak hamon and some evidence of something that looks ayasugi.NBTHK papers would typically yield a different name, though equally vague; Fuyuhiro is a common NBTHK counterpart attribution.Both are not particularly supported by signed blades. Kirill R. 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.