jmpainter Posted September 20, 2008 Report Posted September 20, 2008 I've been given a translation to the Mei FUKUOKA JÛ ROKURÔZAEMON no JÔ HIROMITSU One side of the Tsuba looked to me like a reference to Fishing which would go along with Fukuoka. I wonder also though if it is a Rokurozaemon reference The other side of the Tsuba looks like Four Volcanoes. A reference to the Mount Aso Range? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Aso I would like to learn more about the age of this sword. Any ideas? THANKS!!! Quote
Nobody Posted September 20, 2008 Report Posted September 20, 2008 This is my guess without concrete evidences. I think that the smith could be the father of Kajiwara Hiromitsu (梶原廣光). Kajiwara Hiromitsu was a WWII smith in Fukuoka. According to the information on the web page below, his father was also a sword smith and the father’s smith name was Rokuro Hiromitsu (å…郎廣光). http://www.sanmei.com/shop_e/media/I108 ... _PUP_E.htm Quote
jmpainter Posted September 20, 2008 Author Report Posted September 20, 2008 Interesting....do you think the Tsuba is really that "young" though? The edges are very hammered. There is a little inlay on the tops of the "Volcanoes" and the Spear (if that is what it is). Also maybe another color of inlay on the man. In other details...the Butt End is Kengyo. The Blade is about 68cm The Tip is O-Kissaki The File marks seem Sujikai except there is some crosshatch pattern where the File marks also go in the opposite direction. Also..the placement of the Mei is Katana-Mei? The Hamon is fairly straight with a flare up on occasion. I haven't studied it closely. Unfortunately I think the edge has been ground by a knife sharpener Was wondering if there is a way to 'bring back' the Hamon. THANKS for your expertise. This is a great forum John Quote
jmpainter Posted September 20, 2008 Author Report Posted September 20, 2008 I took a few more photos. Here is the Blade shape Here is what is left of the Hamon Quote
Brian Posted September 20, 2008 Report Posted September 20, 2008 John, The tsuba will usually have very little to do with the blade, and due to the amount of times fittings were changed, are usually from a different period. In this case, it looks like the tsuba might be older than the blade which happened often with remounts. Brian Quote
Ford Hallam Posted September 20, 2008 Report Posted September 20, 2008 The "volcano's" on the reverse of the tsuba are most likely fishing nets set out to dry. The little chap on the front is a fisherman pulling a net in. A famous print by Hokusai showing a fisherman hauling in his nets... and this print by Hiroshige shows some nets drying ...and while I hate to be the "bad cop" but is it only me who thinks this mei is a bit "wobbly" ? :? Quote
jmpainter Posted September 20, 2008 Author Report Posted September 20, 2008 The engraving on the Mei is quite deep if that tells you anything. The only Mei I have ever seen in person were of the REALLY sloppy variety on factory Gunto so my frame of reference isn't so good. I love the "Fishing Nets" painting. I don't know if you can see it well in the photo but the top right of that side of the Tsuba has kind of a Dragon looking figure on it as well. There is a bit of inlay on that bit too but it is hard to see it unless I remove some rust. john Quote
Stephen Posted September 20, 2008 Report Posted September 20, 2008 the first mei is reversed so it does seem out of whack, lower shot looks confident to me. Quote
Brian Posted September 21, 2008 Report Posted September 21, 2008 Lol..good catch Stephen :D A mirror image..yep. (Wierd camera or too much photoshop? ) Moriyama san seems to have it as usual. Maybe a WW2 gendaito. Needs a polisher to do a window to see what lies underneath and see what the hamon and hada if any looks like. Tsuba and cord are fairly irrelevant as they are added at some stage, maybe during WW2 and not original to the sword as first made. Brian Quote
jmpainter Posted September 21, 2008 Author Report Posted September 21, 2008 RE: The mirror image... There was a goofy "Flip Image" command in Photobucket. It SHOULD have been fixed but I do know the original post was flipped. Just in the interest of getting images correct (which is pretty important in this case!) try reloading the page and/or emptying your Browser Cache and then reload. It is displaying correctly on my Computers and my Phone. Thanks John Quote
Ford Hallam Posted September 21, 2008 Report Posted September 21, 2008 I wasn't referring to the first image being flipped. The second image clearly shows a number of very obvious errors and sloppy stroke alignments. The actually punch marks look very hesitant and irregular to my eye. Could this be evidence that whoever made the mei hadn't had much practice? Quote
jmpainter Posted September 21, 2008 Author Report Posted September 21, 2008 If it helps, I have a better closeup of the Hamon and Grain One other clue is the Flare at the Kissaki. And a closer Crop of the Boshi Quote
Ford Hallam Posted September 21, 2008 Report Posted September 21, 2008 Quote the Flare at the Kissaki. which is a good indicator of the blade being a gendaito....I don't think the blade itself is in question. My hesitancy is with reference to the mei. My contention is that it is a fairly recent, and spurious, addition. Ford Quote
jmpainter Posted September 21, 2008 Author Report Posted September 21, 2008 I first saw the sword in 1990. There was a pretty thick layer of rust on the Mei and the Tsuba. The Mei was very hard to read and the engraving on the Tsuba wasn't apparent...unless you were looking for it you wouldn't even have noticed it. The Rust was dark brown/red. My friend cleaned it off to better see the Mei. jmp Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.