Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been given a translation to the Mei

JapaneseSword006-1.jpg

FUKUOKA JÛ ROKURÔZAEMON no JÔ HIROMITSU

 

One side of the Tsuba looked to me like a reference to Fishing which would go along with Fukuoka. I wonder also though if it is a Rokurozaemon reference

JapaneseSword003.jpg

 

The other side of the Tsuba looks like Four Volcanoes. A reference to the Mount Aso Range? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Aso JapaneseSword002.jpg

 

I would like to learn more about the age of this sword.

Any ideas?

 

THANKS!!!

 

 

JapaneseSword004.jpg

JapaneseSword007.jpg

JapaneseSword005.jpg

Posted

This is my guess without concrete evidences.

 

I think that the smith could be the father of Kajiwara Hiromitsu (梶原廣光). Kajiwara Hiromitsu was a WWII smith in Fukuoka. According to the information on the web page below, his father was also a sword smith and the father’s smith name was Rokuro Hiromitsu (六郎廣光).

http://www.sanmei.com/shop_e/media/I108 ... _PUP_E.htm

Posted

Interesting....do you think the Tsuba is really that "young" though?

The edges are very hammered. There is a little inlay on the tops of the "Volcanoes" and the Spear (if that is what it is). Also maybe another color of inlay on the man.

 

In other details...the Butt End is Kengyo.

The Blade is about 68cm

The Tip is O-Kissaki

The File marks seem Sujikai except there is some crosshatch pattern where the File marks also go in the opposite direction.

 

Also..the placement of the Mei is Katana-Mei?

 

The Hamon is fairly straight with a flare up on occasion.

I haven't studied it closely. Unfortunately I think the edge has been ground by a knife sharpener :(

Was wondering if there is a way to 'bring back' the Hamon.

 

THANKS for your expertise.

This is a great forum

 

John

Posted

John,

The tsuba will usually have very little to do with the blade, and due to the amount of times fittings were changed, are usually from a different period. In this case, it looks like the tsuba might be older than the blade which happened often with remounts.

 

Brian

Posted

The "volcano's" on the reverse of the tsuba are most likely fishing nets set out to dry. The little chap on the front is a fisherman pulling a net in.

A famous print by Hokusai showing a fisherman hauling in his nets...

 

and this print by Hiroshige shows some nets drying

 

 

...and while I hate to be the "bad cop" but is it only me who thinks this mei is a bit "wobbly" ? :?

post-229-14196750846328_thumb.jpg

post-229-14196750847481_thumb.jpg

Posted

The engraving on the Mei is quite deep if that tells you anything.

The only Mei I have ever seen in person were of the REALLY sloppy variety on factory Gunto so my frame of reference isn't so good.

 

I love the "Fishing Nets" painting.

I don't know if you can see it well in the photo but the top right of that side of the Tsuba has kind of a Dragon looking figure on it as well.

There is a bit of inlay on that bit too but it is hard to see it unless I remove some rust.

 

john

Posted

Lol..good catch Stephen :D A mirror image..yep. (Wierd camera or too much photoshop? :glee: )

Moriyama san seems to have it as usual. Maybe a WW2 gendaito. Needs a polisher to do a window to see what lies underneath and see what the hamon and hada if any looks like.

Tsuba and cord are fairly irrelevant as they are added at some stage, maybe during WW2 and not original to the sword as first made.

 

Brian

Posted

RE: The mirror image...

 

There was a goofy "Flip Image" command in Photobucket.

It SHOULD have been fixed but I do know the original post was flipped.

 

Just in the interest of getting images correct (which is pretty important in this case!) try reloading the page and/or emptying your Browser Cache and then reload.

 

It is displaying correctly on my Computers and my Phone.

 

Thanks

John

Posted

I wasn't referring to the first image being flipped. The second image clearly shows a number of very obvious errors and sloppy stroke alignments. The actually punch marks look very hesitant and irregular to my eye. Could this be evidence that whoever made the mei hadn't had much practice?

Posted
the Flare at the Kissaki.

 

which is a good indicator of the blade being a gendaito....I don't think the blade itself is in question. My hesitancy is with reference to the mei. My contention is that it is a fairly recent, and spurious, addition.

 

 

Ford

Posted

I first saw the sword in 1990. There was a pretty thick layer of rust on the Mei and the Tsuba. The Mei was very hard to read and the engraving on the Tsuba wasn't apparent...unless you were looking for it you wouldn't even have noticed it.

 

The Rust was dark brown/red. My friend cleaned it off to better see the Mei.

 

jmp

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...