Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Howzit guys.

 

Nice finding Ed..   :)

What a treasure that someone is selling.

 

I , and, I'm sure others, would have loved to see the foot (Kodai).

 

 

Hey ,  SteveM..  :)  appurtenance translation  please..  :clap:

 

Had the other early Edo Oribe for 4500 from Cab.  :o

Added:

 

Just seen Steve's post.. I did not think of that.. Momoyama..  That's cheap for Momoyama.

Looks like mid Edo.. 

 

I forgot, Thanks for posting Ed.. :)

Posted

Steve,

I can't authenticate that it is a Momoyama period Chawan, but as you saw the Hakogaki says Momoyama.  It is an extremely nice bowl, that I would have been happy to have regardless.  I put in a bid of what I mistakenly thought was substantial.  When I checked on it again, I was not even close.  :shock:  

 

 

post-10-0-46965700-1575673066_thumb.jpg

post-10-0-27010200-1575673082_thumb.jpg

post-10-0-02885200-1575673093_thumb.jpg

post-10-0-17522400-1575673286_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi Ed,

 

I know the feeling.  All too well.  My sympathies.  There was a Yamakichibei tsuba up for auction once.  A really good one.  I put a really good bid on it, which turned out to be laughably inadequate (it ended at over a million yen, just as this chawan did).  

 

This bowl does seem to be a worthy piece all right (would still like to see photos of the rim, though, as well as to know the dimensions, as later "homage" works are often significantly smaller than the real thing).  Thanks for these extra photos.  Actual Period Kuro-Oribe chawan available for acquisition are very rarely encountered, in my experience. 

 

Thanks for posting this, Ed. :thumbsup:

 

Cheers,

 

Steve

  • Like 2
Posted

I guess the dimensions are those marked in the last photo above, 7.5x13.8x11.9. Is this what you would expect for the real thing?

 

Cheers, Pietro

 

P.S. may I ask again who was selling this beautiful (and expensive) chawan?

Posted

Yes, I felt that I bid as much as I could justify without more proof it was a Momoyama period bowl.  Again, I found very aesthetically pleasing to the eye, but without recourse where do you draw the line????  Obviously others were waaay more convinced than I.

 

The dimensions are in the last photo in the first group of photos.

 

Here are a few photos of the rim.

post-10-0-23298300-1575749846_thumb.jpg

post-10-0-28152100-1575749854_thumb.jpg

post-10-0-80898100-1575749865_thumb.jpg

post-10-0-84656500-1575749873_thumb.jpg

post-10-0-70118900-1575749883_thumb.jpg

post-10-0-37437700-1575749892_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Ah, yes, I hadn't scrolled down far enough to catch the dimensions.  Thanks, Pietro. ;-)   Yes, these dimensions are in keeping with what I would expect from an actual period bowl.  Revival works usually have a smaller diameter across the rim, often 12cm or less.  All considered --including photos of the rim (thanks for these, Ed) -- and working only from photos, I would say with some if not full confidence that this is a Momoyama Period work.  Beautiful chawan. 

 

A couple of years ago, there was another Momoyama Kuro-Oribe chawan that went for nearly 3.5 million yen.  It was spectacular.  Kind of amazing they're ever available at all, really...

 

Cheers,

 

Steve

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I remember watching this for a few days and kept going back and forth on my confidence level of it being true Momoyama/early Edo. Forgot to check back on the result until I stumbled across this thread, and with a 1.5M Yen sale price it's probably legit lol.

 

Beautiful bowl. However not what I'd consider to be near the pinnacle of this style personally, which says a lot re the kind of bankroll it takes to land one.

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...