Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Even though the pictures aren't the best, I've always enjoyed HA for the quality items they have!

 

I missed out last December when they had a nice Koto Bizen daito in Gunto mounts. Forgor to put my max bid as 1000 and it sold as such. :(

Posted

They are not bad for me. Click the pic, it opens to a larger one that you can zoom in on, or change the brightness. Not Darcy-style pics, but not terrible.

Posted

No. He is the submitter. Some owners prefer not to have their names on the papers and you see the dealers or their representatives on the papers. Sometimes the dealers own the blades before they have sold them and their name appears on the papers.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

The "Sadakazu" is signed with a different mei so would not pass a kantei paper unless the mei is removed and then hope. Probably partly explain its low value too but the horimono is superb.

  • Like 1
Posted

If you are talking about the blade with the Ranma Sukashi horimono that was said to have a spurious signature to Yukinaga, well it did have a paper that wasn’t added with the piece as did several of the items. I am not sure who did the actual write ups, but boy were they way off. This collection was from an old client who had me certify several of the items, that being said, items were mis handled, mis represented and terrible pics making it a good shopping day for alot of people. ???? M Yamasaki

  • Like 1
Posted

I am curious what others thought of the 'Inoue Shinkai'. The sword had NTHK papers and it appeared to have previous sold for $35,000. It sat on the Heritage website with a $4,250 Buy It Now price for weeks after the auction. To my eyes it appeared to be gimei, and was dated months before this smith was believed to have changed his mei to Shinkai.

 

post-457-0-41795400-1577979218.jpgpost-457-0-77704800-1577979159_thumb.pngpost-457-0-37742800-1577979163_thumb.jpegpost-457-0-86523600-1577979166_thumb.jpegpost-457-0-24316900-1577979170_thumb.jpegpost-457-0-22689300-1577979174_thumb.jpeg

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

Mr Chan,

There was a thin katana signed Gassan Sadakazu, butit had no certificate. This blade is a daisaku mei by Sadakatsu and is considered acceptable. In the future please post the catalog number to avoid confusion. This signed Sadakazu is item 40039

Posted

Mr Chan,

Item # 40042 is a katana actually signed by Yukinobu and HAS a kanteisho. It is not a spurious signature on a blade by Sadakazu. I do not know who did this description, but it is totally inaccurate in my opinion.

M.

Posted

I am curious what others thought of the 'Inoue Shinkai'. The sword had NTHK papers and it appeared to have previous sold for $35,000. It sat on the Heritage website with a $4,250 Buy It Now price for weeks after the auction. To my eyes it appeared to be gimei, and was dated months before this smith was believed to have changed his mei to Shinkai.

 

attachicon.gifPSX_20191210_190803.jpgattachicon.gifimage.pngattachicon.giflf (2).jpegattachicon.giflf (3).jpegattachicon.giflf (4).jpegattachicon.giflf (5).jpeg

If this was a genuine Shinkai, it would have been purchased, even with its current npo certificate there was no confidence in the bidding.

  • Like 2
Posted

I bought a tanto post auction from this sale. The blade was actually more interesting in hand than in the auction photos. Unfortunately it had also acquired 2 fingerprints, one on each side, as if someone held it btwn thumb and forefinger. I tried unsuccessfully to remove the prints with a soft cloth, and wound up returning the tanto.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

FYI: Just saw this posted on Facebook (TETSUGENDO Mr. Mike Yamasaki)

 

Tetsugendo.com
53 mins · 
I just recently heard about a strange rumor. Apparently, because of a person who went bankrupt recently sold their sword collection on the Heritage Auction site, the rumor mill said it was my items.
To be clear, this collection was once the property of a California collector that went bankrupt, I did run several items through shinsa for this person, thus my familiarity of the items, in fact I purchased some myself very happily.
So yes, still in business and still kicking!
Some people have nothing better to do than spread negative feelings and false rumors just because their own lives have no meaning.
  • Like 1
Posted

Saw that. But those who know Mike or his posts here would have known there is no truth to that anyways. I didn't hear the rumour myself.
 

Posted

His name was listed on at least one set of papers.  Apparently Mike submitted them but was not the owner/seller.   The rest was probably somebody embellishing the facts.  

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...