Brian Posted December 4, 2019 Report Posted December 4, 2019 LOTS of goodies, maybe around 70 swords?Beware, the descriptions have lots of mistakes. But there may be some decent deals to be had.Oh I wish I had money!Couple of highlights:https://historical.ha.com/itm/edged-weapons/a-very-rare-and-important-triple-maker-juyo-shinto-katana-by-masateru-kaneshige-and-kanetsune-with-original-gold-cutting-test/a/6217-40050.s?ic5=CatalogHome-MostPopular-Thumbnail-112917https://historical.ha.com/itm/edged-weapons/a-unique-shin-shinto-o-tanto-by-katsushige/a/6217-40008.s?ic4=GalleryView-Thumbnail-071515 https://historical.ha.com/itm/edged-weapons/a-very-fine-shin-shinto-wakizashi-by-enju-kunihide-with-superb-horimono/a/6217-40016.s?ic4=GalleryView-ShortDescription-071515 https://historical.ha.com/itm/edged-weapons/a-fine-and-rare-signed-and-dated-wakizashi-by-inoue-shinkai/a/6217-40023.s?ic4=GalleryView-ShortDescription-071515 https://historical.ha.com/itm/edged-weapons/a-very-fine-and-rare-shin-shinto-daisho-with-both-blades-by-enomoto-sadayoshi-in-soft-metal-daisho-mounts-total-4-items-/a/6217-40033.s?ic4=GalleryView-ShortDescription-071515 https://historical.ha.com/itm/edged-weapons/a-shin-shinto-o-katana-by-gassan-sadakazu-copying-a-koto-katana-now-spurious-signed-ukifusa-with-superbly-chiseled-gassan-pier/a/6217-40042.s?ic4=GalleryView-ShortDescription-071515 Quote
Ken-Hawaii Posted December 4, 2019 Report Posted December 4, 2019 Whew! 25% buyer's premium is pretty steep. Couple of nice blades, though. Quote
Death-Ace Posted December 5, 2019 Report Posted December 5, 2019 Even though the pictures aren't the best, I've always enjoyed HA for the quality items they have! I missed out last December when they had a nice Koto Bizen daito in Gunto mounts. Forgor to put my max bid as 1000 and it sold as such. Quote
lonely panet Posted December 5, 2019 Report Posted December 5, 2019 Why are there photos so low quality. Would like to think I might bid on 1 or 2 items but at those poor resolution. Going to stay away 1 Quote
Ruroni_Kenshin Posted December 5, 2019 Report Posted December 5, 2019 Why are the pictures so bad? Blown out. You can’t even see the Hamon clearly. Why do most only have 2 pictures? Quote
Brian Posted December 5, 2019 Author Report Posted December 5, 2019 They are not bad for me. Click the pic, it opens to a larger one that you can zoom in on, or change the brightness. Not Darcy-style pics, but not terrible. Quote
Surfson Posted December 5, 2019 Report Posted December 5, 2019 I noticed Mike Yamazaki (sic) as the owner on the papers for one of the blades. Is this collection from Mike? Quote
Gakusee Posted December 5, 2019 Report Posted December 5, 2019 No. He is the submitter. Some owners prefer not to have their names on the papers and you see the dealers or their representatives on the papers. Sometimes the dealers own the blades before they have sold them and their name appears on the papers. Quote
Surfson Posted December 6, 2019 Report Posted December 6, 2019 Thanks Michael. Do you specifically know about the source of this collection? Quote
Mark Posted December 31, 2019 Report Posted December 31, 2019 what do NMB's think about the outcome of the auction? I thought a lot of items went for much less than i would have expected Quote
Gakusee Posted December 31, 2019 Report Posted December 31, 2019 There were two or three great items which went for much less than they were worth. I know the buyers and well done to them - got great items Quote
Stephen Posted December 31, 2019 Report Posted December 31, 2019 Heard the same some very good deals at half the value. Quote
PNSSHOGUN Posted January 1, 2020 Report Posted January 1, 2020 Some absolute steals, Gassan Sadakazu for $4500...... Quote
w.y.chan Posted January 1, 2020 Report Posted January 1, 2020 The "Sadakazu" is signed with a different mei so would not pass a kantei paper unless the mei is removed and then hope. Probably partly explain its low value too but the horimono is superb. 1 Quote
raiden Posted January 2, 2020 Report Posted January 2, 2020 If you are talking about the blade with the Ranma Sukashi horimono that was said to have a spurious signature to Yukinaga, well it did have a paper that wasn’t added with the piece as did several of the items. I am not sure who did the actual write ups, but boy were they way off. This collection was from an old client who had me certify several of the items, that being said, items were mis handled, mis represented and terrible pics making it a good shopping day for alot of people. ???? M Yamasaki 1 Quote
Vermithrax16 Posted January 2, 2020 Report Posted January 2, 2020 I didn't see much worth chasing, but bad pics and poor descriptions will do that. Quote
w.y.chan Posted January 2, 2020 Report Posted January 2, 2020 So "Yukinaga" was the correct attribution as in the mei not "Sadakazu" as in the write-up? Quote
Ray Singer Posted January 2, 2020 Report Posted January 2, 2020 I am curious what others thought of the 'Inoue Shinkai'. The sword had NTHK papers and it appeared to have previous sold for $35,000. It sat on the Heritage website with a $4,250 Buy It Now price for weeks after the auction. To my eyes it appeared to be gimei, and was dated months before this smith was believed to have changed his mei to Shinkai. 2 Quote
raiden Posted January 2, 2020 Report Posted January 2, 2020 Mr Chan, There was a thin katana signed Gassan Sadakazu, butit had no certificate. This blade is a daisaku mei by Sadakatsu and is considered acceptable. In the future please post the catalog number to avoid confusion. This signed Sadakazu is item 40039 Quote
raiden Posted January 2, 2020 Report Posted January 2, 2020 Mr Chan, Item # 40042 is a katana actually signed by Yukinobu and HAS a kanteisho. It is not a spurious signature on a blade by Sadakazu. I do not know who did this description, but it is totally inaccurate in my opinion. M. Quote
raiden Posted January 2, 2020 Report Posted January 2, 2020 I am curious what others thought of the 'Inoue Shinkai'. The sword had NTHK papers and it appeared to have previous sold for $35,000. It sat on the Heritage website with a $4,250 Buy It Now price for weeks after the auction. To my eyes it appeared to be gimei, and was dated months before this smith was believed to have changed his mei to Shinkai. PSX_20191210_190803.jpgimage.pnglf (2).jpeglf (3).jpeglf (4).jpeglf (5).jpeg If this was a genuine Shinkai, it would have been purchased, even with its current npo certificate there was no confidence in the bidding. 2 Quote
Ray Singer Posted January 2, 2020 Report Posted January 2, 2020 That was my thought as well Mike. I was glad to see that people had clearly done their own research, rather than simply buying based on the papers. 1 Quote
Tigerinbamboo Posted January 3, 2020 Report Posted January 3, 2020 I bought a tanto post auction from this sale. The blade was actually more interesting in hand than in the auction photos. Unfortunately it had also acquired 2 fingerprints, one on each side, as if someone held it btwn thumb and forefinger. I tried unsuccessfully to remove the prints with a soft cloth, and wound up returning the tanto. Quote
Tigerinbamboo Posted January 3, 2020 Report Posted January 3, 2020 It was lot 40026, the Fuyuhiro kaiken tanto. Quote
w.y.chan Posted January 3, 2020 Report Posted January 3, 2020 Thanks for clearing that up Mike. I just clicked on the link posted by Brian. Quote
ilikesword Posted February 7, 2020 Report Posted February 7, 2020 FYI: Just saw this posted on Facebook (TETSUGENDO Mr. Mike Yamasaki) Tetsugendo.com 53 mins · I just recently heard about a strange rumor. Apparently, because of a person who went bankrupt recently sold their sword collection on the Heritage Auction site, the rumor mill said it was my items. To be clear, this collection was once the property of a California collector that went bankrupt, I did run several items through shinsa for this person, thus my familiarity of the items, in fact I purchased some myself very happily. So yes, still in business and still kicking! Some people have nothing better to do than spread negative feelings and false rumors just because their own lives have no meaning. 1 Quote
Brian Posted February 7, 2020 Author Report Posted February 7, 2020 Saw that. But those who know Mike or his posts here would have known there is no truth to that anyways. I didn't hear the rumour myself. Quote
Surfson Posted February 7, 2020 Report Posted February 7, 2020 His name was listed on at least one set of papers. Apparently Mike submitted them but was not the owner/seller. The rest was probably somebody embellishing the facts. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.