tokashikibob Posted September 13, 2019 Report Posted September 13, 2019 Ryuuichi Yokoyama When I was told I was off for the South, I bought a military sword. I was surprised how expensive it was. I hung it from my belt in a leather scabbard, but it dragged along the ground because I’m so short. I had to have the sword cut down, but when I went to a shop outside the Azabu regimental base, they were going to cut off the tang, which bore the swordmaker’s name. I shouted, “Hey! Please leave that on. I paid a lot of money for that sword! The smith just snorted, “Showa swords don’t have names of importance,” and cut right through. So much for my great weapon! I had that sword hanging on the wall of a gymnasium in a school on Taiwan where we stopped off for a month or so on our way to the South. A member of my unit a kendo master from Kyushu, told me “Yokoyama, you have to take care of your blade.” The sword was in a white wooden sheath, and wrapped in a leather scabbard. It looked great from the outside. But after he said that, I tried to look at it. I couldn’t even draw it out. I pulled and pulled. Finally it jerked it free. The sheath went flying and the blade was rust-red. Everybody around broke into hysterics. 5 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted September 13, 2019 Report Posted September 13, 2019 That's a great story Bob, thanks! Stories like that often give us tidbits that help explain things we see today - shortened blades; showa blades in wooden saya, leather covered, etc. Quote
kissakai Posted September 13, 2019 Report Posted September 13, 2019 Nice story and not what you would expect Quote
Brian Posted September 13, 2019 Report Posted September 13, 2019 Love it!Now I can picture these small little shops clustered around army bases, that would have catered to special orders or alterations to swords and other uniform items etc. It really does set the stage well.Thanks for sharing. 1 Quote
Shamsy Posted September 13, 2019 Report Posted September 13, 2019 I particularly appreciate that the sword was shortened, so it goes to show that it was a preference, at least in this case. 1 Quote
paul griff Posted September 13, 2019 Report Posted September 13, 2019 Hello, Thank’s for posting..Very interesting and very relevant... Regards, Paul Quote
Brian Posted September 13, 2019 Report Posted September 13, 2019 For me, what is particularly interesting is that for the sword to be shortened, the saya would have had to be shortened. Maybe this is why he had a wooden saya with leather cover? Did it originally have the original metal military saya? It would have been difficult to shorten a metal scabbard. So maybe swords that were shortened had the saya replaced with a wooden one and then covered in leather? Easy to fabricate a wooden saya and cover it. Is this the reason for so many leather covered wooden saya? 3 Quote
Bazza Posted September 13, 2019 Report Posted September 13, 2019 Mmmm, not so sure. 50+ years ago one of my very first swords was a Shinshinto wakizashi I got for fixing a bloke's car radio. It was ubu and had a wooden scabbard with a leather cover... BaZZa. Quote
PNSSHOGUN Posted September 13, 2019 Report Posted September 13, 2019 No reason for the saya to be shortened, plenty of wakizashi length swords in regular size steel saya. Quote
Brian Posted September 13, 2019 Report Posted September 13, 2019 No reason for the saya to be shortened, plenty of wakizashi length swords in regular size steel saya. John, kinda defeats the object of shortening the sword because it "was dragging on the ground" I am talking about this particular case, and all cases where it was shortened because it was too long. Leaving the saya original length kinda defeats the purpose. Bazza, wasn't saying this was the reason for every wooden sheath. Just that when they were shortened, this may be the cause of leather covered wooden saya with blades shorter than regular, and machi-okuri. 3 Quote
Michaelr Posted September 13, 2019 Report Posted September 13, 2019 I have seen both Wakizashi and Tantos in their original Shirasaya that have been covered with leather or some other material and mounts added. I have a Tanto in a leather covered Shirasaya and a Wakizashi in a Shirasaya covered with a green material similar to the material on a Tanker helmet. So if this sword was in its Shirasaya then it would have been no problem to shorten it. MikeR Quote
Logan09 Posted September 13, 2019 Report Posted September 13, 2019 Maybe this is why he had a wooden saya with leather cover? Did it originally have the original metal military saya? It would have been difficult to shorten a metal scabbard. So maybe swords that were shortened had the saya replaced with a wooden one and then covered in leather? Easy to fabricate a wooden saya and cover it. Is this the reason for so many leather covered wooden saya?The post says he had it in a white saya with leather scabbard but was dragging on the ground. I always thought the wood saya with leather cover was a cheaper option than the metal saya. Other note, this is why the "23.5 inch" rule for a katana always confused me. I have been seeing several gunto with what would be considered wakizashi blades mounted/used as katana. Pretty sure if a 5 foot tall Japanese man held a 24" blade tip down by their side they'd be digging a hole with the kissaki. Quote
Shamsy Posted September 13, 2019 Report Posted September 13, 2019 Interesting points, Brian. I think it's pertinent that the nakago was removed to shorten the sword. Obviously, that means that however much of the blade became the new nakago, it makes perfect sense that a corresponding length be cut from the top of the saya, with a (probably?) fairly easy incorporation of a new throat. 1 Quote
Brian Posted September 14, 2019 Report Posted September 14, 2019 Logan,He doesn't state it was in wooden sheath before he had it shortened. It was a military sword...put into a leather combat cover. Dragged on the ground, so he had it shortened.(Later) when he was deployed it hung on the wall and was in a wooden saya. Could be either I guess. Quote
Dave R Posted September 14, 2019 Report Posted September 14, 2019 The post says he had it in a white saya with leather scabbard but was dragging on the ground. I always thought the wood saya with leather cover was a cheaper option than the metal saya. Other note, this is why the "23.5 inch" rule for a katana always confused me. I have been seeing several gunto with what would be considered wakizashi blades mounted/used as katana. Pretty sure if a 5 foot tall Japanese man held a 24" blade tip down by their side they'd be digging a hole with the kissaki. Officially they start a bit shorter than that, and unofficially they can be much shorter. The late war buying programme for civilian swords was accepting the longer wakizashi. Below an extract from another thread on this site. 1 Quote
Logan09 Posted September 14, 2019 Report Posted September 14, 2019 Logan, He doesn't state it was in wooden sheath before he had it shortened My bad, mis-read. Quote
Shamsy Posted September 14, 2019 Report Posted September 14, 2019 Wow Dave, I don't even remember that post! So much lost to time and memory. I'm glad you dug it out again 1 Quote
Dave R Posted September 14, 2019 Report Posted September 14, 2019 Wow Dave, I don't even remember that post! So much lost to time and memory. I'm glad you dug it out again When I decided that I wanted a gunto, I sat at my computer and searched every damn site I could find for information, before I bought my first example..... I am in no way an expert, but I am a well informed tyro. 2 Quote
Death-Ace Posted September 14, 2019 Report Posted September 14, 2019 I feel that it's like any military protocol. You just go around it, haha. Just like sidearms of the day, you used what worked forbyou, if you're purchasing it. There's been plenty of wakizashi found with original koshirae and surely some placed in those mounts during/before the war. One I found appeared to have a slightly laquered saya, just as a protector. Surely as the war went on, everything started going last ditch. I've had three wakizashi remounted for the war. One was in Type 98, custom made, but with an elongated saya (blade was 22 inches nagasa), to make it look daito length. The other two was in original koshirae, but one was a very poor kazuuchimono, and the leather cover either poor quality or pressed paper. My last blade, an early Ko-Uda, may have been shortened before service or maybe during the Bakumatsu, as the mounts tend to lead to that. The blade, though getting tired, is very nice. The tosugu are iron, and the fuchi/kashira are welded. So I believe it to be the former. Just an old warrior someone wanted to bring to war from the family or bought from a shop, without pretty and expensive fittings. Fit for a soldier. I remember a Koa Isshin being sold on Heritage Auctions that had been shortened to wakizashi length, with some discussing was done post war, but this sheds new light as to theories. It was in shirasaya, and could have been done by a post-war practitioner, when many gendaito were used, but I wouldn't see the point of shortening a katana length blade to a wakizashi if the goal was for iaido or tameshigiri. Its probably general knowledge, I do believe older blades would have been shortened too to fit the owner's necessities. The tachi I had appeared to have had that. Plenty of swords were broken in the field, least on the continent, and repaired. I'm sure some were "customized" and placed into mounts as could be afforded. My thinking on shirasaya, tanto wouldn't have necessarily been used as much as a katana would in say, China, on those occasions, and thinking in the aspect that the sword is the soul of a warrior, didn't need it to be placed in koshirae, and to keep it protected until either he returned from the deployment, or death. So to keep it safe in a koshirae and keep his soul, was a win win. Or, as some katana and wakizashi we find with leather covering for a full shirasaya, maybe with a tsuba added as can be found, was the same train of thought. Maybe could not afford, or waiting for mounts to be remade. Or if that officer/soldier was not a swordsman by hobby, just wanted something to keep it safe in, but carry as per regulations. Surely most, even non-practioners, knew that a shirasaya isn't the best to use for combat! We know some officers had multiple swords, and I can almost guarantee that some of those said to have been captured in theatre actually were. Either say in a living quarters, or they decided to bring it to battle, even without the mounts. I think there are some that believe that the Japanese were to the book on everything during the war. But they were full grown adults, many very educated and had that westernized mindset or just being human, so nothing really is 100% to the T, haha. We have seen the recently discovered order for shorter wakizashi during the war years to be donated, and we all understand the reasoning and shortage, but we know that wakizashi, ko/o-, had been used since near the dawning of then-modern Japan. There's been quite a few wakizashi found in kyu-gunto, and high quality early Type 98 and Kai-Gunto fittings. This post is very interesting! Thank you Bob! Quote
PNSSHOGUN Posted September 15, 2019 Report Posted September 15, 2019 During wartime regulations can fall by the wayside from unit to unit and practicality in combat is more paramount than dress regulations on the front. Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted September 15, 2019 Report Posted September 15, 2019 Lev, Don't know if this is the same Mantetsu waki, but this one is a Spring '39, cut to waki length. 1 Quote
Death-Ace Posted September 15, 2019 Report Posted September 15, 2019 Bruce, That may have been it! Although, I do recall one in shirasaya, I believe. It did have the stamp, but the nakago had a more unrefined cut (still sharply done, but see an indent at the end from appeared to be a first attempt. Maybe I'm thinking it wrong, however. Quote
Dave R Posted September 15, 2019 Report Posted September 15, 2019 There are quite a few Showa era "Wakizashi" around, and I doubt they were made as part of a Diasho. I use the inverted commas because the modern definition by length is just that, a post 1945 definition used by the occupation forces. Perhaps a better term would be Shoto, or even Kodachi as they were not thrust through an Obi, but hung from the belt with a haikan on the saya. Quote
BANGBANGSAN Posted September 15, 2019 Report Posted September 15, 2019 When I decided that I wanted a gunto, I sat at my computer and searched every damn site I could find for information, before I bought my first example..... I am in no way an expert, but I am a well informed tyro. Dave I like to see the photos in your "WW2 Japanese Army Canvas sword bag for Gunto"folder if you don't mind.Thanks! Quote
Dave R Posted September 15, 2019 Report Posted September 15, 2019 Dave I like to see the photos in your "WW2 Japanese Army Canvas sword bag for Gunto"folder if you don't mind.Thanks! I make no claims on the authenticity of this item, I do not own it or the photo's. Shared for educational purposes only.... I thought it worth saving the pic's though. 1 Quote
BANGBANGSAN Posted September 15, 2019 Report Posted September 15, 2019 I make no claims on the authenticity of this item, I do not own it or the photo's. Shared for educational purposes only.... I thought it worth saving the pic's though. Dave Very cool,thank you! Quote
Logan09 Posted September 15, 2019 Report Posted September 15, 2019 Officially they start a bit shorter than that, and unofficially they can be much shorter. My comment was more on katana throughout history. But that's a discussion for another time or not at all. Quote
Dave R Posted September 16, 2019 Report Posted September 16, 2019 Being the sort of obsessive geek that I am, I went looking for Ryuichi Yokoyama and found him here. http://culport.jp/mangakan/english/life/life.html What made the search difficult is that he is far better known for his art work than his career in WW2. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.