Ray Singer Posted May 29, 2019 Report Posted May 29, 2019 享禄 is for Kyōroku period. This would be the 8th month of 1529. Quote
Ray Singer Posted May 29, 2019 Report Posted May 29, 2019 Jon, date edited above. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ky%C5%8Droku Quote
Ray Singer Posted May 29, 2019 Report Posted May 29, 2019 This looks like a Sue-Bizen blade. What is the mei? Quote
Jon MB Posted May 29, 2019 Author Report Posted May 29, 2019 Not really had time to take pics. Wakizashi. Quote
Jon MB Posted January 3, 2020 Author Report Posted January 3, 2020 I was wondering what this might be worth.. Quote
Jon MB Posted January 3, 2020 Author Report Posted January 3, 2020 From the date, it seems to slightly precede the main period of Kazu uchimono production, despite the use of 'Bishu' in the signature.. Quote
Jon MB Posted January 3, 2020 Author Report Posted January 3, 2020 Many thanks in advance for any comments. Ray was already extremely helpful. I am fond of this piece, but may pass it on as I have other purchases to cover, thus the question regarding approx value. Sue Bizen is not my strongest area.. Warm Regards, Jon B Quote
Ken-Hawaii Posted January 3, 2020 Report Posted January 3, 2020 If you're selling it, please post in the For Sale section, with a price. And please try to put all your photos in a single post. Quote
Jon MB Posted January 3, 2020 Author Report Posted January 3, 2020 I was asking for a rough idea on value as Sue Bizen seem to vary widely. Apologies on un-centralised picture posting. ...Maybe my question re value is a bit out of place. If so, I could ask if this item look to have any notable qualities that elevate it beyond kazu uchimono? Many thanks. Quote
SteveM Posted January 3, 2020 Report Posted January 3, 2020 I think you'd need a new polish in order for this sword's charms to make themselves apparent. On the positive side, it looks to be in good condition, ubu, and it has what looks like a nice hamon. I'm curious as to the length; the sword itself looks like it has katana-length, but when its next to the saya it looks shorter, and the saya looks like a wakizashi saya. On the negative side, its scratched up, its got a couple of (minor) hakobore, and it needs authentication. If its a wakizashi, I'll also include that on the negative side of the ledger - with reservations. The saya is, unfortunately, a write-off, but nothing to lose any sleep over, and it should be considered separately from the sword. Quote
Jon MB Posted January 3, 2020 Author Report Posted January 3, 2020 Nagasa 52 cm Overall 65 cm Thank you Steve. It's charms are indeed subtle. The calculation revolves around the not uncommon worries of: 'Spend more to enhance or cut losses, retreat' Quote
SteveM Posted January 4, 2020 Report Posted January 4, 2020 Yes - the usual refrain. If you are looking at the finances of this, I would sell it (or keep for yourself and enjoy it) as is. I don't know much about Katsumitsu (or, I should say the many Katsumitsu smiths). I wouldn't write the blade off as kazu-uchimono, but from what I see here; an out of polish, unauthenticated wakizashi, in distressed mounts...it feels like it would be a stretch to make a profit from a restoration project of this sword. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.