Cameron Posted May 27, 2019 Report Posted May 27, 2019 was wondering what insights people draw from this limited information? OISHI KURANOSUKE YOSHIKATSU, age 45katana mei: Norinaga (1,2), length 2 shaku 8 sunwakizashi mei: Norinaga (1,2), length 2 shakute yari YOSHIDA CHUZAEMON KANESUKE, age 64katana attribution: Shimada (1,x), length 2 shaku 2 sunwakizashi mei: Hiromitsu (3,1), length 1 shaku 1 sunnaga yari (long yari) HARA SOEMON MOTOTOKI, age 56katana mei: Hirohuni (3,1), length 2 shaku 9 sunwakizashi mei: Kunisuke (1,2), length 2 shakute yari KATAOKA GENGOEMON TAKAFUSA, age 37katana mei: Kunimitsu (2,1), length 2 shaku 7 sunwakizashi mei: Kunishige (1,2), length unknownte yari MASE KYUDAIU MASAAKI, age 63katana mei: Michitaka (1,2), length 2 shaku 1 sunwakizashi mei: Yoshitsuna (1,2), length 2 shakubow and arrow ONODERA JYUNAI HIDEKAZU, age 61katana mei: Michinaga (1,2), length 2 shaku 9 sunwakizashi mei: Kunisuke (2,2), length 1 shaku 9 sunte yari HAZAMA KIHEI MITSUNOBU, age 65katana mei: mumei (unsigned), lenght 2 shaku 9 sunwakizashi mei: Teruhiro (2,2), length 2 shaku 1 sun ISOGAI JYUROZEMON MASAHISA, age 25katana mei: Mitsumori (1,1), length 2 shaku 9 sunwakizashi mei: Kunimune (2,1), length 2 shakute yari HORIBEI YAHYOE AKIZANE, age 77katana mei: mumei, length 3 shakuwakizashi: nonenaginata CHIKAMATSU KANROKU YUKISHIGE, age 34katana mei: Mitsuyoshi (2,2), length 2 shakuwakizashi mei: unknown, length unknownlong yari TOMIMORI SUKEEMON MASAYORI, age 34katana mei: Tomokuni (2,1), length 2 shaku 8 sunwakizashi mei: Mitsushige (1,2), length unknownlong yari SHIOTA MATANOJYO TAKANORI, age 35katana mei: Kunihisa (1,1), length 2 shaku 4 sunwakizashi mei: Kunihisa (1,1), length 1 shaku 6 sun HAYAMI TOZAEMON MITSUTAKA, age 42katana mei: Hiromitsu (3,1), length 2 shaku 7 sunwakizashi mei: unknown, length unknownbow and arrow AKABANE GENZO SHIGEKATA, age 35katana mei: mumei, length unknownwakizashi mei: unknown, length unknown OKUDA MAGODAIU SHIGEMORI, age 57katana mei: Kunitaka (1,2), length 2 shaku 4 sunwakizashi mei: unknown, length 1 shaku 6 sun YADA GOROEMON SUKETAKA, age 29katana mei: Kunisuke (1,2), length 2 shakuwakizashi mei: mumei, length 1 shaku 6 sun OISHI SEZAEMON NOBUKIYO, age 29katana mei: mumei, length 2 shaku 9 sunwakizashi mei: mumei, length 1 shaku 9 sunlong yari OISHI SHIKARA YOSHIKANE, age 16katana mei: Tomokuni (2,1), length 2 shaku 2 sun pluswakizashi mei: Hiroshige (3,2), length 1 shaku 1 sunshort yari HORIBE YASUBEI TAKETSUNE, age 34katana mei: Kanekuni (2,1), lenght 2 shaku 8 sunwakizashi mei: mumei, length unknown NAKAMURA KANSUKE MASATOKI, age ?katana mei: Nagakuni (1,1), length 2 shaku 4 sunwakizashi mei: mumei, length unknownlong yari SUGANOYA HANNOJYO MASATOSHI, age 44katana mei: Michinaga (1,2), length 2 shaku 8 sunwakizashi mei: mumei, length unknown FUWA KAZUEMON MASATANE, age 34katana mei: Norimitsu (1,1), length unknownwakizashi mei: Norimitsu (1,1), length unknown KIMURA OKAUEMON SADAYUKI, age 46katana mei: Norimitsu (1,1), length 2 shaku 6 sunwakizashi mei: mumei, length 2 shaku 1 sun OHIBA SABUROBYOE MITSUTADA, age 51katana mei: Yasutaka (1,2), length 2 shaku 4 sunwakizashi mei: Yasutaka (1,2), length 2 shakubow and arrow OKANO KINUEMON KANEHIDE, age 24katana mei: Tomohisa (2,1), length 2 shaku 4 sunwakizashi mei: Michinaga (1,2), length unknownjyumonji yari KAIGA YAZAEMON TOMONOBU, age 54katana mei: mumei, length unknownwakizashi mei: mumei, length unknown OTAKA GENGO TADAO, age 32katana mei: Tomohisa (2,1), length 2 shaku 6 sunwakizashi mei: Masakuni (5,1), length 9 sun 5 bu OKAJIMA YASOUEMON TSUNEKI, age 38katana mei: Tomokuni (2,2), length 2 shaku 8 sunwakizashi mei: Tomokuni (2,2), length 1 shaku 4 sun YOSHIDA SAWAUEMON KANESADA, age 29katana attribution: Mizuta, length 2 shaku 9 sunwakizashi attribution: Mizuta, length 1 shaku 8 sunlong yari TAKEBAYASHI TADAHICHI TAKASHIGE, age 32katana mei: Hirokuni (1,1), length 2 shakuwakizashi attribution: Mizuta, length 1 shaku 6 sunlong yari KURAHASHI DENSUKE TAKEYUKI, age 34katana mei: Hirokuni (1,2), length 2 shaku 8 sunwakizashi mei: mumei. length 2 shaku HAZAMA SHINROKURO MITSUKAZE, age 24katana mei: Kunisuke (2,2), length 2 shaku 2 sunwakizashi mei: Kunisuke (2,2), length unknownte yari MURAMATSU KIHEI HIDENAO, agae 62katana mei: Kuninaga (1,1), length 2 shaku 8 sunwakizashi mei: Samuhiro (?,1), length 2 shaku 4 sunlong yari 4 Quote
lonely panet Posted May 27, 2019 Report Posted May 27, 2019 i can offer this post card. By the looks of the condition of there weapons, I would guess they were on the bones of there asses. (poor) 3 Quote
b.hennick Posted May 27, 2019 Report Posted May 27, 2019 Their story ended about 1702. I would expect their swords not to reflect blades of the 18th or later. They had 100 years of Shinto swords to choose from but seem not to favour Hizento. 1 Quote
Cameron Posted May 27, 2019 Author Report Posted May 27, 2019 1). Some smiths look popular across- ie Hiromitsu, Norimitsu seemed popular 2). Daishos from a single smith (at least in provenance obviously) Quote
Vermithrax16 Posted May 27, 2019 Report Posted May 27, 2019 Interesting. Seems a motley lot of samurai and swords. Quote
Cameron Posted May 27, 2019 Author Report Posted May 27, 2019 3) Signed Katana with mumei wakizashis. Makes sense under the utilitarian-based bushido of the very act they were about to undertake. ie your primary blade should be the most reliable. question- am i right in believing wakizashis were the more personal reflections of their personal honour? (I would expect this as it would spend most of its life at their hip, and would ultimately be the blade they could be required to commit seppuku with) Quote
PNSSHOGUN Posted May 28, 2019 Report Posted May 28, 2019 Lots of Kunisuke, I wonder if it was Kawachi No Kami smiths? One would imagine a Wakizashi would be more important in day to day activities as that is the sword you would have indoors or situations where your Daito was not allowed or not practical. 2 Quote
Ken-Hawaii Posted May 28, 2019 Report Posted May 28, 2019 There were also some old men in that group, considering that "old" was considered to be about 40, back then. 2 Quote
Cameron Posted May 28, 2019 Author Report Posted May 28, 2019 I find it very common for the upper class throughout pre-Meiji history to have significantly higher 'old' ages for obvious, less adverse life conditions. 1 Quote
C0D Posted May 28, 2019 Report Posted May 28, 2019 Seems there are also many very long blades, well over the 2.5 shaku which is now considered "standard" for practice for a man 175 cm tall, which i guess they weren't 2 Quote
Alex A Posted May 28, 2019 Report Posted May 28, 2019 On 5/28/2019 at 4:22 AM, Cameron said: I find it very common for the upper class throughout pre-Meiji history to have significantly higher 'old' ages for obvious, less adverse life conditions. Hizen Tadakuni swordsmith......94, excellent by todays standards. Died 1690,s 1 Quote
Robin Posted May 28, 2019 Report Posted May 28, 2019 The lenght of many blades is such I suspect they measured the full lenght instead of the nagasa. I'm just short of 180 cm and I use 2.45. Anything above 2.5 and I won't be able to get the blade out of the saya properly! An average Japanese man around 1700 was about 165 cm. "recommended blade lenght" about 2.35. A nagasa of 2.8 and 2.9...not likely. 2 Quote
C0D Posted May 28, 2019 Report Posted May 28, 2019 On 5/28/2019 at 7:24 AM, Robin said: The lenght of many blades is such I suspect they measured the full lenght instead of the nagasa. I'm just short of 180 cm and I use 2.45. Anything above 2.5 and I won't be able to get the blade out of the saya properly! An average Japanese man around 1700 was about 165 cm. "recommended blade lenght" about 2.35. A nagasa of 2.8 and 2.9...not likely. There are schools of iai that use odachi, so it's not a problem to get out the blade of the saya, just i feel interesting that such long blade was their sword of choice 1 Quote
Rivkin Posted May 28, 2019 Report Posted May 28, 2019 There is a documented weird thing about Edo samurai is that their height was at about 160cm against 170cm country average and kept declining with class. Tokugawa were nearly all in 140s (mistake - in 150s). Strict monastery diet in childhood, and narrow rice diet (with common beri-beri) in adhulthood. A wealthy farmer arguably enjoed a much higher quality of living. Compared to Nambokucho bushi with their 180cm and meat-venison rich eating. Kirill R. 4 Quote
Hoshi Posted May 28, 2019 Report Posted May 28, 2019 Very interesting. Do you have a source for this? This is fascinating but I suspect it's exaggerated and that the data, if any, is very weak, but I may be wrong. However, Diet + Genes = Height is a proven scientific fact. Nambokucho swords are heavier, larger, longer, and all together require a more muscular frame to use effectively. If the Samourai class and in particular the Tokugawa were short during Edo times, it makes sense to 'regulate' the size of sword to prevent their opponents from having a reach advantage, at least psychologically. Reach is a monumental factor in battle, and perhaps the single most important one when it comes to single combat. 1 Quote
Rivkin Posted May 28, 2019 Report Posted May 28, 2019 Actually found it. Two books (actually pamphlets) by Suzuki Hisashi in Japanese, bones of Japanese, and bones of Daimyo respectively. Daimyo are in 150-160cm range, especially Tokugawas and their class. Wealthy peasants on top of the distribution. Much larger spread of distribution for Nambokucho. It is a well known topic in historical publications. Japanese did extensive jobs studying old remains, and high ranks from Edo period are plainly speaking problematic. Also lots of lead from cosmetics. There are even articles in medical journals on sword wound mortality rates or studies of decapitated heads, or analysis of bones from different historical regions of Japan for different nutrition. Kirill R. 1 Quote
Dave R Posted May 28, 2019 Report Posted May 28, 2019 I remember reading that they deliberately chose longer swords, not caring about the law, as this was a mission they would not survive. The armour they wore was put together in secret, and to a certain extent improvised. Quote
eternal_newbie Posted May 28, 2019 Report Posted May 28, 2019 On 5/28/2019 at 7:28 AM, C0D said: There are schools of iai that use odachi, so it's not a problem to get out the blade of the saya, just i feel interesting that such long blade was their sword of choice On Youtube there's some clips of Shin muso Hayashizaki Ryu paired waza. These demonstrate the fast draw and use of a roughly 3 shaku blade against a wakizashi at close range, and with surprising speed/maneuverability considering the length of the sword. The founder of the school lived during the late 1600s and 1700s and supposedly used a blade over 3 shaku in length. 1 Quote
Jussi Ekholm Posted May 28, 2019 Report Posted May 28, 2019 It would be nice to know where Yamanaka? got this information. Here are the Kanji that were taken from Rich Steins site where the article states the names are referenced to the kanji tables on the site. I do think there might be some incorrect ones as typing errors etc. Norinaga 則永, Even though I would think this might be Shikkake Norinaga (則長) and c. 85cm tachi 1x daitō, 1x shōtō Shimada 1x daitō Hiromitsu 広光, I'd think Sōshū Hiromitsu but there are other possibilities too 1x daitō, 1x shōtō Hirokuni 広国, Can't guess which one this is 1x daitō Kunisuke 国助, Probably Kawachi no Kami 2x daitō, 4x shōtō Kunimitsu 国光, Lots of possibilities for 80cm+ tachi, Awataguchi, Rai, Shintōgo, Uda etc... 1x daitō Michitaka 道高, Can't find smith working pre 1700 signing this mei. 1x daitō Yoshitsuna 義綱, Most likely a Shimada smith 1x shōtō Michinaga 道永, There is only 1 Mino smith pre 1700 in Sesko 2x daitō, 1x shōtō Teruhiro 輝弘, This is most likely a smith of famous Teruhiro (輝広) lineage 1x shōtō Mitsumori 光盛, 1 Bizen & 1 Etchū smiths listed in Sesko 1x daitō Kunimune 国宗, So many possibilities 1x shōtō Mitsuyoshi 三吉, Can't find anyone signing like this 1x daitō Tomokuni 共国, Can't find anyone signing like this, I believe it might be 倫国, long tachi by Rai smith? 3x daitō, 1x shōtō Mitsushige 光重, Many possibilities 1x shōtō Kunihisa 国久, Many possibilities I think Uda might be strong one 1x daitō, 1x shōtō Kunitaka 国高, Higo,Uda,Settsu? 1x daitō Hiroshige 広重, Many possibilities 1x shōtō Kanekuni 包国, Yamato 1x daitō Nagakuni 長国, Ōshū 1x daitō Norimitsu 則光, Bizen comes first in mind of course but also Kaga 2x daitō, 1x shōtō Yasutaka 康高, Only one Bizen smith in Sesko 1x daitō, 1x shōtō Tomohisa 共久, Most likely candidate is Uda Tomohisa (友久) 2x daitō Masakuni 政国, Heianjō? 1x shōtō Mizuta 1x daitō, 2x shōtō Hirokuni 寛国, Can't find any smiths 2x daitō Kuninaga 国長, Many possibilities, Rai, Mino, Uda etc. 1x daitō Samuhiro ?? 1x shōtō Of course lots of guesswork in that above list and saying anything of real value is difficult. 10 Quote
Cameron Posted May 28, 2019 Author Report Posted May 28, 2019 Impressively thorough work there jussie! Quote
Cameron Posted May 28, 2019 Author Report Posted May 28, 2019 Uda pattern possibly for the multiple choices- Uda as a province or region, I presume? Quote
BIG Posted May 28, 2019 Report Posted May 28, 2019 Hi Cameron, Yamato province, Uda district.. https://wiki.samurai-archives.com/index.php?title=Yamato_province Best 1 Quote
Cameron Posted May 28, 2019 Author Report Posted May 28, 2019 now we're cooking! so Jussie, if we were go for the yamato and uda smiths more particularly where possible- what would that final list look like? (if you're interested of course, have already been accused of being too 'demanding') Quote
Jussi Ekholm Posted May 28, 2019 Report Posted May 28, 2019 I have very little knowledge of Samurai history in general, so someone like Markus could most likely offer insight on the status of these ronin before losing their master, their approximate wage levels, importance etc. That could be important in determing what swords they might have had. As I think something like Awataguchi or high quality Rai would have been priced above basic men and mostly owned by high ranking and rich individuals. I've been just researching so much top tier swords in books over the last 6 months that I tend to now automatically go for top tier smiths when seeing famous names... The Asano retainers were under Asano Naganori in Akō domain, that was in Harima province. Bizen was of course major sword supplier during the old times, don't know if the border next to province had any meaningful influnce in old swords, there were just so many Bizen swords available. Settsu being also a neighbouring province and a major hub (Ōsaka) it might have had an influence as possibly many swords by Kawachi no Kami Kunisuke are in the list and possibly some other Settsu smiths as well. Etchū province where Uda school is located is geographically bit further away. I think apart from the few famous makers Uda school might have been thought as workhorse swords even back in the day? I would need to see the Japanese signatures / the kanji of them to make any further educated guesses about the smiths. As some of the signatures would most likely have more than just 2 characters it would make identifying particular smiths bit easier. 4 Quote
Ken-Hawaii Posted May 28, 2019 Report Posted May 28, 2019 The correct use of saya-biki can allow a very-long blade to be drawn. I'm Robin's height, & have no trouble drawing a 3.0-shaku blade, although I use a 2.45 in MJER, & a 2.35 in kenjutsu. Quote
Bugyotsuji Posted May 29, 2019 Report Posted May 29, 2019 Looking at this: HORIBEI YAHYOE AKIZANE, age 77 katana mei: mumei, length 3 shakuwakizashi: nonenaginata I can imagine word being passed around before they set off. "Take your longest blades, in roughest koshirae possible, but leave the treasure sword to guard your family after you." PS There are exhibition rooms inside Oishi Jinja within the Ako Castle grounds, displaying several of their artefacts and swords. Sadly as is often the case, the place does not even attempt to meet museum standards so everything although indoors, is pretty much at the mercy of the elements. Sssshhhh... do not mention the R word. 3 Quote
Dave R Posted May 29, 2019 Report Posted May 29, 2019 On 5/29/2019 at 7:19 AM, Bugyotsuji said: Looking at this: HORIBEI YAHYOE AKIZANE, age 77 katana mei: mumei, length 3 shaku wakizashi: none naginata I can imagine word being passed around before they set off. "Take your longest blades, in roughest koshirae possible, but leave the treasure sword to guard your family after you." PS There are exhibition rooms inside Oishi Jinja within the Ako Castle grounds, displaying several of their artefacts and swords. Sadly as is often the case, the place does not even attempt to meet museum standards so everything although indoors, is pretty much at the mercy of the elements. Sssshhhh... do not mention the R word. I like the comment, but not the neglect . There is a cycle of plays that effectively tell the story of the 47, but names changed to protect the producer... It was not a popular theme with the authorities, so the events were portrayed as heroic fiction. The prints of the plays are well worth looking at. One intriguing thing of the original action, was the public declaration as it happened that this was a "legitimate act of revenge" and no threat to other neighbouring households. 2 Quote
Rivkin Posted May 30, 2019 Report Posted May 30, 2019 I suspect a typical high quality pre Muromachi blade at this point of time would be mumei, and possibly still longer than shinto katanas. Every single signed piece here is on the other hand likely to be shinto. Just a guess. Kirill R. 2 Quote
Dave R Posted May 30, 2019 Report Posted May 30, 2019 On 5/27/2019 at 10:17 PM, Hamfish said: i can offer this post card. By the looks of the condition of there weapons, I would guess they were on the bones of there asses. (poor) They were certainly destitute, being Ronin, but their weapons will have been functional. I strongly suspect that the missing parts and poor condition are due more to later souvenir hunting and neglect. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.