Jump to content

Beautiful tsuba, but who is Touryuusai? is it a modern tsuba?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Google brought me to Sesko's book on tsuba genealogies. Also this tsuba from nihontocraft. The Tanaka Toryusai school… sure you can find more with a little searching. Don't think this is modern.

 

Thanks for handling it Gabriel.

It does bring to mind the question of what is the most recent fitting that has papered?

 

I've seen NBTHK Hozon on a 2012 blade. Don't ask me for the link, as I didn't save it.

I've been a bit surprised how frequently the NBTHK is papering some 21st century blades.

In my lifetime will I see NBTHK papers on the fittings of artists that I knew?

  • Like 1
Posted

Google brought me to Sesko's book on tsuba genealogies. Also this tsuba from nihontocraft. The Tanaka Toryusai school… sure you can find more with a little searching. Don't think this is modern.

aww, thank you! the extra "u"s in the way they spelled "Touryuusai" gave no results on google so I was stumped for a bit.

 

Looking at the Toryusai school works, this one is slightly different in style. It looks so modern possibly because of the condition it's in, frankly at first glance I thought it may have been one of Ford's or Marcus's or Kevin's work. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Please to remember author of tsuba must be in afterlife to achieve sacred recognition of honorable truth sayers of NBTHK...

 

Dr. Lao (aka Apollonius of Tyana)

 

Well, yes...

...but other sensitive issues arise. To put it one way:   Any NBTHK papers on a Keith Austin blade yet?

Posted

Inlays yes, gold, silver, shibuichi, copper, on a shakudo ground.

 

-S-

Everytime I think "inlay" I think of objects "popping" out of the surface while this tsuba doesn't really have much so I'm confused where the inlays are.

 

Are those gold leaves gold inlays? are those flowers silver and copper inlays? since the colored areas look almost painted to the untrained eye (like mine). 

 

 

Posted

Everytime I think "inlay" I think of objects "popping" out of the surface while this tsuba doesn't really have much so I'm confused where the inlays are.

Are those gold leaves gold inlays? are those flowers silver and copper inlays? since the colored areas look almost painted to the untrained eye (like mine).

 

 

Steven is correct here

  • Like 1
Posted

Terminus,

 

The inlays are set into the shakudo plate of the tsuba and finished flush with the surface, all the various colors(alloys) you see are inlaid.

 

-S-

p.s.- Terminus, please add your first name and last initial(optional) to the bottom of your posts so we can address you properly.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Well, yes...

...but other sensitive issues arise. To put it one way: Any NBTHK papers on a Keith Austin blade yet?

That'd be very interesting to see in the future. He did train under a mukansa rated Smith.

Edited by Frank Gorelik
Posted

That'd be very interesting to see in the future. He did train under a mukansa rated Smith.

 

Yes. Still, technically a foreigner. This topic certainly has some history in those who know Sumo wrestling.

 

With blades, they are now papering up to the 21st century recently deceased. They certainly weren't when I started collecting. But foreign smiths?

 

As for fittings-  they still seem hesitant to paper 1930s mumei tsuba, even if the artist wrote a hakogaki for it and published a book in 1940 where he talked about making the tsuba. Guy wasn't well known. Other than that Higo fellow (Yonemitsu?), any modern fittings makers getting NBTHK papers? When Issei Naruki passes on, will his tsuba merit NBTHK papers? Yoshindo Yoshihara's tsuba? It will become more an issue with some of the talented non Japanese fittings makers.

Posted

Terminus,

 

The inlays are set into the shakudo plate of the tsuba and finished flush with the surface, all the various colors(alloys) you see are inlaid.

 

-S-

p.s.- Terminus, please add your first name and last initial(optional) to the bottom of your posts so we can address you properly.

Thanks for explaining that Steve! I'm new to the whole tsuba arts & craft, but after watching Ford's vids on youtube and reading some history here and there...it's insane the amount of work and detail put into them. This tsuba for example, it's hard to believe the maker took the time and precision to inlay each color for the leaves and flowers and then file it flush, wow!

 

-Tony

  • Like 1
Posted
Imho, the above f-k details do not look inlaid (suemon-zogan, "to set-in, to lay-in a pattern/design"), it's a takabori (high relief). And takabori is not a technique, it's a description of the item/motif made by embossing (uchidashi), inlay (suemon-zogan) or carving the ground plate (sukidashi-bori).

Posted

Tony,

 

Thank you, anytime.   Ford's videos are a unique learning tool, you can't do any better.  I suggest you check out www.followingtheironbrush.org, also his Facebook page....if you haven't already.

 

Cheers,

    -S-

Posted

Beautifull Tsuba, i wish i had it. Look at this wonderfull blossom on the back side. It looks like a painting. Great Tsuba.

For me i would turn the Tsuba with the backside on front mounting on a sword. That looks so nice.

 

It looks meji for me or very late edo.

  • Like 2
Posted

So I know it the mei says Toryusai, but does anyone else think this tsuba does not look like anything from the Tanaka Toryusai school? https://www.mfa.org/collections/search?f%5B0%5D=field_artists%253Afield_artist%3A923

 

From the flush inlay work and smooth base surface it looks vastly different from the tsubas in the MFA for Tanaka school. I guess their repertoire of skills and style is just really diverse.

Posted

aww, thank you! the extra "u"s in the way they spelled "Touryuusai" gave no results on google so I was stumped for a bit.

 

Looking at the Toryusai school works, this one is slightly different in style. It looks so modern possibly because of the condition it's in, frankly at first glance I thought it may have been one of Ford's or Marcus's or Kevin's work. 

Well... that's a can of worms - there are several different romaji "systems", the trouble is that the one us gaijin seem to use all the time "toryusai" isn't really in any of them - I'm as guilty of it as the next guy, but I'm working on it, really...

登竜斎 = とうりゅうさい = touryuusai.... 

 

Edit:

 

or... tōryūsai  (Thanks Jussi...), or...

 

I'm actually no longer a big Hepburn system fan, as its kinda hard to find all those macron-ed vowels on a standard keyboard (hot keys or alt-strings all the time... Give me a Break...) - I'm turning into more of a fan of the Wāpuro system which the original poster used/is used a lot anime/manga fanpeople use as it (IMHO) it preserves the "spelling" the best so it is fast to convert back to/from the hiragana/katakana (what, you're trying not to search in Japanese?... :-) ),  and 2)  even with the extra characters its faster to type because you're not having to figure out how to generate the macron-ed characters..

 

Best,

rkg

(Richard George)

Posted

I think correct form would be one Markus used in his listing 東竜斎 - Tōryūsai.

 

The Hozon paper actually states, mumei (kaō) (Tōryūsai school) - 無銘 (花押) (東竜斎派)

  • Like 2
Posted

As far as the appearance of this work, as Chris noted this is a late Tanaka piece, the major influences here are the Natsuo and Otsuki schools.  All three schools are interrelated and, to one extent or another, played off each other...more so as the century drew to a close.

 

-S-

Posted

 this is a late Tanaka piece, the major influences here are the Natsuo and Otsuki schools.

 

-S-

 

I'd say very late, as in 1900-1930s.

That is just gut instinct, based upon the workmanship and a lot of the sort of things exported commercially from Japan at that time.

 

SO....., nobody going to do the leg work of pulling up all the known 東竜斎 students and searching for a kao match in Haynes?

Quite doable legwork, and a basic skill worth doing now and then.

Posted

I'd say very late, as in 1900-1930s.

That is just gut instinct, based upon the workmanship and a lot of the sort of things exported commercially from Japan at that time.

 

SO....., nobody going to do the leg work of pulling up all the known 東竜斎 students and searching for a kao match in Haynes?

Quite doable legwork, and a basic skill worth doing now and then.

 

Actually the better question is why did the NBTHK did not bother to look it up..

 

Best,

rkg

(Richard George)

Posted

I'd say very late, as in 1900-1930s.

That is just gut instinct, based upon the workmanship and a lot of the sort of things exported commercially from Japan at that time.

 

SO....., nobody going to do the leg work of pulling up all the known 東竜斎 students and searching for a kao match in Haynes?

Quite doable legwork, and a basic skill worth doing now and then.

I would like to know too! it'll be great to know who the actual crafts person is...also because I may just buy this one lol. 

Posted

I would like to know too! it'll be great to know who the actual crafts person is...also because I may just buy this one lol.

 

 

 

 

I would be wary of the patina issues. Its a decent amount for such a "young" tsuba

  • Like 2
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...