Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

No it's not. Someone is trying to play you. I bet it feels like a bargain and it's stirring the spirits of greed deep inside. Good you post here, we will banish these evil ghosts. 

 

Aside from the lack of basically all classical muramasa kantei points, the nakago is wrong. Look at the chisel stroke, they feel fresh, crisp and deep, without any differential texturing due to aging. This is a big red flag for muromachi and older work. I'm not even refering to the stroke patterns for which I am not a good judge. Signature was added recently, and Nakado feels repatinated. This guy is fishing for a sucker, stay away. Look at the thickness of the Nakago, unless this was a Yoroi-doshi you won't find such thick tantos from the muromachi period. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I echo the concerns raised about this tanto. Muramasa is one of the most faked names:

- origami looks odd

- nakago is not properly shaped

- worried about the signature - look at the difference in execution of “Mura” and “Masa”. Wobbly lines. “Mura” seems to have been added after the holes were drilled and seems squeezed into the available space

- critique the filemarks on the nakago

- hada a bit too rough and too hamon looks too Mino like. Usually more nie and more kinsuji in his hamon

And so on and so forth

Posted

I've been dealing with the seller for something like 10 years now. He sells first rate items, but  just as easily he can take on a known fake.

This one will not paper NBTHK Muramasa. 

 

Kirill R.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...