wakiboy Posted December 1, 2018 Report Posted December 1, 2018 I have a Meiji period Tachi by a well known smith which is in Japanese polish with a small Fukure in the monouchi area, it is showing an hairline opening but you have to look to see it. My question is..... does this Fukure make the blade less interesting to a collector or is it a minor flaw that can be overlooked. Would you collectors consider buying a blade with Fukure? Hope you can see it in the picture.. Ian Quote
Ray Singer Posted December 1, 2018 Report Posted December 1, 2018 Fukure will impact value and is more affecting of value in later blades. A licensed polisher may be able to reduce the visibility of this, however there's also the question of whether the sword is worth the additional restoration expense. If it were mine and made by an exceptional shinshinto smith, I would have it at least evaluated by a good licensed togishi. Quote
wakiboy Posted December 1, 2018 Author Report Posted December 1, 2018 The smith is Miyamoto Kanenori. Quote
Guest Rayhan Posted December 1, 2018 Report Posted December 1, 2018 Looks more like a small ware, generally worse in Edo period swords onwards. If it is only a small one then better to not mess with it. Keep the sword well oiled and enjoy it for what it is. Any hand made object is prone to flaws at the end of the day https://www.japaneseswordindex.com/kizu.htm Quote
vajo Posted December 1, 2018 Report Posted December 1, 2018 Blister are often seen on late muromachi blades. I have a wakimono katana from muromachi which has some blister and ware. But i enjoy it often as it is. A true warrior sword not a artist piece. When they gets open from polish it looks not really better. My sword was polished in Japan and he tried not to open it. Quote
wakiboy Posted December 1, 2018 Author Report Posted December 1, 2018 I know that a collector looks for perfection whereas a student of nihonto only looks at the aesthetics (workmanship) for that smith/school/period etc and so a minor flaw would not be an issue. This blade is beautiful and in great polish and is a good representative piece for this smith, I am trying to see how the general membership feels about Fukure. 1 Quote
nagamaki - Franco Posted December 1, 2018 Report Posted December 1, 2018 Hello Ian, Typically you'll find there are two kinds of collectors, those who are tolerant of flaws and then those that are not regardless of how minor. Which says it has more to do with the individual than the sword. 4 Quote
wakiboy Posted December 1, 2018 Author Report Posted December 1, 2018 Hi Franco I know what you mean, personally I don’t mind minor flaws but I get criticised for trying to save blades with flaws. Regards Ian 1 Quote
John A Stuart Posted December 1, 2018 Report Posted December 1, 2018 Ware, to me, are much more acceptable than fukure. Lamination flaws are perfidious. I agree though, some people are dismayed when there is ohada breaking up otherwise homogenous hada. Like with women a little imperfection can accentuate the beauty. John 1 Quote
dwmc Posted December 1, 2018 Report Posted December 1, 2018 Hi Franco I know what you mean, personally I don’t mind minor flaws but I get criticised for trying to save blades with flaws. Regards Ian I found this to be an interesting comment on a Japanese sword site regarding exceptional swords. I suspect it could also apply to well made swords of later eras with minor flaws. "It is not so easy to find such an excellent blade even in Japan. Sometimes we can find unsigned blades with paper attributed to Soshu tradition, but many of them include some doubt in its character. On this blade, the character means Soshu tradition in 14th century undoubtedly, especially Mino tradition. This blade should be held by advanced collector who try to understand old good blades. It is not suitable for beginners who hate any flaws and want perfection. A masterpiece never mean perfect blade. A masterpiece can have flaws and has far bigger excellence." As mentioned personal preference, Dave M. 1 Quote
vajo Posted December 1, 2018 Report Posted December 1, 2018 A highly regarded smith should have no flaws in his swords. But nobody is perfect. If only perfect blades would be collect no one would be estimate the existence of flaws in such blades. A flaw shows that humans makes failures and not every sword will be perfect. Little failures makes the smith sympathic. And for the interested collector the price is sympathic too. Quote
Ken-Hawaii Posted December 2, 2018 Report Posted December 2, 2018 I would guess that the vast majority of flaws are likely due to how the blade was used & stored over the centuries. Even lamination flaws can show up many years after the blade was forged - there, but hidden, & revelaed by polishing. Quote
SAS Posted December 4, 2018 Report Posted December 4, 2018 The sword that the OP posted would not bother me, but further polishing might reveal issues in that area. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.