bwanapete Posted September 10, 2018 Report Posted September 10, 2018 I hoping for some help in identifying this as the characters don't look like the ones on the kanji pages, they seem very rounded and spurred? Wondering if this is a particular type of method of adding signatures to a sword, almost like a particular artists signature? many thanks Pete Quote
Stephen Posted September 10, 2018 Report Posted September 10, 2018 smith is Masatsugu, ill see if i can look up the rest, nicely cut mei. 2 Quote
Stephen Posted September 10, 2018 Report Posted September 10, 2018 MASATSUGU (正次), Shōwa (昭和, 1926-1989), Ōsaka – “Heianjō Okishiba Minamoto Masatsugu” (平安城 沖芝源正次), real name Okishiba Masatsugu (沖芝正次), he studied under his father Okishiba Yōkichi Masatsugu (沖芝要吉正次), rikugun-jumei-tōshō not sure if this one or not, not the Hizen one but his Masatsugu is close to same 2 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted September 10, 2018 Report Posted September 10, 2018 Pete, The year is 1945. The kanji look different because they written in the Japanese equivelant to our Script writing. The handle looks to have been recently re-wrapped, and the sarute (tassel loop) look new. Can't say if the rank tassel is original or a repro. Nice blade! 2 Quote
Stephen Posted September 10, 2018 Report Posted September 10, 2018 Bruce thanks for attn to tsuka, most looks new,fuchi replace? tassel looks repo 100% think the handle is complete rebuild, even habaki?? Quote
tokashikibob Posted September 11, 2018 Report Posted September 11, 2018 I wish I could redo a handle that well! Not a bad job 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted September 11, 2018 Report Posted September 11, 2018 Bruce thanks for attn to tsuka, most looks new,fuchi replace? tassel looks repo 100% think the handle is complete rebuild, even habaki?? Stephen, kabutogane, menugi, habaki, and tsuba seem original, but the fuchi looks new. Quote
BANGBANGSAN Posted September 11, 2018 Report Posted September 11, 2018 以真铁(Use real steel)正次(Mastsugu)锻之(Forging it) Quote
Stephen Posted September 11, 2018 Report Posted September 11, 2018 Thank you Trystan I really need to put down the cell and just look on big screen from now on. The texture on kashira looks to be same as fuchi. The tassle looks org the lighting makes the stitching stand out, pictures dont tell the true story, habaki has gold wash/leaf? and yes Bruce looks org too. Going to my room..lol 1 Quote
PNSSHOGUN Posted September 11, 2018 Report Posted September 11, 2018 Tassel is a repro, real ones don't have V stitching on the straps. Quote
IJASWORDS Posted September 11, 2018 Report Posted September 11, 2018 Blade looks good and original, there are some late reproductions added to koshirae, but a nice collectible package. Quote
bwanapete Posted September 11, 2018 Author Report Posted September 11, 2018 Grateful thanks for all of your help on this sword, I have much to learn about these magnificent pieces of history. Would $2500 be a fair price to pay for this sword as this is what the owner is asking for it? He told me that it was probably worth close to $5000?? I have absolutely no idea as I cannot make sense of prices on Ebay and other auction and sword websites. Many thanks Pete Quote
Stephen Posted September 11, 2018 Report Posted September 11, 2018 second Bs nope half tops and that would be a push. Now i have a 9500$ sword ill sell ya for $2500....you get the picture 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted September 11, 2018 Report Posted September 11, 2018 I don't know the smiths. Brian and Stephen have a better feel for that. Some famous smiths can garner those prices, and some Shrine swords. But if he's not one of those, then Showa gunto are currently selling from $800 to $1,200. I would personally wouldn't pay over $900-1,000 considering the non-original (though high quality) replacement parts. 2 Quote
dwmc Posted September 12, 2018 Report Posted September 12, 2018 Retired this tassel from gunto due to poor condition. Have had it for est. 25 years, my guess is it is quite real indeed. 1 Quote
Dave R Posted September 12, 2018 Report Posted September 12, 2018 I do not like the fuchi-kabutogane, the stippling is a bit random,... and of course there was loads of variation in the wartime fittings. Blade and habaki look ok, but I am worried that the hamon has been "enhanced". Not a $5000 sword. 2 Quote
dwmc Posted September 13, 2018 Report Posted September 13, 2018 Agree with all of the above, maybe $800 - $1000 tops. Having said this, there's really not much typical about the sword. The same looks rather new and white, suggesting recent rewrap, but on closer inspection, it does appear faded, staining from handling on the ito seems age appropriate, also damage around the mekugi ana is present. As Dave R mentioned, odd dimpled fuchi and kubutogane. Spiraled seppa, copper looking ashi and koiguchi, different habaki from normal. Oh yes. and that weird looking V stitch tassel. I'm definitely not suggesting the folks who consider the tassel as repo are mistaken.The photo of my tassel in my previous post is something I've been curious about for years. I have to say in Peters tsuka/tassel photo, the V suspension straps are identical to mine, however, the skirt? appears odd and missing blue twist threads. My tassel was attached to a Gunto I had purchased and about mid way down had a additional knot tied in suspension straps. I assume to shorten the over all length. The tassel in hand appears to be an upgrade type tassel, very supple , very well made, (possibly silk?) . Against my better judgement, I untied the additional knot,(big mistake), I'm sure the knot had been there since a least WWll. Almost immediately started coming apart, Hence damage seen in photo... So yes, these V stitch tassels I firmly believe are WWll era. I would like to ask John, Sephen, Bruce, Dave R, and all knowledgeable others. Could the koshirae and tassel adnormalities be due to construction in a occupied country, possibly Korea. etc... Quote
Stephen Posted September 13, 2018 Report Posted September 13, 2018 could be they were off one of the Chen reproductions? Dave being yours is real tired maybe replace with this still grime on from carry, i dont wash them. https://www.ebay.com/itm/332799259263 1 Quote
PNSSHOGUN Posted September 14, 2018 Report Posted September 14, 2018 Majority of Officers tassel should be made of silk regardless. I wonder if anyone else here has a tassel with this V stitching, not sure if it has been noted in any of the major reference books so far either. The stippled Fuchi is common on swords with leather retention straps. 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted September 14, 2018 Report Posted September 14, 2018 Dave, Agree with all of the above, maybe $800 - $1000 tops. Having said this, there's really not much typical about the sword. The same looks rather new and white, suggesting recent rewrap, but on closer inspection, it does appear faded, staining from handling on the ito seems age appropriate, also damage around the mekugi ana is present. As Dave R mentioned, odd dimpled fuchi and kubutogane. Spiraled seppa, copper looking ashi and koiguchi, different habaki from normal. Oh yes. and that weird looking V stitch tassel. I'm definitely not suggesting the folks who consider the tassel as repo are mistaken.The photo of my tassel in my previous post is something I've been curious about for years. I have to say in Peters tsuka/tassel photo, the V suspension straps are identical to mine, however, the skirt? appears odd and missing blue twist threads. My tassel was attached to a Gunto I had purchased and about mid way down had a additional knot tied in suspension straps. I assume to shorten the over all length. The tassel in hand appears to be an upgrade type tassel, very supple , very well made, (possibly silk?) . Against my better judgement, I untied the additional knot,(big mistake), I'm sure the knot had been there since a least WWll. Almost immediately started coming apart, Hence damage seen in photo... So yes, these V stitch tassels I firmly believe are WWll era. I would like to ask John, Sephen, Bruce, Dave R, and all knowledgeable others. Could the koshirae and tassel adnormalities be due to construction in a occupied country, possibly Korea. etc... Well, Dave, now that you mention it, a closer look at the ito does show hand-oil staining/darkening. I'd say with the saya being standard IJA spec, it's not like any other PETA or Occupied Lands work I've seen. If it's all original, then I'd default to a custom-order arrangement. You see things like this on fittings for an old blade, I've just never seen such a customization on a showato. But, like we all know, the only thing certain about WWII Japanese showato that that there is almost nothing certain! Concerning the tassel, we were discussing tassel standards on the Warrelics forum, and some of us started taking measurements and comparisons. I feel like there must have been many contractors making those things too, which injected variations is style, length, and quality as well. Who knows?! 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted September 15, 2018 Report Posted September 15, 2018 A small update: I just saw this seppa on Warrelics, owned by Shamsy, on an old sword that was used during the war. It has the same edge-style like this one on this thread. Obviously older, where this one looks new. But might add some legitimacy to this one? 1 Quote
dwmc Posted September 20, 2018 Report Posted September 20, 2018 Majority of Officers tassel should be made of silk regardless. I wonder if anyone else here has a tassel with this V stitching, not sure if it has been noted in any of the major reference books so far either. The stippled Fuchi is common on swords with leather retention straps. https://www.ebay.com/itm/Antique-Japanese-army-shin-gunto-sword-tassel-sword-katana-tsuba-armor-menuki/253812109954?hash=item3b18617282:g:ADUAAOSwOaBbTuHn#viTabs_0 Additional update: This appears to be another of the V stitch tassels. The seller in Osaka describes the tassel as rare, apparently, this may be somewhat true. However, I located the one above quite quickly in a very brief search. Rather odd this V stitch variation does not appear in reference material. But as Bruce previously mentioned, "many variations" . Quote
hxv Posted September 20, 2018 Report Posted September 20, 2018 Is it me, or do I see signs that a stamp may have been removed near the area under the habaki? Hoanh 1 Quote
Jean Posted September 20, 2018 Report Posted September 20, 2018 Hoanh, Could really be the case.... Quote
SteveM Posted September 20, 2018 Report Posted September 20, 2018 I think the year is 昭和十七年 (Shōwa 17), or 1942 And the signature using Japanese fonts and the original kanji is 以眞鉄正次鍛之 I like the looks of the mei as well. WW2 swords often use a very chippy, almost hastily-chiseled, stylized shorthand. The inscription on this sword has some echo of that, but it also uses a cursive style, and the end result looks very nice. I agree with the gents above. Not worth $5000, not worth $2500 (due to the sword furnishings being a mixed bag). But I have no reason to think the sword itself is fake, and so it belongs in the vast family of real military swords with bits assembled from various swords, and what looks to be new ray skin on the handle. So, yes about $1000 feels right. Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted September 20, 2018 Report Posted September 20, 2018 I think the year is 昭和十七年 (Shōwa 17), or 1942 . Dang, Steve, you’re right! I couldn’t see that 7 until now. I’m blaming bad lighting! Ha! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.