LonnieJ Posted August 26, 2018 Report Posted August 26, 2018 I have been looking to learn more about this sword. I am 47 now and can remember this sword being in his gun cabinet since I was a child. He fought on Okinawa and this is a bring back from there. I cannot find any stamp or serial number and I do not know how to remove the handle to look at the tang. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Quote
Stephen Posted August 26, 2018 Report Posted August 26, 2018 its a end of war gunto, the military guys will tell you more Quote
Stegel Posted August 26, 2018 Report Posted August 26, 2018 Steve is right, Late War type 95 NCO sword. It is the last of the eight patterns to be found in this model. These have been getting high prices over the last few years as they are reasonably rare. Yours also has the composite leather Combat cover over the scabbard.....nice! I have one with a suede cover. The ito wrap on the handle was also available in two colours - a reddish brown like yours(usually faded to a pinkish brown) and a dark green (possibly a faded black) In Dawson's book he speculated that it could have been for officer use because of this wrap. The Late War Patterns came with wooden scabbards instead of the metal ones commonly seen. I've added a photo for you to see the different Late War patterns. All type 95's came with serial numbers on blade and scabbard, when the wooden scabbards were introduced, they stopped putting serial numbers on the scabbards, but continued with Arsenal inspection stamps. The last pattern to have serial numbers on the blade was the knurled 'pineapple' wooden handled blades - which is the bottom one in the photo. The inspection mark to look for is "He" and it is shaped like the letter 'L' but rotated 90 degrees clockwise onto its side. It is normally found on the blade or fuchi (collar) at the end of the handle near the guard. You probably won't see it on your scabbard because of the leather cover, but it would be on the drag and the sides of the pressed metal throat which incorporates the hanger. Hope this gives you the information you were looking for. 4 Quote
LonnieJ Posted August 26, 2018 Author Report Posted August 26, 2018 Thank you for the information, you have answered many questions I had. Steve is right, Late War type 95 NCO sword. It is the last of the eight patterns to be found in this model. These have been getting high prices over the last few years as they are reasonably rare. Yours also has the composite leather Combat cover over the scabbard.....nice! I have one with a suede cover. The ito wrap on the handle was also available in two colours - a reddish brown like yours(usually faded to a pinkish brown) and a dark green (possibly a faded black) In Dawson's book he speculated that it could have been for officer use because of this wrap. The Late War Patterns came with wooden scabbards instead of the metal ones commonly seen. I've added a photo for you to see the different Late War patterns. All type 95's came with serial numbers on blade and scabbard, when the wooden scabbards were introduced, they stopped putting serial numbers on the scabbards, but continued with Arsenal inspection stamps. The last pattern to have serial numbers on the blade was the knurled 'pineapple' wooden handled blades - which is the bottom one in the photo. The inspection mark to look for is "He" and it is shaped like the letter 'L' but rotated 90 degrees clockwise onto its side. It is normally found on the blade or fuchi (collar) at the end of the handle near the guard. You probably won't see it on your scabbard because of the leather cover, but it would be on the drag and the sides of the pressed metal throat which incorporates the hanger. Hope this gives you the information you were looking for. Quote
LonnieJ Posted August 27, 2018 Author Report Posted August 27, 2018 Which way do you remove the handle or is there any reason to look at the tang on it? Quote
Stegel Posted August 27, 2018 Report Posted August 27, 2018 You're welcome Lonnie, By the way, i personally wouldn't remove the handle by unscrewing the two retaining screws, as there is not much to see really. These were all machine made and are not considered valuable in the nihonto sense, that is, traditionally (or non-traditionally ie. oil quenched etc) made by a smith who signed the blade and dated it. The blades have no characteristics of some of the officer blades which were generally privately purchased or family blades re-fitted into war time mountings. If you do remove the handle, you may find an inspection stamp and that's about it. These are not made by smiths and as such, are not signed or dated at all. You have the remnants of a company grade officers tassel on yours.. blue/brown, this is not uncommon as there was a materials shortage and sword shortage in the late 30's which persisted throughout the war. To alleviate this shortage for officers, the IJA had basically introduced a contingency plan where officers could rent or buy a type 95 issued sword- so these would have the company grade tassel instead of the normal NCO leather tassel. There is a post by Nick Komiya over at the War Relics forum which discusses this, i think that it is on this forum somewhere as well. This contingency plan saw the introduction of the incorrectly termed 'Type 3' or 'NLF' late war, sword for officers as an alternative to the more expensive type 98 mounts, which was made in 1940 according to Japanese war archive notes. Here's a link to Ohmura's site for some great general info on all types of Japanese Military swords: http://ohmura-study.net/900.html I think you'll find it a great read and no doubt get some more answers to questions you may have. 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted August 27, 2018 Report Posted August 27, 2018 Ernie! Good to see you! A couple of thoughts: Since this is a very late-war style, it seems that the gunto shortage early in the war would not explain the officer tassel on this one. Officers were buy/renting Type 95s in the late 30's and early 40's, whereas this one was made very late in the war. At face value, this one seems to support Ohmura's guess that the cloth-wrapped tsukas were made for officers. The fact the the tassels were cut off is along the lines of what some officers did when surrendering their swords at the end of the war. Clearly, Lonnie's grandfather could have found it without a tassel and grapped the officer one from a pile, so the evidence is not positive proof; but it at least tentatively supports Ohmura. But in the end, just speculation! Very nice expample Lonnie! 1 Quote
brannow Posted September 6, 2018 Report Posted September 6, 2018 Hi Lonnie, No need to removed the handle on this one. It wont reveal anything. As stated its a very nice last ditch sword and these are very collectable. Quote
Jon MB Posted September 6, 2018 Report Posted September 6, 2018 Bill, what do last-ditch pieces go for these days? Quote
LonnieJ Posted September 7, 2018 Author Report Posted September 7, 2018 Thanks Brannow. I appreciate the information and help from everyone on here. This is a very informative site. Hi Lonnie, No need to removed the handle on this one. It wont reveal anything. As stated its a very nice last ditch sword and these are very collectable. Quote
LonnieJ Posted July 23, 2021 Author Report Posted July 23, 2021 I am considering putting this up for sale. Can anyone give me a reasonable price range to ask? Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted July 24, 2021 Report Posted July 24, 2021 A quick scan of the web shows late-war Type 95s, asking price, ranging from $1,200 to $1,800 USD. Yours is a tough one because it's so late, it's not as "pretty", yet it's very nature as a possible officer sword made from NCO gunto manufacturers makes it, to me, more unique and therefore more expensive in value. But it will have to connect with the right guy that likes these late-war items. I know they are out there, and several of them frequent this forum. It also makes a difference if you're looking for top-dollar, or just want to move the item. If you want a quick sale, you price it below what everyone would expect. They get a good deal and you get a quick sale. Quote
Kaigunto230 Posted July 28, 2021 Report Posted July 28, 2021 Lonnie, this forum has a For Sale thread that may be helpful if you’d like to connect with those interested buyers: https://www.militaria.co.za/nmb/forum/6-for-sale-or-trade/ Quote
Kiipu Posted July 28, 2021 Report Posted July 28, 2021 Your Pattern 8 sword was made by Jinsen Army Arsenal in 1945. It is more likely to have been obtained in Korea during the postwar occupation. The US Army stationed two divisions in Korea immediately after the war. The inspection mark that is referenced in post #3 will look like this ヘ. Below is a link to another Pattern 8 sword showing the various locations of the ヘ inspection mark. Questions about "late war", NCO swords 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.