Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know not good karma these days to own anything ivory, but it came my way about 15+yrs ago , obviously made around the Meji period, I would suggest circa -1860/1880 !! any idea what the signature may be , supplied both ways not even sure what is the right way up.

post-193-0-87703700-1533228241_thumb.jpg

post-193-0-12461900-1533228278_thumb.jpg

Posted

Hi Ray.,

 

I'm going to make a wild guess 60px-%E9%BE%8D-bigseal.svg.png which is an archaic Chinese version of the  character  for dragon?

 

Can you please show a side view wide and side view close up of the complete tsuka?

  • Like 2
Posted

There were a large number of these produced for the export market after the opening of Japan.  The vast majority are actually bone, not ivory.  Look for Schreger lines to see if they are there.  You'll find them on the ends of the piece.

Posted

yes , Steven , i have the saya , there 10 dragons carved all over the tuska and saya diving in and out of the clouds , in fact a small portion of the saya is in the second photo.

Posted

Ray,

 

Ah that's better, fine example of Meiji ivory carving. You are fortunate to live in a climate that's kind to ivory, no doubt why the condition is so good.  99% of blades in this style koshirae are nonsense, any possibility yours is part of that 1% exception?

 

Cheers,

    -S-

Posted

"Nonsense" blades include repurposed "tired" and fatally flawed blades in addition to fake ones, did not feel it necessary to spell this out here.....I'll be more explicit in the future!

 

-S-

Posted

Those would usually be in the poorly carved "all flash, no substance" mounts. Bone and poorly done ivory.
This one is very well carved and of high class, so I wouldn't expect it to be a poor blade or even a repurposed one. Possible, but those are usually put into the bad bone carving koshirae.

Posted

Steven /Stephen

 

 

It is a good blade, that was submitted to the 2008 Uk - NTHK -Shinsa , papered with what looks like 100 points on the score sheet, then they scored through the 100 and changed to

70+ points , so my theory is what did they think it was before they changed the score and made there final assessment ?? and I know they do not issue point scores that high outside of

Japan ! unfortunately on the day I could not stay for the question and answer sessions after the event to ask why they changed the score.

 

 

 

I think this one will be heading to Japan for a polish .

  • Like 3
Posted

Brian.

 

To paraphrase Aesop- Fine feathers don't necessarily make fine birds.  I have seen many of these, including incredibly fine Shibayama one's that had blades of little value,  good one's are the exception.  These were costly curios to grace the.drawing room or parlor of the clueless afluent, things Japanese were all the rage.....the target consumer was not the "serious" sword collector.

 

-S-

Posted

Well done Gents,

 

Pardon my neoclassical moment, I could not resist posting this beautiful painting by an artist who was (sometimes) patronized by a God who wore short pants.  Malcolm, sounds like a difficult parting, what a wonderful thing to own.....even if only for a short while.

 

-S-

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...