John C Posted February 25, 2023 Report Posted February 25, 2023 @Bruce Pennington: Bruce: I’m trying to figure out the difference between number 3 and number 6 in the chart below in practical terms. Both Ohmura and Richard Stein note differences, however they do not provide examples. Do we have any examples of the differences between Koa Isshin and Mantetsu-to that we can look at? Thank you, From Ohmura: The sword which Mantetsu made is classifiable into the following three sorts. 1 The blade before being named "Kōa Issin". This blade has only Mantetsu's trademark stamp in a Tang. 2 A blade with "Kōa-Issin" Mei named the Kōa-Issin sword . 3 A blade with the stamp of the "Nan" of a Nanman Arsenal, and the stamp of "Ren" of a Nanman Arsenal Dalian factory. There is no Mei of "Kōa Issin" in this blade. The blade made in Nanman Arsenal from the middle of 1943 is seemed. The difference in these three sorts of blades is not known. From Richard Stein: Many swordsmiths were involved in the production of Mantetsu blades and used the "Koa Isshin Mantetsu" mei, hence it is important to judge each blade on its individual merits, not just on its signature. Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted February 25, 2023 Author Report Posted February 25, 2023 John, I don’t know where Richard Fuller got his information for that chart. I simply don’t believe number six. I will send him an email and ask him where that statement came from and see what he says. I have never had a Nan Ban Mantetsu in my hands, so I’ve never been able to actually compare the two. I personally don’t believe there’s any difference in any of the three versions of the blades he discussed. They simply just changed what they wrote on them. Quote
Bryce Posted March 22, 2023 Report Posted March 22, 2023 G'day Guys, I have never owned a Mantetsu and know very little about them. I would like to know if the Mantetsu blade measurements vary much? The reason I ask is that I think I have accidentally come into possession of a nice set of Mantetsu koshirae and was wondering what the chances of them fitting a random Mantetsu blade were? Cheers, Bryce Quote
PNSSHOGUN Posted March 22, 2023 Report Posted March 22, 2023 Hi Bryce, how exactly are you sure this was for a Mantetsu? The only specific variant I'm aware of has a very distinct Sarute barrel area and paint colour on the fittings. The only reason I ask is that your Koshirae doesn't appear to have this and also looks to have a Mon, something very rarely found on Mantetsu swords. You can see it quite clearly on this Koa Isshin from artswords.com 1 Quote
Bryce Posted March 22, 2023 Report Posted March 22, 2023 G'day John, I am not sure at all. I am just basing this on the fact that koa isshin mantetsu's appear to have a rounded back to the nakago and the tsuba and seppas on my koshirae are made to accommodate a nakago with a rounded spine. I haven't seen this feature on any other blades. I have never handled one, so I could be wrong. Cheers, Bryce 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted March 22, 2023 Author Report Posted March 22, 2023 Interesting idea, Bryce. I only have 1 and the tsuba/seppa set was missing on it when I got it. Maybe some of the guys with more than 1 like @BANGBANGSAN can check theirs to see. To your question, I've only had 2 in-hand in the past, but did compare them. A '39 and a '41, and the blades identical in shape and size. 1 Quote
BANGBANGSAN Posted March 22, 2023 Report Posted March 22, 2023 In addition to the Sarute barrel mentioned by John, the Mantetsu Daren(滿鐵大連裝) mount also has a unique Tsuba. Quote
Bryce Posted March 22, 2023 Report Posted March 22, 2023 G'day Guys, Here are a couple of sets from a 1941 mantetsu from AOIJapan and a 1943 from Artswords. Cheers, Bryce Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted March 22, 2023 Author Report Posted March 22, 2023 Good examples, Bryce! They both have the rounded corners in the blade hole like yours. Quote
Bryce Posted March 23, 2023 Report Posted March 23, 2023 Can anybody else provide information on mantetsu blade measurements and how much they vary? Cheers, Bryce Quote
PNSSHOGUN Posted March 23, 2023 Report Posted March 23, 2023 Hi Bryce, some photos comparing two Mantetsu together years back with noticeable differences to Sori, Nagasa and blade width. Unfortunately any measurements are long lost. 1 1 Quote
george trotter Posted July 7, 2023 Report Posted July 7, 2023 Hi Bruce, A friend picked up this Mantetsu blade (no fittings). Here are the markings for your records. Mune 'U' 704 dated spring 1942. Hope this is of use, Regards 1 2 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted July 7, 2023 Author Report Posted July 7, 2023 I love every one! Thanks George! 3 hours ago, george trotter said: Hope this is of use, And for the record, this is the 350th Mantetsu on file (mine anyway)! Attaching the latest Mantetsu chart. kiipu-mantetsu serial numbers (rev1).docx Quote
george trotter Posted July 8, 2023 Report Posted July 8, 2023 Hi Bruce, I found a Mantetsu rubbing in my "box of odds and ends" - forgot I had it. Tang is dated 1941 spring and has the mune mark/no of RE 71. I can't find very many of this RE on your list, so may be of interest? Regards, 1 3 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted July 8, 2023 Author Report Posted July 8, 2023 2 hours ago, george trotter said: RE 71. I can't find very many of this RE on your list, so may be of interest? Right, thanks George, good one! Quote
PNSSHOGUN Posted July 13, 2023 Report Posted July 13, 2023 A very strange Koa Isshin on Aoi, it does not appear to be authentic. Others can be the judge: https://www.aoijapan...army-sword-mounting/ 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted July 13, 2023 Author Report Posted July 13, 2023 39 minutes ago, PNSSHOGUN said: A very strange Koa John, If it is the mei that bothers you, I took a look at other '42s on file. Seems there are two 'styles' so maybe there were a couple of nakarishi (is that the right word?) cutting mei. Majority have this look But others have a similar look to the AOI one above What has always bugged me about AOI, is they rarely post photos of the serial number! Quote
Kiipu Posted July 13, 2023 Report Posted July 13, 2023 Hi John, that marking of 満鐵作 was only used in the 28th to 30th series. There are indeed a handful of Mantetsu tachi mei; but one can count them on one hand. However, the tang profile looks off to me. Also, why would someone in Japan get a Mantetsu polished? 1 Quote
Guest Simon R Posted July 13, 2023 Report Posted July 13, 2023 I also agree with John. The mei looks like it's been recently carved and then had an iron blackening chemical (readily available from Tokyu Hands) applied. I've used this chemical on cast iron and it produces the same 'slightly grey' patina. Quote
PNSSHOGUN Posted July 13, 2023 Report Posted July 13, 2023 Also note the Nakago-jiri shape, Nakago length and Yasurime - all radical departures from other Koa Isshin (including the variances above). 2 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted July 13, 2023 Author Report Posted July 13, 2023 Maybe that’s why they’re not posting the serial number! 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted July 21, 2023 Author Report Posted July 21, 2023 OK! Ready for this?!?! A REAL SMR Koa Isshin KAMAKAZI DAGGER!!! We can know it is real because is says "kamakazi" on the habak! HA! It even has a serial number on the mune for authenticity. Found on this Guns.ru thread. Update: I was shocked to see the serial number is correct for 1942 - "NO" ノ26!!! I'm still not buying. The stamped number on the habaki button and artificially blackened nakago is classic Chinese fakery, not to mention the horrific kanji work. 2 1 Quote
Kiipu Posted July 30, 2023 Report Posted July 30, 2023 Matt, I do not think I have this one recorded yet. Can you tell what the nakago mune markings are? FYI, it is an army contract blade and has the yamagata "M" partial inspection mark. *SUPERB KOA ISSHIN MANTETSU* WWII Japanese Samurai Sword SHIN GUNTO WW2 KATANA @mdiddy Quote
Ed Posted August 11, 2023 Report Posted August 11, 2023 Bruce, Here is another Mantetsu for your files. Picked this up a couple of weeks ago. Serial number starts with the Hiragana character "TO". TO99 2 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted August 12, 2023 Author Report Posted August 12, 2023 1 hour ago, Ed said: "TO". TO99 Thanks Ed, didn't have that one! Safe to assume it was in standard Type 98 fittings? 1 Quote
Ed Posted August 12, 2023 Report Posted August 12, 2023 10 hours ago, Bruce Pennington said: Thanks Ed, didn't have that one! Safe to assume it was in standard Type 98 fittings? Bruce, Yes type 98. 2 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted August 12, 2023 Author Report Posted August 12, 2023 On 7/30/2023 at 2:56 PM, Kiipu said: Matt, I do not think I have this one recorded yet. Can you tell what the nakago mune markings are? FYI, it is an army contract blade and has the yamagata "M" partial inspection mark. *SUPERB KOA ISSHIN MANTETSU* WWII Japanese Samurai Sword SHIN GUNTO WW2 KATANA @mdiddy @mdiddy Matt, any chance you have photos of the serial number on this one? Quote
mdiddy Posted August 20, 2023 Report Posted August 20, 2023 @Kiipu @Bruce Pennington Here is the mune marking. Yall got lucky this one was requested to hold and ship later. As an aside, it's better if you request this information from me earlier in the week that one is for sale and hit me up through my email or through eBay as those requests generally get worked sooner. 2 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted August 20, 2023 Author Report Posted August 20, 2023 Sweet! Thanks Matt! Have an U 704 on file already, so this U702 was right close by on the assembly line. Love it when that happens! Quote
Kiipu Posted August 20, 2023 Report Posted August 20, 2023 11 hours ago, Bruce Pennington said: Have an U 704 on file already, so this U702 was right close by on the assembly line. ウ七〇三 while @george trotter has reported ウ七〇四. U703 is an army contract blade with a yamagata "M" inspection mark. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.