Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

@Bruce Pennington:

Bruce:

I’m trying to figure out the difference between number 3 and number 6 in the chart below in practical terms. Both Ohmura and Richard Stein note differences, however they do not provide examples. Do we have any examples of the differences between Koa Isshin and Mantetsu-to that we can look at?

Thank you,

 

 

From Ohmura:

The sword which Mantetsu made is classifiable into the following three sorts.
1 The blade before being named "Kōa Issin". This blade has only Mantetsu's trademark stamp in a Tang.
2 A blade with "Kōa-Issin" Mei named the Kōa-Issin sword .
3 A blade with the stamp of the "Nan" of a Nanman Arsenal, and the stamp of "Ren" of a Nanman Arsenal Dalian factory. 

There is no Mei of "Kōa Issin" in this blade. The blade made in Nanman Arsenal from the middle of 1943 is seemed. The difference in these three sorts of blades is not known. 

From Richard Stein:

Many swordsmiths were involved in the production of Mantetsu blades and used the "Koa Isshin Mantetsu" mei, hence it is important to judge each blade on its individual merits, not just on its signature. 

Screen Shot 2023-02-25 at 12.15.02 PM.png

Posted

John, I don’t know where Richard Fuller got his information for that chart. I simply don’t believe number six. I will send him an email and ask him where that statement came from and see what he says.

 

I have never had a Nan Ban Mantetsu in my hands, so I’ve never been able to actually compare the two.  I personally don’t believe there’s any difference in any of the three versions of the blades he discussed. They simply just changed what they wrote on them.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

G'day Guys,

I have never owned a Mantetsu and know very little about them. I would like to know if the Mantetsu blade measurements vary much? The reason I ask is that I think I have accidentally come into possession of a nice set of Mantetsu koshirae and was wondering what the chances of them fitting a random Mantetsu blade were?

Cheers,

Bryce

 

Koshirae1.jpg

Tsuba.jpg

Tsuka.jpg

Posted

Hi Bryce, how exactly are you sure this was for a Mantetsu? The only specific variant I'm aware of has a very distinct Sarute barrel area and paint colour on the fittings. The only reason I ask is that your Koshirae doesn't appear to have this and also looks to have a Mon, something very rarely found on Mantetsu swords.

 

You can see it quite clearly on this Koa Isshin from artswords.com

 

 

image.thumb.png.22a51922bbbd4eadc093deaf75e166f9.pngimage.thumb.png.9743056692da5a1965e7a0fcb3030c88.png

image.png.57f6257e5fe7503b4799bc52a39f15da.png

 

  • Like 1
Posted

G'day John,

I am not sure at all. I am just basing this on the fact that koa isshin mantetsu's appear to have a rounded back to the nakago and the tsuba and seppas on my koshirae are made to accommodate a nakago with a rounded spine. I haven't seen this feature on any other blades. I have never handled one, so I could be wrong.

Cheers,

Bryce

 

Tsuba2.jpg

  • Wow 1
Posted

Interesting idea, Bryce.  I only have 1 and the tsuba/seppa set was missing on it when I got it.  Maybe some of the guys with more than 1 like @BANGBANGSAN can check theirs to see.

 

To your question, I've only had 2 in-hand in the past, but did compare them.  A '39 and a '41, and the blades identical in shape and size.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

G'day Guys,

Here are a couple of sets from a 1941 mantetsu from AOIJapan and a 1943 from Artswords.

Cheers,

Bryce

 

Mantetsu Koshirae 1941.jpg

Mantetsu Koshirae 1943.jpg

Posted

Hi Bryce, some photos comparing two Mantetsu together years back with noticeable differences to Sori, Nagasa and blade width. Unfortunately any measurements are long lost.

 

 

 

20181210_174531[1].jpg

20181210_174535[1].jpg

20181210_174614[1].jpg

20181210_174619[1].jpg

20181210_174628[1].jpg

47573194_1893451627440235_1636476874437689344_n.jpg

47573864_613919879024200_8990240782531166208_n.jpg

47575606_336291020523298_7707971901104062464_n.jpg

47579499_226077694956450_3199353492779040768_n.jpg

47682307_355607308337138_5175283859075366912_n.jpg

  • Thanks 1
  • Wow 1
  • 3 months later...
Posted

Hi Bruce,

I found a Mantetsu rubbing in my "box of odds and ends" - forgot I had it.

Tang is dated 1941 spring and has the mune mark/no of RE 71.

I can't find very many of this RE on your list, so may be of interest?

Regards,

mantetsu 1941 re 71.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Posted
39 minutes ago, PNSSHOGUN said:

A very strange Koa

John,

If it is the mei that bothers you, I took a look at other '42s on file.  Seems there are two 'styles' so maybe there were a couple of nakarishi (is that the right word?) cutting mei.

 

Majority have this look                  But others have a similar look to the AOI one above

MeiVariants2.png.be0637ec2546927e7cde03f2be1ed1a0.png                         MeiVariants.thumb.png.ebdb8fba30eff2a123ebb85833dee632.png

 

What has always bugged me about AOI, is they rarely post photos of the serial number!

Posted

Hi John, that marking of 満鐵作 was only used in the 28th to 30th series.  There are indeed a handful of Mantetsu tachi mei; but one can count them on one hand.  However, the tang profile looks off to me.  Also, why would someone in Japan get a Mantetsu polished?

  • Like 1
Guest Simon R
Posted

I also agree with John.

The mei looks like it's been recently carved and then had an iron blackening chemical (readily available from Tokyu Hands) applied. I've used this chemical on cast iron and it produces the same 'slightly grey' patina.

IMG_9612.jpeg

Posted

OK!  Ready for this?!?! A REAL SMR Koa Isshin KAMAKAZI DAGGER!!!  We can know it is real because is says "kamakazi" on the habak! HA! It even has a serial number on the mune for authenticity.   Found on this Guns.ru thread.

 

32085833_26940.jpg.c9d4b8265d17fc5a8b19124853371776.jpg32085833_26951.thumb.jpg.e52e695a838d1a100ef7f1ae1167da37.jpg32085833_26960.thumb.jpg.be7f114ca8f2aa36b10ce59cdded560a.jpg32085833_26969.thumb.jpg.f749b2109fc880db00004ad46211df1b.jpg

 

Update: I was shocked to see the serial number is correct for 1942 - "NO" ノ26!!!  I'm still not buying.  The stamped number on the habaki button and artificially blackened nakago is classic Chinese fakery, not to mention the horrific kanji work.

  • Haha 2
  • Sad 1
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Bruce, 

Here is another Mantetsu for your files. Picked this up a couple of weeks ago. Serial number starts with the Hiragana character "TO". TO99

 

 

image.thumb.jpeg.1419ccb0eb47f51cce838b483486f4cc.jpeg

 

image.thumb.jpeg.c3c9e5c340fd040af4a480bdee4b12db.jpeg

 

image.thumb.jpeg.2dac47653179325df779e3ec5c9f8644.jpeg

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Bruce Pennington said:

Thanks Ed, didn't have that one!  Safe to assume it was in standard Type 98 fittings?

Bruce, Yes type 98.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.e1f3d2dbe05fc614a2ff39062c280ce4.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.23ed040a4c6d3d32f0b2b611c907a90e.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.92a10651110c03701444bc4b2ea54a13.jpeg

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 7/30/2023 at 2:56 PM, Kiipu said:

Matt, I do not think I have this one recorded yet.  Can you tell what the nakago mune markings are?  FYI, it is an army contract blade and has the yamagata "M" partial inspection mark.

*SUPERB KOA ISSHIN MANTETSU* WWII Japanese Samurai Sword SHIN GUNTO WW2 KATANA

@mdiddy

@mdiddy Matt, any chance you have photos of the serial number on this one?

Posted

@Kiipu @Bruce Pennington

 

Here is the mune marking. Yall got lucky this one was requested to hold and ship later. :)

 

As an aside, it's better if you request this information from me earlier in the week that one is for sale and hit me up through my email or through eBay as those requests generally get worked sooner.

Mantetsu Extra Pic Request.jpg

  • Thanks 2
Posted
11 hours ago, Bruce Pennington said:

Have an U 704 on file already, so this U702 was right close by on the assembly line.

 

ウ七〇三 while @george trotter has reported ウ七〇四.  U703 is an army contract blade with a yamagata "M" inspection mark.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...