Surfson Posted June 7, 2018 Report Posted June 7, 2018 If I'm not mistaken, this person has been selling mumei blades made in China, and I think that the sword that was put through the NTHK-NPO shinsa was from this same shop. My opinion was always that their swords are interesting (though worrisome) modern hand made swords and they should sign their name on them and sell them for what they are - a modern attempt to make a traditional method Japanese sword. This one appears to be different to me from their previous efforts, as it is a clear fraudulent attempt to deceive a potential buyer into thinking they are buying a sword made by Inoue Shinkai. Just my two bits worth. https://www.ebay.com/itm/The-Japanese-Samurai-Sword/232791981856?hash=item36337bbf20:g:W1oAAOSwqqRa7nMb Quote
ROKUJURO Posted June 7, 2018 Report Posted June 7, 2018 I cannot read the MEI, but offering a "SHINKAI" for $ 330.-- is not too fraudulent in my eyes. 1 Quote
Brian Posted June 7, 2018 Report Posted June 7, 2018 I think you are correct Robert. And the description is clearly intended to deceive.. :From used sword market, no paperwork with it. Relist. No return" 1 Quote
drjoe Posted June 7, 2018 Report Posted June 7, 2018 http://www.militaria.co.za/nmb/topic/24821-the-other-komonjo/ the sword you posted actually looks pretty good and diverges from the usual characteristics of these "fake" swords. this one has a natural-looking hamon and an unusual amount of ara-nie throughout the blade. the jigane looks good and the kissaki is well-formed.were it not for the seller and the signature, i'm not sure it would be readily identified as a non-nihonto. Quote
Surfson Posted June 7, 2018 Author Report Posted June 7, 2018 That's exactly right Joe. This maker has decided to take the lower road, not the high road. In front of our eyes this curiosity is becoming a serious crime. Quote
Stephen Posted June 7, 2018 Report Posted June 7, 2018 past sales... he has another ebay name we have talked about before https://www.ebay.com/sch/wblwbl12/m.html?item=232791981856&hash=item36337bbf20%3Ag%3AW1oAAOSwqqRa7nMb&LH_Complete=1&rt=nc&_trksid=p2046732.m1684 Quote
paulb Posted June 7, 2018 Report Posted June 7, 2018 Sorry gents but I disagree this sword looks anything but pretty good. Were it thought to be Japanese then the only explanation for the extremely ugly ara nie is that at some point in it's history it has been badly burned. Nie is jewel like and beautiful, this is scaly and down right ugly. The only thing on this that shows a marked improvement on earlier Chinese fakes is the shape. 3 Quote
Surfson Posted June 7, 2018 Author Report Posted June 7, 2018 Paul, I am not making the point that the work has improved to the point that an expert like you can't tell it's a fake. But rather, this one, unlike the other ones being sold by the two ebay sellers that Stephen has pointed out, has a name of a famous maker put onto the artificially aged tang. While the others could be generously viewed as "copies", by putting a fake name of a famous artist on it, this one must now be referred to as a fraud. Quote
Ray Singer Posted June 7, 2018 Report Posted June 7, 2018 There was recently a Chinese copy with a gimei of Enomoto Sadahito & Sadayoshi (purporting to be a gassaku). So, shinsakuto as being copied as well (and in this case, patination of the nakago is not necessary)... Quote
paulb Posted June 7, 2018 Report Posted June 7, 2018 Robert I fully understood and agree with your point. Once something is misrepresented as this has been a threshold has been crossed and it effectively become fraud and criminal. The comment I was really responding to was : "the sword you posted actually looks pretty good and diverges from the usual characteristics of these "fake" swords" and as said I don't think it looks pretty good.(Other than the shape). Quote
Surfson Posted June 7, 2018 Author Report Posted June 7, 2018 Whoever is making these swords could probably finish the nakago, then sign the finished nakago with their own name, devise a nice carved logo (like kiku mon or minatogawa,but personalized) and get a following of collectors willing to pay the same as they are fetching now. In fact, currently, the ugliest part of them is the obviously artificially aged nakago. Though I agree with Paul about the nie etc., some of them have interesting hada. Quote
tokashikibob Posted June 7, 2018 Report Posted June 7, 2018 The hobby is really going to have a hard time attracting new enthusiasts with the quality of fakes hitting the market now. Stinking fakes! Quote
John A Stuart Posted June 7, 2018 Report Posted June 7, 2018 If it involves money, it can be faked. Museums are full of faked art and artifacts. Always; caveat emptor. John Quote
Curran Posted June 7, 2018 Report Posted June 7, 2018 On 6/7/2018 at 10:11 PM, John A Stuart said: If it involves money, it can be faked. Museums are full of faked art and artifacts. Always; caveat emptor. John https://edition.cnn.com/style/article/french-museum-half-paintings-fake-intl/index.html Quote
John A Stuart Posted June 7, 2018 Report Posted June 7, 2018 An example of greed ruining good intent. John Quote
drjoe Posted June 8, 2018 Report Posted June 8, 2018 On 6/7/2018 at 7:14 PM, paulb said: Robert I fully understood and agree with your point. Once something is misrepresented as this has been a threshold has been crossed and it effectively become fraud and criminal. The comment I was really responding to was : "the sword you posted actually looks pretty good and diverges from the usual characteristics of these "fake" swords" and as said I don't think it looks pretty good.(Other than the shape). to be clear, i wasn't trying to say that this is a "good" piece compared to a real Japanese shinsakuto or nihonto, just that is looks significantly better and less cartoonish than most of the fare from these sellers, which are readily recognizable as fakes. i stand by the fact that many would be hard pressed to differentiate this blade from one made in Japan but for the signature -- its sugata, kissaki, jigane, and hamon are comparable to the real thing. in general ara nie is never seen in chinese fakes -- i wasn't trying to argue that the profuse ara nie that is spread all over this blade is a good thing so much as i was trying to suggest it does make it harder to differentiate from true nihonto. most of the komonjo blades look strange and asthetically off in various ways. likewise, the changtian-sword items often have significant forging flaws and also cartoonishly ridiculous hamon. this one doesn't really have any of those features. i think most of what we've seen to date are failed attempts in one way or another, but overall the quality is getting better. but i certainly agree, as with the komonjo blades, that these are deliberate frauds and bad for the art of nihonto in general. i also agree that were they sold without a signature or with the seller's actual signature/stamp they might very well sell at a pricepoint above what these usually go for. instead, this appears to be a work in progress with a deliberate attempt to mislead and one that's getting harder to detect. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.