Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

There may be a chance that the Mei is not faked but made by Shodai Tanba no Kami Yoshimichi of the Mishina Ha of Osaka/Settsu (the 3rd son of Shodai Tanba no Kami Yoshimichi of the Mishina Ha of Kyoto/Yamashiro) = Hawley YOS 391!!The 2nd signature/dating (Bushu Edo Mishina Yoshimichi shortened this sword in the 2nd month of Kansei 3 [1792]) is a little bit strange:there is no member of the Mishina Ha-either Kyoto or Osaka- to be found at Edo/Musashi!

Nihonto Meikan and Hawley (YOS 385) are showing a "Shinto" one from Edo with no further data.It's not the 7th gen.Tanba no Kami Yoshimichi from Osaka (YOS 402,also Hyuga;he died in 1805):the 2 examples from REI 37/1993 and Art and the Sword/1991 are quite dfferent.

If the Mei is faked,why should a later swordsmith,who shortened the sword,add an inscription like that one at all,with the statement being a member of the Mishina school?!

Get it papered!Ludolf

Posted

Thanks Ludolf for the research. I still have not heard anything back from the NTHK on authenticating the signature. I find it strange that someone would sign and date when a sword was shorten if the sword was a gemie from a prior generation. Very weird.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...