ROKUJURO Posted January 21, 2018 Report Posted January 21, 2018 Stephen,my first impression was MITSU, but you are probably right. A very 'individual' TOMO?Let's see what the masters of the writing brush say! 1 Quote
Stephen Posted January 21, 2018 Author Report Posted January 21, 2018 Thanks Jean i too started a search for niji mei starting Mitsu ...tachi mei Nambokucho era due to O kissaki, could be Shinshinto of course but the the end missing rest of the mei looked older Did a double check in my Dobree and A14 looks closer to mei. PM sending asap Quote
Markus Posted January 21, 2018 Report Posted January 21, 2018 Suke (左). http://clioapi.hi.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ships/ZClient/W34/z_list.php?title=%E5%B7%A6&resourcetype=0 1 Quote
Stephen Posted January 21, 2018 Author Report Posted January 21, 2018 Thanks Markus Your the master but i just dont see it. Ill look in your e file Quote
Markus Posted January 21, 2018 Report Posted January 21, 2018 Side by side with handwritten SUKE (左). 4 Quote
Peter Bleed Posted January 21, 2018 Report Posted January 21, 2018 A fun thread! I was betting on Tomo, but once again we have to say, "If only the Romans had gotten there before the Chinese..." Peter 2 Quote
SteveM Posted January 22, 2018 Report Posted January 22, 2018 Suke or Sa? http://glyphwiki.org/wiki/u352b 1 Quote
Stephen Posted January 22, 2018 Author Report Posted January 22, 2018 im game ....lolo so easy... no really lets see what Morita sama says, getting interesting i say. SA (左), Ryakuō (暦応, 1338-1342), Chikuzen – “Sa” (左), “Chikushū-jū Sa” (筑州住左), “Sa – Chikushū-jū” (左・筑州住), real name Minamoto Saemon Saburō (源左衛門三郎), priest name Keigen (慶源), son of Jitsu´a (実阿), nicknames Ō-Sa (大左) and Samonji (左文字), he lived in Ikihama (隠岐浜) and is traditionally listed as one of the “Ten Students of Masamune” but this is denied by now, he was active between Kenmu (建武, 1334-1338) and Bunna (文和, 1352-1356), there is only one tachi extant by him, the meibutsu Kōsetsu-Samonji (紅雪左文字), but many tantō, the tachi has a wide shinogi-ji, an elongated kissaki, and a maru-mune, the tantō are mostly rather small and measure between 21 and 24 cm, they have a little sori and scarce fukura, there are also some tantō with uchizori or some in kanmuri-otoshi-zukuri extant, the jigane is a densely forged ko-itame with plenty of ji-nie and can also tend somewhat to masame, the jigane is bright and clear and shows yubashiri and/or chikei, the hamon of the tachi is a notare to ō-midare and of the tantō a slightly undulating notare mixed with midare, but also blades in ko-midare or suguha are found, at any case the hamon shows much nie and has a wide nioiguchi, sunagashi can appear in a prominent or in a more unobtrusive manner, sometimes a large yakikomi is found along the ha-machi, the bōshi tapers in a characteristic way which is called Samonji-bōshi, some blades also have a sugu-bōshi with a ko-maru-kaeri, at several works the signature is divided as “Sa” and “Chikushū-jū” on the two sides of the tang, with forging a prominent jigane and a bright jiba, Sa moved away from the traditional, quite classical Kyūshū style, saij Quote
SteveM Posted January 22, 2018 Report Posted January 22, 2018 Is it a two-character name, or just the one character? Edit: Looking at the photos now. Its hard to tell if its originally a two-character name that lost its second character due to suriage shortening, or if it was always just the one character. Quote
Stephen Posted January 22, 2018 Author Report Posted January 22, 2018 It will go out of my reach. https://page.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/c637335944 Quote
Markus Posted January 22, 2018 Report Posted January 22, 2018 Thought it is a two character signature... Having now the whole context, I tend to think it is only one character and somebody clumsily put a Sa (Samonji) gimei onto a mumei blade. Edit: Its the same character though, 左, which is read SA by itself and SUKE in combination with another one (focusing on the readings of swordsmith's names). 4 Quote
PNSSHOGUN Posted January 22, 2018 Report Posted January 22, 2018 Nice piece Gimei or not, is that a late war or Naval tassel on it? Quote
SwordGuyJoe Posted January 22, 2018 Report Posted January 22, 2018 Off topic, but have you ever noticed that half the swords on yahoo are by muramasa? 3 Quote
Stephen Posted January 22, 2018 Author Report Posted January 22, 2018 Thanks John i thought it too...even if the Nihonto gods...er snobs..poo poo it un unworthy. Not sure but might be faded blue tassle. Quote
Markus Posted January 22, 2018 Report Posted January 22, 2018 Unworthy? No comment was made about the blade itself, which doesn't look bad at all. Quote
nagamaki - Franco Posted January 22, 2018 Report Posted January 22, 2018 Thank goodness for mumei. Quote
Stephen Posted January 22, 2018 Author Report Posted January 22, 2018 Markus, i wasn't referring to you, i would never shoot the messenger lol 1 Quote
Stephen Posted January 22, 2018 Author Report Posted January 22, 2018 like this Jose? https://page.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/e258836989 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.