benkyoka Posted September 9, 2017 Report Posted September 9, 2017 A not so knowledgable friend is telling me that someone he knows has a Masamune. Of course, I'm highly skeptical but thought i would put this out here for discussion, or at least confirmation. It's been a while since I posted something here. I know longer live in Japan and my Nihonto are kept with family back there. I really miss them but this board is an excellent salve for that. Quote
Shugyosha Posted September 9, 2017 Report Posted September 9, 2017 Well...it says Masamune so it has to be. I can't believe that anyone would bother to fake one. Have you seen the blade? 1 Quote
benkyoka Posted September 9, 2017 Author Report Posted September 9, 2017 Unfortunately (?), no. When this person mentioned the blade for me I asked for pictures but only got these. I mentioned the strong possibility of Gimei but that wasn't received well. Heh Quote
Shugyosha Posted September 9, 2017 Report Posted September 9, 2017 Well, if he believes that it is genuine, he probably ought to get it polished and get the signature authenticated. According to Markus Sesko, there are only four signed Masamune blades that are definitely attributable to Gorō Nyūdō Masamune, so if he has a fifth, that would really be something. I'm sure he has a good reason for not bothering to get an expert opinion of the signature. That said, I suppose he could beieve that it is a genuine example by one of these smiths: MASAMUNE (正宗), Eishō (永正, 1504-1521), Sagami – “Sōshū-jū Yamanouchi-jū Masamune” (相州住山内住 正宗), “Sōshū-jū Gorō Nyūdō Masamune” (相州住五郎入道正宗), “Masamune” (正宗), nickname Yamanouchi-Masamune (山内正宗)MASAMUNE (正宗), Kan´ō (観応, 1350-1352), Musashi – “Bushū-jū Masamune” (武州住正宗), “Masamune” (正宗), according to tradition the student of the Kenmu-era (建武, 1334-1338) Tameyoshi (為吉)MASAMUNE (正宗), Daiei (大永, 1521-1528), Musashi – “Bushū-jū Masamune” (武州住正宗), “Shitahara-jū Masamune” (下原住正宗), “Masamune” (正宗), Shitahara school, mostly a hiro-suguhaMASAMUNE (正宗), Keichō (慶長, 1596-1615), Musashi – “Tosa no Kami Fujiwara Masamune” (土佐守藤原正宗), Shitahara school, probably the same smith as “Hitachi no Kami Fujiwara Masamune,” chūjō-sakuMASAMUNE (正宗), Keichō (慶長, 1596-1615), Musashi – “Hitachi no Kami Fujiwara Masamune” (常陸守藤原正宗), Shitahara school, probably the same smith as Tosa no Kami Fujiwara MasamuneMASAMUNE (正宗), 1st gen., Enbun (延文, 1356-1361), Bingo – “Bishū-jū Masamune saku” (備州住正宗作), Ko-Mihara school, according to tradition the son of the 2nd gen. Masaie (正家), standing-out itame-nagare, suguha with ashi, yō and sunagashiMASAMUNE (正宗), 2nd gen., Eitoku (永徳, 1381-1384), Bingo – “Masamune” (正宗), Mihara school, it is said that he signed first with Masasada (正貞)MASAMUNE (正宗), 3rd gen., Bunmei (文明, 1469-1487), Bingo – “Masamune” (正宗), “Bingo no Kuni Masamune saku” (備後国正宗作), Kai-Mihara group, he was noticeably later active than the 2nd gen. but he is nevertheless listed as 3rd gen. Bingo-Masamune, mostly a suguha-hotsure and a long kaeri, also a ko-midare or gunome, chūjō-sakuMASAMUNE (正宗), Eitoku (永徳, 1381-1384), Yamashiro → SHIGEMITSU (重光), Eitoku (永徳, 1381-1384), YamashiroMASAMUNE (正宗), Ōei (応永, 1394-1428), Yamashiro – “Masamune” (正宗), he lived in Rakutō (洛東), i.e. in the eastern KyōtoMASAMUNE (正宗), Eikyō (永享, 1429-1441), Ōshū – “Gassan-jū Masamune” (月山住正宗), Gassan schoolMASAMUNE (正宗), Tenbun (天文, 1532-1555), Yamato – “Fujiwara-jū Masamune” (藤原住正宗), Kanabō school (金房)MASAMUNE (正宗), Tenshō (天正, 1573-1592), Yamato – “Washū Nanto-jū Fujiwara Masamune” (和州南都住 藤原正宗), Kanabō school, gunome-midare, suguha mixed with ko-ashi, wazamonoMASAMUNE (正宗), active period unknown (kotō), Echizen – “Masamune” (正宗) 4 Quote
Jean Posted September 9, 2017 Report Posted September 9, 2017 Syd, Just tell him that there were fourteen different smiths called Masamune so it is not necessarily "The Masamune". Quote
PNSSHOGUN Posted September 9, 2017 Report Posted September 9, 2017 And also hundred of other smiths that mysteriously signed "Masamune" on their blades as well.... Quote
vajo Posted September 9, 2017 Report Posted September 9, 2017 Look at the arrows Syd. That looks fine in my eyes. Could we see how the hamon ends? Quote
TheGermanBastard Posted September 9, 2017 Report Posted September 9, 2017 It definately is THE Masamune - in the owners oppinion ... Hence he would be unlogical on his side to not ask a tremendous amount for it ... which again on your side just should drop your interest in this blade to 0. Believers want to believe. Quote
Ken-Hawaii Posted September 9, 2017 Report Posted September 9, 2017 No, sellers want you to believe so they can get some sucker to pay more. Ken Quote
vajo Posted September 9, 2017 Report Posted September 9, 2017 I would search for the masamune in the cellars and attic of old german housings We where Allies Ok, not in the attic. Harris destroyed most of them. Cheers Chris 1 Quote
Ed Posted September 9, 2017 Report Posted September 9, 2017 Tell him when it has been authenticated and papered by the NBTHK to Masamune, he will be taken much more seriously. Until then it is merely another sword with Masamune inscribed in it. It is worth as much as it would be with no signature at this point. 2 Quote
Shamsy Posted September 9, 2017 Report Posted September 9, 2017 I can think of nothing I'd be prouder to do than return one of Japan's missing national treasures without consideration of a reward. Quote
tokashikibob Posted September 9, 2017 Report Posted September 9, 2017 It looks like a interesting sword with plenty of nihonto characteristics to check the quality of, if it were me I'd make the effort to see it ASAP. If he's close to N.C. let me know and I'll do it. Best regards, Bob Quote
benkyoka Posted September 11, 2017 Author Report Posted September 11, 2017 Thanks everyone. I've yet to see the blade myself but will see about getting some more info and images. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.