Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey there,

 

recently got this nihonto with few informations about it. There's a lot to read on it, so I feel somehow helpless. There's a lot to translate, especially for one person, so every little bit would be very helpful.

 

Thank you very much guys!

post-4084-0-94827200-1496079550_thumb.png

post-4084-0-84179300-1496079554_thumb.png

post-4084-0-34259900-1496079558_thumb.png

post-4084-0-49465200-1496079563_thumb.png

post-4084-0-57235500-1496079567_thumb.png

Posted

So from the tang it should be Bizen Osafune, backside saying August, but last letter I do not know...

For the sayagaki I cannot help myself at all.

 

Thats all I know atm.

Posted

I'll take a cursory first pass at the sayagaki

 

1st pic - 脇指 銘 備前長船住勝光 八月日

 

2nd pic - 備前勝光 初代応永頃、七代文亀頃 _有

- 又四代の弟時代明応及永禄頃

 俗名 「太郎兵衛尉勝光」と刻す(別?)く

 勝光の一刀_有_作

 時代永禄頃の勝光作刀__珍重

  • Like 2
Posted

Put it to shinsa, there are a few things to check. I have never seen such nengo. I don't like the mei and the way the kanji "ju" is put after Osafune... But I am often wrong :)

Posted

Thank you all, but to the shinsa point, Shinsa would bemore expensive than what I payed for the blade, not sure if this is worth...

 

Any idea where to search for a whole translation of the sayagaki?

Posted

Maybe it's not the best translation but you can use Bing Translate option:

 

Thanks to the kanji provided by Matt the translation of the second picture:

 

Bizen Katsumitsu First œi, governors Bunkai
-also generations's brother age 1498 and Eiroku
Common "Taro Yasufumi Katsumitsu" and Susu (another? )
Katsumitsu's Sword _ the work
Katsumitsu of the Age Eiroku
Posted

Matt has provided a very good transcription of the sayagaki; which basically says the writer thinks this sword can be attributed to a smith named Katsumitsu working in the Eiroku era (1558-1570). The name of the person who wrote the sayagaki is Hon'ami, and if you search the internet a while you can find out more about the Hon'ami family. This particular sayagaki was written in 1978, which means the writer should logically be Hon'ami Kōhaku, but the signature does not look right to me.

 

From the way it is written, it looks like the writer is hinting very strongly that this sword was made by 4th generation Katsumitsu, first name of Tarōbei, active in the Eiroku era. 

https://nihontoclub.com/smiths/KAT107

It also lists some background information about the Katsumitsu line, and it lists the sword length. 

Posted

Unless Markus Sesko's book "swordsmiths A to Z" is uncomplete, 4th generation (the most valuable) never signed this way (nor any other btw as I strongly suggested). Gimei.

Posted

Question on the Katsumitsu in the sanmei link. Why is the Harmon more active and different compared to the other side ? Is this a flaw or a negative?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...