Nlf Gunto Discussion

[Jcstroud]

Is it possible that the different anchor stamps could indicate different sources of production? Such as  Takayama,Seki,Tenshozan ? My reasoning is if you notice Masanao,Kanenao,and Toyosuke seem to have the same 8mm stamp in the same location if my memory serves me correctly. PS hey guys been a while hope you are all well.  JOHN 

[Bruce Pennington]

Nice to see you again, too, John!

 

Your idea is possible.  I had the vague theory that the large was from post-war Tenshozan, while the small was from wartime Toyokawa.

However, we (and I mean @Kiipu, @BANGBANGSAN, and @mecox) are trying to research the challenging idea that Toyokawa was not involved in making kaigunto at all and the circled anchor was a broad-based Navy stamp used by other/all Naval Arsenals.

 

So, much work to be done on the Navy side of the stamping house.

[Jcstroud]

Perhaps by grouping swords by stamp size,and also by swordsmiths known locations.In combination with physical traits such as paint color could help pin down location of fabrication.Such as Takayama for example.Well thats my 2 cents worth for now.

[Bruce Pennington]

20 minutes ago, Jcstroud said:

Perhaps by grouping swords by stamp size,and also by swordsmiths known locations.In combination with physical traits such as paint color could help pin down location of fabrication.Such as Takayama for example.Well thats my 2 cents worth for now.

I'll have a look through my files, John.  Been needing a project to chase.  I haven't spent much time on the kaigunto.  There's just not as many to sample, and they are mostly undated, so data is harder to build.  But I'll have a look.

[John C]

11 hours ago, Bruce Pennington said:

There's just not as many to sample,

Not to sound morbid, but is that because they "went down with the ship" or because there were simply fewer Naval officers?

 

John C.

[Bruce Pennington]

12 hours ago, John C said:

is that because

Checking Wikipedia, they estimate that at the end of the war the Navy had 1.66 million personnel (don't know the percentage of officers) vs 5.4 million for the Army.  So right away, you can see there would be four times as many army gunto as navy.  Then, like you say, every ship that went down carried it's officers and kaigunto with it.

[Jcstroud]

On 10/31/2024 at 2:23 PM, Jcstroud said:

? My reasoning is if you notice Masanao,Kanenao,and Toyosuke seem to have the same 8mm stamp in the same location if

I reread my notes and it was the4mm stamp that was used predominantly

[Jcstroud]

I am going to go out on a limb on this comment: the souvenir swords with a  sheared off flat cut nakago were likely from Takayama forge and were originally longer training swords for Toyama training camp and were made to takayamas specifications then later cut under the direction of Kazuiichi Hattori.

[Bruce Pennington]

Interesting idea, John.  Certainly possible!

[Jcstroud]

Well one thing for sure a hack saw wont do nothing to that metal .that is some tough stuff

[Bruce Pennington]

After our recent discovery that the circled-anchor stamp is most likely a Navy acceptance stamp, not specific to Toyokawa Naval Arsenal, it is still a mystery as to why all these souvenirs were stamped.  I have 100 charted now, and only 4 are not stamped.

Options:

1. The massive majority of blades used by Tenshozan for the souvenir were surplus from the war.  If so, did the Navy inspector actually inspect/approve of blades that had not been finished?  The nakago jiri on most of them were unfinished.  I suppose this is possible, considering the loosening of quality requirements in the last year of the war.

2.  There was a living Navy inspector working with Tenshozan after the war, stamping blades.

3.  Tenshozan had the stamp and used it for the Wow effect on the souvenir blades as they made them.

We may never know.

[Jcstroud]

The records of the army documents contract name "The Japanese Naval Sword  Company " aka Tenshozan Tanrenjo .I suppose the swords would have to have at least a element of Naval characteristics to satisfy the army contract .Along with " premise " that the blades were not used in combat  as a condition of  the contract.

[John C]

3 hours ago, Jcstroud said:

Naval characteristics

John:

You might be able to answer this - are the handles on the souvenirs slightly shorter than a regular gunto? I was thinking that if so, it could explain why the nakago on the blades were so abruptly cut in order to fit the souvenir. 

 

John C.

[Jcstroud]

The records of the army documents contract name "The Japanese Naval Sword  Company " aka Tenshozan Tanrenjo .I suppose the swords would have to have at least a element of Naval characteristics to satisfy the army contract .Along with " premise " that the blades were not used in combat  as a condition of  the contract.

[Jcstroud]

Hey JohnC ,to answer your question the nakagos of the Takayama-to  was about 1 shaku or 303mm

The Rinji seishiki 242 mm the R.J.T. nakago spec.was 217 mm the souvenir swords 226mm,1940 naval spec was 206mm std kosherai. If my notes are correct. Itrust all is well with you and yours.

John Stroud

The measurement for the takayama to is an approximate measure as I have yet to physically measure one .Using length to width ratio to calculate from photos.

[Jcstroud]

18 hours ago, John C said:

John:

You might be able to answer this - are the handles on the souvenirs slightly shorter than a regular gunto? I was thinking that if so, it could explain why the nakago on the blades were so abruptly cut in order to fit the souvenir. 

 

John C.

It is my belief that the souvenir blades were originally 2nd design Takayama- to's with long nakagos intended for Takayama Ryu and or Toyoma Ryu for training cadets .Being surplus were collected by Zenhiro Hattori with the help of his Son in law Eiji ,then hot cut to fit standard RJT length koshirai at the Tenshozan Tanrenjo

[John C]

That could be. We may never know without definitive documentation. Hot cutting the nakago of pre-existing blades makes sense because the limited time they had to fill the orders after the red tape would have necessitated the need-for-speed.

 

John C.

[Jcstroud]

Once more I am going out on a limb on this commentary : I beleive that Toyosuke was the name used to designate swords for Toyama Ryu ,and Takeyasu name was used to designate swords for Takayama Ryu for Batto jutso training.And were likely made by the same swordsmith filemarks and other characteristics being the same suchas green paint,black paint,4mm naval acceptance stamp,hot cut nakagos...