Jimmy R Posted November 27, 2016 Report Posted November 27, 2016 I am looking to tap the deep well of knowledge here to verify authenticity of some papers. Both swords are free of fatal flaws with all surface details visible. Thanks for any help Jim Quote
Bugyotsuji Posted November 27, 2016 Report Posted November 27, 2016 Jim, what do you want to know? Do these papers look genuine or fake? The Norimune paperwork on the right looks right, although aside from the photo, the Mei is only recorded in pencil top left of the envelope, not in ink. ("Studied under Sukemune".) It does go into some detail regarding the blade itself and activity within. No mention of what organization they are. Further paperwork missing? Simply someone's opinion? The older paperwork on the left looks good to my untrained eye, though the -Kuni of Katsukuni on the envelope is hard to see, and I do not know this particular organization. 美術日本刀保存審査会 Bijutsu-Nihonto-Shinsakai. Cannot see any Mei on the nakago. The age, Kanbun, seems to fit, as do the dimensions. If it is a clever fake, then I need to do some more homework. Quote
Jimmy R Posted November 27, 2016 Author Report Posted November 27, 2016 Yes. Sorry. Real or Fake? The NBTHK papers I have seen look different and I have never seen JTK papers except one set online. Quote
paulb Posted November 27, 2016 Report Posted November 27, 2016 Jimmy, I dont know th organisation that produced these. They are not from either of the two most recognised authentiaction bodies, the NBTHK or NTHK (either), Wihtout knowing the organisation that produced them it is difficult to gauge their likely accuracy I am guessing hey are either dealer or polisher produced. That doesn't mean they are wrong but they don't carry the commercial authority of papers from the main groups. Quote
Stefan Posted November 27, 2016 Report Posted November 27, 2016 I do think that the green paper is fake. Please take a close look on the stamp above the nakago photo. It should have the exakt same dimensions as the stamp below the name of the society. If my old eyes are not playjng a trick to me, the stamp over the nakago is more longish and it is broken. There seems to be a gap. Quote
uwe Posted November 27, 2016 Report Posted November 27, 2016 No Stefan, the gap in the stamp above is caused by the thickness of the glued in picture. Regards Quote
Kronos Posted November 27, 2016 Report Posted November 27, 2016 I've seen the green one on here before iirc, it was from a dealer and called the ktk or some such. I wouldn't put any stock in either of them tbh. Quote
Stefan Posted November 27, 2016 Report Posted November 27, 2016 No Stefan, the gap in the stamp above is caused by the thickness of the glued in picture. Regards O.K. I see. Than only one question : Why is the stamp longish an not ident with the other one. Probably a stupid question, but after seeing to many fake papers i am pretty nitpicking about such details. Quote
Guido Posted November 27, 2016 Report Posted November 27, 2016 I would have given those papers the benefit of doubt (i.e. being issued by some little known organizations) if it wasn't for the obvious attempt to make them look like (old) NBTHK and NTHK papers at first glance. It is clear that they were made to deceive, and therefore details of the seals etc. are irrelevant. 4 Quote
Shugyosha Posted November 27, 2016 Report Posted November 27, 2016 I would have given those papers the benefit of doubt (i.e. being issued by some little known organizations) if it wasn't for the obvious attempt to make them look like (old) NBTHK and NTHK papers at first glance. It is clear that they were made to deceive, and therefore details of the seals etc. are irrelevant. Hi Guido, You know far more about this than I do, but for me it begs the question of why go to all the trouble of faking the papers and not give the swords themselves a more attractive attribution that would inflate their price? Kind regards, John Quote
Jimmy R Posted November 28, 2016 Author Report Posted November 28, 2016 This topic of papers needs more attention than it is getting. Come on nihontonerds lets see a more comprehensive public knowledge emerge from the great NMB egg! The white papers resemble those issued by the Juho Token kenkyukai. Although only one single example is on the Internet!! Quote
Bugyotsuji Posted November 28, 2016 Report Posted November 28, 2016 Juho Token Kenkyu Kai, never heard of them, except for this shop where they will charge you 10,000 JPY for writing one. Wakizashi example shown. You seem to have one of their two sheets. http://www.musasiya.co.jp/token.htm Quote
Jimmy R Posted November 28, 2016 Author Report Posted November 28, 2016 Has anyone been there? I will give them a call. Are they respected appraisers? Quote
Guido Posted November 28, 2016 Report Posted November 28, 2016 The white papers resemble those issued by the Juho Token kenkyukai. There's indeed some resemblance. However, the penmanship of the "certificate" in the first post is extremely poor, maybe even written by a non-Japanese. Quote
Guido Posted November 28, 2016 Report Posted November 28, 2016 ..., but for me it begs the question of why go to all the trouble of faking the papers and not give the swords themselves a more attractive attribution that would inflate their price? Probably for the same reason that one finds many gimei of lesser known smiths on swords - people get more easily suspicious if it's a famous smith, and have a closer look at the papers as well. Quote
Guido Posted November 28, 2016 Report Posted November 28, 2016 BTW, 门 is an abbreviation of 門 - it can be occasionally seen in Japan, but is the standard character in China; I wouldn't expect to see it on a Japanese certificate. 2 Quote
Jimmy R Posted November 28, 2016 Author Report Posted November 28, 2016 Thanks Guido. I live in Japan and this was purchased here so chances are it was written here. It looks pretty typical for the scrawl employed in most documents I see. Also, as I get older my handwriting gets less beautiful, so maybe this is another reason. Does anyone have an example of these papers? Quote
YOJIMBO Posted November 28, 2016 Report Posted November 28, 2016 http://www.ebay.com/itm/MURAMASA-Certificated-Sword-in-KOSHIRAE-16th-C-MUROMACHI-Period-C393/291950105510?_trksid=p2050601.c100085.m2372&_trkparms=aid%3D111001%26algo%3DREC.SEED%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D37338%26meid%3D76425285729844ec940a9f19564662bd%26pid%3D100085%26rk%3D1%26rkt%3D4%26sd%3D291950105510%26clkid%3D765534650196745536&_qi=RTM2247625 Quote
Guido Posted November 28, 2016 Report Posted November 28, 2016 Thanks, Simon! Since the link will not work forever, I'm posting the papers here for future reference. Again, different outlay of the paper, different seal, different envelope, different paper (the one in the first post seems to be some kind of thick vat paper), different penmanship. 1 Quote
Guido Posted November 28, 2016 Report Posted November 28, 2016 P.S.: Not that I think the papers coming out of Musashiya are reliable ... Quote
Guido Posted November 28, 2016 Report Posted November 28, 2016 I live in Japan and this was purchased here ... If it's yours, could you please show us the other side of the paper? Quote
Bugyotsuji Posted November 28, 2016 Report Posted November 28, 2016 Who is this Kobayashi San, and how many other experts work with him in this Teppo-Token Kenkyu (Shinsa-i-inkai), I wonder? Quote
Jimmy R Posted November 28, 2016 Author Report Posted November 28, 2016 That is exactly what I am trying to get to the bottom of. I will post pictures of the front of the papers (yes it's mine) and update this thread after I call him in the morning. Quote
Guido Posted November 28, 2016 Report Posted November 28, 2016 Piers, the 美術日本刀保存審査会 bijutsu nihontō hozon shinsakai (of wich nobody has heard before) and the 鉄砲刀剣研究会 teppō tōken kenkyūkai are two different entities. The latter is affiliated with he sword shop むさし屋 Musashiya in Ōsaka. Musashiya’s website doesn’t give us any info on the person issuing the papers, 小林幸信 Kobayashi Yukinobu; however, it has been reported that he is a polisher, and a certain website dealer claims that he used to be an executive director of the NBTHK. I did some research, and he certainly wasn’t a director of the main branch (which the title implies), but I wasn’t able to either confirm or rule out his involvement with any of the local branches. We are dealing here with two different topics: the (previously unheard of) organizations of the original topic, and a possible connection of the second paper with Musashiya (brought up by you, but for which I don’t see any evidence so far). Other than that, Musashiya, and the papers issued by Mr. Kobayashi, are not generally accepted by collectors in Japan. 4 Quote
Carlo Giuseppe Tacchini Posted November 28, 2016 Report Posted November 28, 2016 Great Topic. Might be a sticker ? Quote
Ken-Hawaii Posted November 28, 2016 Report Posted November 28, 2016 Yes, definitely related to http://www.militaria.co.za/nmb/topic/21029-warning-on-ebay-muramasa-blade/!! Ken Quote
Bugyotsuji Posted November 28, 2016 Report Posted November 28, 2016 Thank you for the update Guido. By the way, 門 問 words can often be shortened in that way by Japanese people, when the tick is central, a vertical cross. It is considered to be for strictly informal use. http://m.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/detail/q12117973032 These short forms are to be distinguished from the Chinese tick which is placed in the gap up at the top left. http://m.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/detail/q14129859884 Quote
Jimmy R Posted December 16, 2016 Author Report Posted December 16, 2016 Update on this. I got hung up on by the gentleman. On Musashiya. I even asked him if it was his penmanship on the email I sent. Oh well. I did however find this Norimune in the Nihonto Koza. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.