Johncstroud Posted July 22, 2016 Report Posted July 22, 2016 Not often you find a match to your own sword on ebay!the mei,s are almost exactly same as are the swords.!I still dont know for sure what the kanji reads.but I think its cool. Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted July 22, 2016 Report Posted July 22, 2016 Can't speak to the mei, but the aresenal stamp is Toyokawa Naval Arsenal. Quote
Johncstroud Posted July 22, 2016 Author Report Posted July 22, 2016 Its seems to me that this style of koshirai is more common than I had first thought.I found this photo of a sword factory in Japan courtesy of Fred Lohmans website which Armory was not stated. Quote
Johncstroud Posted July 22, 2016 Author Report Posted July 22, 2016 Does anyone know if this koshirai was used by a specific division ? I know there seems to be much controversy over the so called Naval landing forces swords.could any elaborate as to the year they were made and possibly by whom? I would be ever so grateful. Quote
vajo Posted July 22, 2016 Report Posted July 22, 2016 I saw many of this easy build kai gunto. All prices around $500. The shape of the sword looks terrible for me. Navy and Airforce have two ashi on the saya. This is not a naval ashi. Quote
Johncstroud Posted July 22, 2016 Author Report Posted July 22, 2016 I believe perhaps it was broken and then reground but mine measures 24 3/4 @ the machi mune making them nearly identical in length. Quote
Johncstroud Posted July 22, 2016 Author Report Posted July 22, 2016 Correction the blade on ebay is 1/4 inch shorter. Quote
Johncstroud Posted July 22, 2016 Author Report Posted July 22, 2016 If you have one for sale I would gladly buy it from you for that price! Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted July 23, 2016 Report Posted July 23, 2016 I saw many of this easy build kai gunto. All prices around $500. The shape of the sword looks terrible for me. Navy and Airforce have two ashi on the saya. This is not a naval ashi. While the standard Navy kai-gunto had 2 ashi, this version was quite common, and WAS Navy. I'm on the road and don't have my books, but there are multiple sources that verify this version as Navy. They were believed to have been used by Naval officers stationed on land, working with the Army. The standard statement is that they believed the army fittings would stand up better in land combat. But the fittings were gold-guilded and fitted on navy saya and tsuka. The blades are always kai-gunto blades. Quote
Johncstroud Posted July 23, 2016 Author Report Posted July 23, 2016 I appreciate your response Bruce any info you could pull up on this style of kaigunto is very helpful in unraveling this mystery .it seems there are a few critics.but the important thing is to preserve every piece of history so future generations may benefit no matter how small.Sure wish I could find out more about this smith. He certainly seemed to be quite consistent when you compare the two. Quote
Johncstroud Posted July 23, 2016 Author Report Posted July 23, 2016 I found this kanji symbol that closely matches could someone tell me what it is andif it is the same. Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted July 23, 2016 Report Posted July 23, 2016 John, seems translators are occupied elsewhere for the moment. Have you ever tried the Wehrmacht site? They seem to have more active translators right now. http://www.wehrmacht-awards.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=59 1 Quote
Johncstroud Posted July 24, 2016 Author Report Posted July 24, 2016 I had not seen that one before I will check it out .Thank you Bruce.have another question have you noticed the differences in the toyokawa stamps ? Quote
Brian Posted July 24, 2016 Report Posted July 24, 2016 John, seems translators are occupied elsewhere for the moment. Yep..probably in the translation section. Who woulda thunk it? 1 Quote
Johncstroud Posted July 24, 2016 Author Report Posted July 24, 2016 Duely noted,I was under the impression that the translation section was reserved for nihonto related requests.None the less Thank you. Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted July 24, 2016 Report Posted July 24, 2016 I had not seen that one before I will check it out .Thank you Bruce.have another question have you noticed the differences in the toyokawa stamps ? John, I don't see the difference? Yours looks like it was polished over, which fuzzed out the detail. What is it that looks different to you? Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted July 24, 2016 Report Posted July 24, 2016 Yep..probably in the translation section. Who woulda thunk it? Brian, OMG, thanks for the tip! I've been on this forum for over a year, and never knew about that forum! Dang, there's LOTs of sword stuff going on over there! Quote
Ian B3HR2UH Posted July 25, 2016 Report Posted July 25, 2016 Hi Bruce , I have real doubts that this is a Naval sword . I live in Australia and have looked at thousands of swords that were bought back from the South West Pacific theatre of war and have never seen one of this pattern . It is possible that late in the war the Japanese couldn't get reinforcements through to the south West pacific area which accounts for their absence here .PersonallyI think that they were made in Japan really late in the war or more likely after the war from left over bits and pieces . I would be interested to hear Thomas's views on this . Ian Brooks. 1 Quote
Johncstroud Posted July 25, 2016 Author Report Posted July 25, 2016 I believe mine here in Puerto Rico has the cherry blossoms on the pommel filed off . Also the absence of the rising sun o-seppa Suggest a surrendered blade.in respect to thestamps they seem to be deep struck and then chromed over. the other stamps seem larger with the barbs of the anchor more spread out. Quote
Johncstroud Posted July 25, 2016 Author Report Posted July 25, 2016 Not to mention mine looks like it came out of a jungle! Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted July 25, 2016 Report Posted July 25, 2016 Hi Bruce , I have real doubts that this is a Naval sword . I live in Australia and have looked at thousands of swords that were bought back from the South West Pacific theatre of war and have never seen one of this pattern . It is possible that late in the war the Japanese couldn't get reinforcements through to the south West pacific area which accounts for their absence here .PersonallyI think that they were made in Japan really late in the war or more likely after the war from left over bits and pieces . I would be interested to hear Thomas's views on this .Ian Brooks.Ian, I've heard both theories too - late war production using IJA parts (but why are they gold-guilded?) and piece-together. I'm on the road and don't have my books with me, but I'm pretty sure Dawson or F&G have these discussed as legitimate IJN for land use. I'll update in a couple of days. I'll also check on the rising sun tsuba question. My problem with the "pieced-together" theory is that I've been trying to find pieces to finishe the saya of my dad's Mantetsu saya, and a chuso, and have given up! The variations of size are too great to claim that all the marine-landing gunto I've seen on the market and in collections were successfully fitted together from various parts. I'm posting a pic from a close friend who has one that is, for sure, a gunto collected on Iwo Jima. 1 Quote
Kai-Gunto Posted July 25, 2016 Report Posted July 25, 2016 Its army late war. Shingunto fittings. Stainless steel blades for jungle use. All these swords missing the sun ray seppas. One seppa integrated on the fuchi. Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted July 25, 2016 Report Posted July 25, 2016 Its army late war. Shingunto fittings. Stainless steel blades for jungle use. All these swords missing the sun ray seppas. One seppa integrated on the fuchi. Interesting idea, Thomas, but why would the fittings be gold-guilded, and the nakago has a Toyokawa navy arsenal stamp? Here's another one, identical, on an auction site. Toyokawa Navy Arsenal, gold-guilded army fittings, no rising-sun rays. 1 Quote
Johncstroud Posted July 26, 2016 Author Report Posted July 26, 2016 Whats different with my sword the fuchi is a Naval style fuchi and all the numbers match all 45 matching the symbols on the blade as well. Quote
Johncstroud Posted July 26, 2016 Author Report Posted July 26, 2016 One thing is sure anything that holds its edge for 71 years is one bad mamajama. 1 Quote
sbf Posted July 26, 2016 Report Posted July 26, 2016 I have seen lots of these swords over the years still in the hands of the veterans who brought them back. The swords were always in excellent condition unless they had been stored in a barn or tool shed. Without exception they picked them up in Japan after the war ended. I believe the swords are a late war pattern that was never actually issued, and our occupation troops cleaned out the warehouse. Steve 2 Quote
Kai-Gunto Posted July 26, 2016 Report Posted July 26, 2016 I have seen lots of these swords over the years still in the hands of the veterans who brought them back. The swords were always in excellent condition unless they had been stored in a barn or tool shed. Without exception they picked them up in Japan after the war ended. I believe the swords are a late war pattern that was never actually issued, and our occupation troops cleaned out the warehouse. Steve Sounds right. The swords has all army look and all menukis are the army type. Never seen army menuki on kaigunto. Only civil menuki and tsuba are found.I have never owen one, cus somehow I dont like them. They are like frankenstein, IMO. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.