Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

#1 and #4 above are the same pic. My initial thought is fake. The Tokyo canon mark is not done well; the dimples on the tsuka are not correct, and the release latch is not at the right angle.

 

John C.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted

Textbook fake with all the red flags.  For sale on ebay, not even going to post the link.

Don't even have to enlarge on each section of the sword.  I could see from the expanded shot that the haikan was mounted too far down the saya, for starters:

Screenshot2025-01-06075751.thumb.png.9f8b9d07ddda6ed3f7d16af7f1146c27.png

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I'm posting this one for those trying to learn to spot fakes.  It has several things right, which might tempt a new guy to fall for it, like:

- Serial number is posted cutting edge down as Tokyo blade should

- Latch is curved properly vs the angled bend you see on many fakes

- Suya and Kokura stamps aren't bad, in as much as you can see the Suya one

- Bohi beginning is a little sloppy but not bad

 

But other things are wrong, first of which, glaringly, is the brass tsuka!  These are often sold as a copper handled 95, but they are not.

Other issues:

- Tokyo stamp on blade is FAR too far from the serial number

- Bohi end is not shaped properly for a Tokyo blade

- Tokyo inspector stamp on fuchi is really bad

- Fine details of tsuka and tsuba dimples, seppa sculpting, kabutogane, are all course, flat; probably an attempt to make it look worn and used

- The tsuba has a dark coating to make it look aged

 

Photos at first glance
H4091-L395718885_original.thumb.jpg.c4ce17b45c6d1c2f62d1ba12f1be2b42.jpg

H4091-L395718894_original.thumb.jpg.3ac2a1e9661e70c5978cd6762d024a08.jpg

H4091-L395718883_original.thumb.jpg.af0954ee6aa517f432dc425a4d18c0bb.jpg

 

Zooming in for detail:

Screenshot2025-01-31073545.thumb.png.2a311e59e81a5036eef11a27419af5b1.png

Screenshot2025-01-31073711.thumb.png.cf1494a286dd4f75cb88b72c5249d3d5.png

Screenshot2025-01-31073629.thumb.png.887b635c47dfbf55824249133b9caedf.png

Screenshot2025-01-31073750.thumb.png.094cba2a3fa86022b355f5199905d758.png

Screenshot2025-01-31073827.thumb.png.55919b5e6d867b838d45a81f6d555216.png

 

 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Bruce I'm not sure with this that is a fake. I would need better pictures.

From my point the nanako is not inverse which shows mostly fakes. The menuki looks sharp. The hi looks nearly correct. 

The number looks not bad.

The seppa has the original looking cherry blossoms on the rim.

The clipper looks authentic.

 

I'm not sure.

 

If its fake its one of the best fakes i saw so far.

Thanks a lot for showing it Bruce.

Really cool.

 

By the way i would not buy it because of its brass tsuka :)

  • Like 2
Posted

The menuki, screw, tsuka nanako, etc. are all the same color. Could it be aluminum painted gold-ish rather than brass? Looks like brass, however it would be crazy heavy. Too bad we can't weigh it.

 

John C.

Screenshot 2025-01-31 at 7.52.55 AM.png

Posted

I agree about the kissaki, and I'm inclined to believe it's a fake... Although, fakes this good are concerning! 

Something to consider about 95 blade geometry is that there are reports that some Type32 blades were converted for 95 use. Allegedly they were reshaped and reformed to closer mimic the 95 specs. 

I have personally never seen an example of this - and I don't think this sword is one. But my point is: judging on blade geometry alone can be tricky.

This "brass tsuka" sword is one of those potential fakes that I'd really like to see in-hand.
Cheers,
-Sam

Type32vs95bladeWIDTH.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

After looking deeper on PC on those pictures i go with Bruce its a total fake sword. But its a very good made. With some nice paint job it could fool me.

  • Like 2
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Spotted on eBay. What are your thoughts on this one?

 

Looks right at a glance… Convincing even from afar. Then you dig a little deeper and see those oddly sized stamps (especially kokura cannonball stamp), and crusty looking tsuka. A funny looking washer on the mekugi. Also, it doesn't align with swords that I have listed with near serial numbers. 
 

The more I look the more it looks wrong. 

Beware!

-Sam 

IMG_5179.jpeg

IMG_5188.jpeg

IMG_5186.jpeg

IMG_5187.jpeg

IMG_5181.jpeg

IMG_5182.jpeg

IMG_5184.jpeg

IMG_5180.jpeg

Posted

Agreed, Sam. The marks aren't even close; the bohi does not end in the correct shape, the tsuba is the wrong shape (should be flat where the center ridge is on that one); tsuka looks like brass rather than aluminum.

 

John C.

  • Like 1
Posted

Stamps are crappola, tsuka screws are wrong.  

 

The blade serial is stamped in the correct orientation (cutting edge up) for a Nagoya blade, but Nagoya stamped the saya throat numbers in the same manner - at the 'bottom' of the throat, with latch loop to the right:

Example Nagoya blade number

20200531_082439.thumb.jpg.521e88a638c3dbc57d93f5f0faa11f53.jpg

Note: Nagoya bohi normally are more tapered both at beginning and end, but there are some that show up with rounded beginning

 

Example Nagoya saya throat

IMG_2133.thumb.jpg.3519c5b4903d1b8d09dd40670b825e18.jpg

Number at bottom when reading, latch loop to right

  • Like 1
Posted

I’ve actually seen this fake before, with identical serial numbers. Hard to know if it’s the same exact fake sword, or if there are many out there with the same number.  I suspect the latter. 

 

When I saw the thumbnail of the whole sword, I clicked to see if it was one I could catalog. So at first glance it fooled me! But only for a moment, until I saw the other photos and saw them full sized. 
 

Ive begun keeping a separate list of some of the regular fakes that I see too. 
-Sam 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Just got done reading through this whole thread again. Quite eye-opening! There are a few of those brass handle examples in the earlier pages. 

One thing that I noticed in some of the early pages, something not otherwise mentioned as a "fake identifier" - is that some of the fake swords have a pretty steep / exaggerated IORIMUNE. And this feature is mirrored on the scabbard mouth. 

The ^ shape on some of these fakes is steep; while the genuine examples I’ve encountered it’s not. 

Just an observation that I'm curious if anyone else has noted. 
-Sam

iori1.jpeg
 

Different fake sword’s saya below:

iorimune1.jpeg

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...