rkg Posted May 27, 2016 Report Posted May 27, 2016 Hi, I haven't posted any sword images here in a while, so here's a test shot I did of my Kunisuke naginata. I was in the process of testing a lens (sigma 50mm 1.4 art). Sorry about not showing the other side, but I had limited time and the rig was set up to shoot this side, and... http://www.rkgphotos.com/facebook_stuff/kunisuke_nag_test.jpg Best, rkg (Richard George) 8 Quote
Gilles Posted May 27, 2016 Report Posted May 27, 2016 For a test shot it's a very beautiful one. Congratulations. Quote
Brian Posted May 27, 2016 Report Posted May 27, 2016 :clap: Stunning photo. You really capture everything. Quote
Fuuten Posted May 27, 2016 Report Posted May 27, 2016 Well above average quality on the net I'd say. Excellent shot! Sharp and revealing. Edit: fantastic naginata too! Gorgeous sugata! Quote
vajo Posted May 27, 2016 Report Posted May 27, 2016 Fantastic picture!! Is there any "how to make better sword photos" for a rookie like me in the board? Quote
christianmalterre Posted May 27, 2016 Report Posted May 27, 2016 i do think not...Laugh! Rich just does want to let you learn....and show how it could like... Christian Quote
Darcy Posted May 27, 2016 Report Posted May 27, 2016 On 5/27/2016 at 5:19 PM, rkg said: Hi, I haven't posted any sword images here in a while, so here's a test shot I did of my Kunisuke naginata. I was in the process of testing a lens (sigma 50mm 1.4 art). Sorry about not showing the other side, but I had limited time and the rig was set up to shoot this side, and... http://www.rkgphotos.com/facebook_stuff/kunisuke_nag_test.jpg Best, rkg (Richard George) It's an excessively difficult subject and you pulled it off with perfect results. Just my opinion for what it's worth. 1 Quote
Darcy Posted May 27, 2016 Report Posted May 27, 2016 On 5/27/2016 at 7:01 PM, vajo said: Fantastic picture!! Is there any "how to make better sword photos" for a rookie like me in the board? Richard and I started developing nihonto photography together .... 15 years ago? Given that nobody was telling us anything. We exchanged ideas and kept poking away. Richard went and learned great ways of doing kodogu and I kept on with swords. There is no way you can just get a brain dump from either of us to give you this kind of result. Even if we told you everything you would have to practice it for years. When a blade comes out looking natural and beautiful as he shot it, you guys react and can see it's beautiful. What I see is every major trap that was set by this blade that he did not fall into. This is a very hard blade to shoot. To come out like this is highly admirable. Not a lot of people are doing things as we do. What we do is honest and hard. I have been training Ted for half a decade as well. A lot just use a scanner and you see a flat deadish looking thing that has been enhanced severely with photoshop because the scanner does not see what the eye sees so they have to make some illusions. This kind of photography is an artform. It is constantly improving as both technical skills and artistic merit increase and experiments are done. It is excellent work. I can highly recommend having Richard shoot your swords. and it's nice to have for your wall or for one day when you sell it to be able to use an image like this so someone else can see what you have. Vs. the nightmare shots you will take with your point and shoot. If you really want to shoot like this set aside 15 years, a lot of blood, swear and tears and be prepared to learn from your mistakes. Easier to just send to Richard and ask him to shoot your blade. There are only 3 people in North America who can do this correctly now, I think. Me and Ted and Richard. Everything else is a grade less at best. Some of these people grabbed spilled knowledge I threw out there when I thought it was all about people helping people. Without that they'd not have been able to leverage out of the bottom rungs. Richard's work was peer work and his insights helped me a lot and I hope mine helped him too. He is an expert and especially in tosogo. 6 Quote
vajo Posted May 28, 2016 Report Posted May 28, 2016 Sorry for my asking, i didn't know that making good sword photos is a treasure. I don't wanted to be a competitor. I only wanted some explanations. But it is ok. Quote
Jim P Posted May 28, 2016 Report Posted May 28, 2016 Chris, Did you read this in Articles? http://www.rkgphotos.com/articles/ktk_photo_document_2012.pdf Or do a search of the board a lot has been posted on this . 1 Quote
rkg Posted May 28, 2016 Author Report Posted May 28, 2016 Wow... Thank you for the shout out Darcy - I just try and do my best... Yeah, that was a while ago... And actually, the quality of Darcy's work on swords is what I aspire to now. Chris, the short answer is that its a pain to do - you are basically photographing a mirror, which can be challenging. There are several different ways to light pieces, depending on what you want to see or not see, how the piece has been polished, etc. And while they are actually a little more "formulaic" than tosogu, you -still- sometimes end up having to stop and experiment, change lighting methods (sometimes radically), etc depending on the piece. You only "know" how to shoot a particular type of piece until the next one comes in with some different peculiarity that usually doesn't hit you until you have that "WTF!!!??" moment when you look at the images on the screen... About all I can offer is that its all about light control... A lot of what passes for good images seem to be a compromise between showing enough to get the piece sold while minimizing problems. Here's an example - this is a piece I bought last fall. This shows three images, the seller's and two of mine which I downsized to match in size. One is one of my really high resolution images (it looks a little darker because I had processed it differently (to display large)) and the other was a another test image using the sigma lens (I know, I can call it the "eye of Raw" ) - I didn't bother to clean the image up as it was a test, pretty dusty, I screwed up and there's a gobo shadow on the nakago, etc). And before you get on my case, the seller's image WAS marked as public domain, so....: http://www.rkgphotos.com/facebook_stuff/yasuaki_compare.jpg The seller's image doesn't show (either at all or so it "registers") all the little nicks in the blade up by up by the shinogi line in the monouchi area and a bit below, it becomes more painfully obvious that the maker was doing a hosho utushi (ware/loose hada in habaki area, though to be fair you quite often see this -somewhere- on a period hosho piece), and my favorite - the thumbprint. On the other hand, you also don't see the activities/cool hada very well either - its actually pretty nice in hand... And Darcy's point about photoshopped pieces is sage Some are really bad - the one that sticks out in my mind is a Nambokucho period wakizashi that was sold on a (now deceased) dealer's website with glorious images - Darcy actually ended up reselling it later as a consignment, and in his images it almost looked like a different piece as Darcy's images told the truth - the originals were apparently either heavily photoshopped to remove issues/lit to hide problems/something. I wish I had saved the images for my own reference. On that note, I guess I should also point out that on the Kunisuke above, there is a masking error on the mune I didn't as clean up (the jaggies) - ya gotta love being in a hurry I guess... Best, rkg (Richard George) 1 Quote
Jean Posted May 28, 2016 Report Posted May 28, 2016 Very good Richard, I have the tutorial Darcy's edited years ago, I shall never use it but I like reading it to see all the obstacles one must face to photo a nihonto. Congrats to you,Ted and Darcy. 1 Quote
vajo Posted May 29, 2016 Report Posted May 29, 2016 Jim, thank you for sharing this link. It is very interesting. regards Chris Quote
Jim P Posted May 29, 2016 Report Posted May 29, 2016 Hi Chris, I think we should thank Richard for taking the time to write it. Quote
Alan F Posted May 30, 2016 Report Posted May 30, 2016 Just use a scanner, Vajo. It's a lot easier and much less time consuming. Then you won't have to be told to "shut it down on the NMB" regarding photography tips. Alan Quote
w.y.chan Posted May 30, 2016 Report Posted May 30, 2016 On 5/27/2016 at 7:01 PM, vajo said: Fantastic picture!! Is there any "how to make better sword photos" for a rookie like me in the board? You can try exclude ambient light to prevent the reflective surface of the blade bouncing light back so shoot in dark room. Place lighting so it comes in at an angle on the blade to capture the blade details so you be better off using several lights that covers left, right, top and bottom. There are other techniques that involve flags to block stray lights. You can experiment starting with a small blade. You don't even need a super expensive dSLR or expensive lens, the lighting is the key. Wah Quote
CSM101 Posted May 30, 2016 Report Posted May 30, 2016 No. Lightning is just a factor. The BLADE is the key. Uwe G. Quote
w.y.chan Posted May 30, 2016 Report Posted May 30, 2016 On 5/30/2016 at 6:25 AM, CSM101 said: No. Lightning is just a factor. The BLADE is the key. Uwe G. You are right Quote
w.y.chan Posted May 30, 2016 Report Posted May 30, 2016 Richard's photos are excellent and one would expect a lot of trial and error to succeed to shoot something like what we usually see in books and I could not blame him if actual technique are kept, as someone said it is indeed an artform. This may not look as nice. It is just a frame grab from a video footage I was grading for a potential nihonto trailer. As lighting goes this is completely the opposite with plenty of ambient lights being overpowered by a very strong light behind me, this method reveals the jigane but not the hamon. I've included a pyrotechnic while exploring a possibility of adding special effect http://m1.i.pbase.com/o9/86/459686/1/163336331.pKxuB1Eo.ScreenShot20160530at09.49.04.png Wah Quote
Brian Posted May 30, 2016 Report Posted May 30, 2016 On 5/30/2016 at 3:32 AM, Alan F said: Just use a scanner, Vajo. It's a lot easier and much less time consuming. Then you won't have to be told to "shut it down on the NMB" regarding photography tips. Alan Resorting to old habits? Quote
Stephen Posted May 30, 2016 Report Posted May 30, 2016 does Moses do his own photo work, how about Ed? short list is good but does it need to be that short? Quote
Marius Posted May 30, 2016 Report Posted May 30, 2016 Richard, you are a master! Only those who have tried to photograph nihonto have an idea how much experience and work is needed to deliver such results. Your picture is absolutely impressive. WOW! 1 Quote
vajo Posted May 30, 2016 Report Posted May 30, 2016 On 5/30/2016 at 3:32 AM, Alan F said: Just use a scanner, Vajo. It's a lot easier and much less time consuming. Then you won't have to be told to "shut it down on the NMB" regarding photography tips. Alan My english is too bad to understand clearly what you wrote. Sorry... Quote
Jean Posted May 30, 2016 Report Posted May 30, 2016 Stephen, Yes big Mo does his own photos. Years ago when I ordered him my Tsunahiro, upon my request, he sent me a picture of his studio. 1 Quote
Alan F Posted May 30, 2016 Report Posted May 30, 2016 On 5/30/2016 at 2:20 PM, vajo said: My english is too bad to understand clearly what you wrote. Sorry... Hoffentlich nicht. Das war ein Insider-Witz, in schlechten Geschmack. (Hopefully not. That was an insider joke, in poor taste) Richard's photo is impressive. At first glance, one might think that it was a scan. But when one realizes that it was a photo taken with a good camera, you have to appreciate that there was much experimentation with regard to the perfect lighting setup (and camera settings). Alan Quote
Darcy Posted May 31, 2016 Report Posted May 31, 2016 On 5/27/2016 at 7:01 PM, vajo said: Fantastic picture!! Is there any "how to make better sword photos" for a rookie like me in the board? Start 15 years ago and keep practicing. It's what Rich did. And me. Quote
Darcy Posted May 31, 2016 Report Posted May 31, 2016 On 5/30/2016 at 11:40 PM, Alan F said: Richard's photo is impressive. At first glance, one might think that it was a scan. But when one realizes that it was a photo taken with a good camera, you have to appreciate that there was much experimentation with regard to the perfect lighting setup (and camera settings). Alan Richard is a highly talented photographer who also does amazing pro style photographs of kodogu that would be suitable for publishing in any Japanese publication. This is as you guess a result of much experimentation. A decade and plus work goes into being able to take a photo like that unless someone is going to take you by the hand and walk you through everything that is important. And nobody did that for Rich. The big trick is that you need to care about it enough to devote the time and the brain power to trying to get it perfect. It's the most ridiculously awful photography subject I've encountered in my entire life, trying to get a sword to photograph well. Quote
Bazza Posted June 1, 2016 Report Posted June 1, 2016 I have a friend whose hobby is high definition, large scale black and white photography. At work one day (long ago) he said he was looking for a new challenge. I suggested Japanese swords and lent him one of mine. Despite his clear talent in the medium and style of his choice after some considerable time he gave it up and returned the sword, mission unaccomplished. I have another friend whose wife is a talented photographer and wants to "do" one of my swords. I just know it isn't going to work out... BaZZa. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.