Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Heres my large and small kaigunto.

The small one has 2 stamps on the seppa. One for Toyokawa (anchor in sakura) and the other is company logo (Gunto Sei Saku Jo)

 

Located in Tokyo. The company was owned by Mr. Matsuyama. This firm made koshirae for both army and navy, as well as koshirae for police, diplomatic, and ceremonial uses.

post-1265-0-67542500-1455321258_thumb.jpeg

post-1265-0-27803500-1455322587_thumb.jpeg

  • Like 2
Posted

I've owned & seen many short army service dress swords. These certainly aren't for airmen or tankers! I don't buy the myth. Let's face it some Japanese were very short! Other cases are short family blades used for gunto.

  • Like 2
Posted

lets just forget the last post, because were not talking about short dress swords.

 

THIS IS THE CLASSIC "non" pilots/crew gunto.

 

rebound handle, crappy tsuba, no correct shin gunto menuki and the saya is pre ww1. (kurikata)

 

IMHO "put togeather crap"

 

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Japanese-WWll-Army-pilot-sword-in-combat-mounting-Hisamitsu-old-family-blade-/231852282268?hash=item35fb79119c:g:RJwAAOSwx-9WySIG

  • Like 1
Posted

Dave, forget the dam bloody blade, the topic I started has no bearing on the blade, its all about the pilots gunto koshire. FORGET THE BLOODY FAMILY BLADE, its a misconstrued term anyway.

 

its all about the fittings, I was pointing out to those who may not be familiar with "put to geather jobs".

just look at the length of the tsuka, the bad modern binding, the basic fittings, not being shin gunto. incorrect menuki.

 

just like a 1883 admirals flag sword koshire, its most likely more scarce then the blade housed inside

  • Like 1
Posted

 Oh well, I thought we were looking at possible origins of "so called pilot swords" in general! However  here are some pictures of small Gunto in wear. Fred Lohman reckons that this is the origin of most of them.

post-2218-0-61520000-1456315958_thumb.jpg

post-2218-0-83960100-1456315972_thumb.jpg

post-2218-0-79749900-1456315996_thumb.jpg

Posted

Thank you for that short article upload anyways Dave. It clarifies a lot about the number of older wakizashi I have seen only having added ashi and combat cover. Makes sense.

  • Like 1
Posted

Yes, a very interesting topic and thank you all for contributing. I think the is a lot more debate needed around these swords but there is really little known.

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...