Jump to content

Muramasa Katana On Aoi


Recommended Posts

As I was driving out then I was thinking there may be another reason, one would think a big name would pull a few strings:)

 

The latest standards do seem to indicate that allowances will be made for famous smiths, however this sword was papered in 2013. At the time I believe Hozon was the best it could achieve and it may not have been resubmitted this year to attempt higher papers against the amended rules.

 

http://nihontocraft.com/2015_NBTHK_Nionto_Tosogu_Shinsa_Standards.html

 

- Ray

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who thinks it's silly to base a rating of TH or Juyo on whether or not a mei is present?  Just my opinion, but it seems like the quality of the work and the state of the blade's condition are what matters most.  History will have its way with swords just like everything else.  That doesn't meant the quality isn't there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would consider the preservation of a nakago in its ubu signed form as a factor in evaluating its condition. I also agree with the NBTHK that more leeway should be given to older swords in this respect, and that modification in Muromachi and later swords is less acceptable. Tokubetsu Hozon and Juyo are also about the rarity of the sword and its value as an important reference example. That is why tired early koto swords will sometimes pass Juyo, if there is valuable reference material contained in the nakago.

 

Ray

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judge the work, not the paper.

Study quality and then you'll know it when you see it.

I think this is why it's important to study good swords. They have attributes that lesser swords just don't have.

I personally don't see the hamon running off the blade. Close near the hamachi but not bad in comparison to some of his other blades I've seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 As we know, Muramasa blades commonly had signatures removed or obscured. 

Please refer to http://markussesko.com/2014/03/14/the-muramasa-ban-and-signature-alterations/

I think that this practice with his specific swords should be reflected in the policy of the NBTHK.  As of today, however, they will not issue Tokubetsu Hozon, as Muramasa is considered a Muromachi smith.  (As Ray noted)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Derek,

It is true that Muramasa smiths were considered Muromachi smiths and hence they would normally be excluded from ToHo. However there is also the exception granted to famous smiths (so a mumei M. blade or Edo blade by a famous smith might still receive ToHo papers, theoretically, if in excellent condition).

 

What is your personal experience? Did you try (and succeed) with your Muramasa blade with the partially obscured (but still distinguishable) mei? That will be an informative precedent.

Thank you for sharing your experience in advance.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally don't see the hamon running off the blade. Close near the hamachi but not bad in comparison to some of his other blades I've seen.

 

Here's a few images of it.

The hamon does not completely vanish, but the last polish likely took away its full character at this one spot near the hamachi.

post-2184-0-35918600-1444569857_thumb.png

post-2184-0-53318100-1444569868_thumb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The attribution of Muramasa is the sizzle that sells the steak, true.  That said, the work looks quite good and I personally like it for that, though not enough to pay over 4 million yen for it.  

 

Consider also that a nice zaimei daito by Muramasa would be a multiple of the current price.  Daito by Muramasa are quite rare in any state. Muramasa is also a Saijo saku maker which also pretty rarified air.    

 

If I recall correctly a Juyo zaimei sold for over $100k+ not long ago.  So the fact that they were regularly altered does indeed diminish their achievable tier of paper when mumei, but also propels the zaimei ones to higher prices because a zaimei Muramasa is more desirable among the entire body of Muramasa works, which in turn, must be compared to each other in terms of overall blade health and condition regardless of mei or lack thereof.  The Hozon authentication of it as a Muramasa becomes the flying buttress for it's desirability and a Tokubetsu Hozon paper wouldn't bring a great deal more to the party in my opinion.  If it were Tokubetsu Hozon (meaning zaimei) then the question would be "will it go Juyo?" and now it becomes a deeper question of condition of the blade.  So is a zaimei sword of weaker condition that is Tokuho worth more than a nicer condition mumei?  I think this is where equilibrium manifests itself between them and where we see the break in the belief that paper level leads to price level, and demonstrates that while papers can add value, they also don't act as a singular force that drives pricing or defines rarity or quality in absolute terms.  

 

Also consider that there is an element of mystique to a "muramasa" and comparable examples of similar emotional draw can be found in just about every other gendre of collecting.  It's the intangible, subjective, emotional element that is the romance of collecting, and carries with it a price multiplier that is individual to each individual collector.  Auctions are the perfect environment for eliciting those innate price multipliers.

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I predict that we will see 5 million yen when it hammers.  Supply and demand folks.

Muramasa is one of the few smiths who are known beyond the sword community.  I agree with everything Ted said.  I know that a Tokubetsu signed daito sold early this year for $110,000 from a dealer in Japan that I was speaking to.  It was beautiful, and probably will go Juyo. 

I have many people outside of sword collectors that email my site asking if I know for any Muramasa swords that are available....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Muramasa is definitely present in popular culture, so I can understand the mass appeal.  My first experience with the name Muramasa was probably in the early 90s with the Final Fantasy video games series.  It's generally the 2nd best sword for ninja or samurai in the games, while Masamune is always the best.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...