Jump to content

Study piece - help wanted


Moley

Recommended Posts

Hi Ken,

All this got me thinking.

Whilst putting it all back together last night, the Nakago did indeed feel

"a bit small" for the chunky blade's balance.

So it might be suriage after all. If that is the case, then the blade would have had yaki-dashi?

(Also click on "blade" attachment and you can see what I mean)

post-2722-14196951463095_thumb.jpg

post-2722-14196951463891_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the blade is suriage. The hamon looks like something one might see in a Shinto Mino or Mino derived work, like Owari or Echizen.

 

I asked about a yakidashi because those are common in Edo and Osaka Shinto works. Without one, it narrows things down a bit....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the blade is suriage. The hamon looks like something one might see in a Shinto Mino or Mino derived work, like Owari or Echizen.

 

I asked about a yakidashi because those are common in Edo and Osaka Shinto works. Without one, it narrows things down a bit....

 

 

Thanks Chris,

Nakago just felt a bit small for the balance. Not too bad with tsuka on. It’s a fairly big blade at 72 cm and 31.5 at the hamachi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

Sorry, don't mean to be intrusive and a nag here. However, I don't know if it's just the images, my computer screen, or my eyes, but I am not seeing any activity in this sword that would indicate it has a hamon, no nioi line, no nie.

Please shoot me down as I would like nothing more than to be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

Sorry, don't mean to be intrusive and a nag here. However, I don't know if it's just the images, my computer screen, or my eyes, but I am not seeing any activity in this sword that would indicate it has a hamon, no nioi line, no nie.

Please shoot me down as I would like nothing more than to be wrong.

 

on the photo in the second post if you look on the left hand side you may just be able to make out the faintest Nioi line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

on the photo in the second post if you look on the left hand side you may just be able to make out the faintest Nioi line.

 

.jpg]

 

This I take is what you're pointing out (thanks). Although this makes me think it is possibly nioi here, skepticism remains. Even if faint, would like to see what this nioi looks like with light bouncing off(?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Jean,

You guys are great.

This is what I've managed to comply so far; (any more help GREATLY appreciated)

 

Katana

 

Blade:

Period:

Mei: Mumei

Sugata: Shinogi Zukuri

Nagasa: (Length from Mune Machi to Kissagi) 28.5 inches (71.5 cm)

Nakago: Ubu, (Unsigned) 7.75 inches (19.5 cm),

Nakago Jiri (Tip of tang shape ) is Iriyamagata Jiri,

One mekugi-ana.

The yasurime (File marks) are Katte Sagari

Kissaki: O - Kissaki

Moto-haba (Blade width near Habaki: 1.25 inches (3.2 cm).

Moto-kasane: (Blade thickness at the Hamachi) 0.35 inches (0.9cm).

Saki-haba (Blade width at the Yokote): 1 inches (2.5cm).

Saki-Kasane: (Blade thickness at the Yokote) 0.25 inches (4 mm).

Sori (Curvature) : Torii Sori (near centre) 0.78 inches (2cm)

Hamon: Yahazu midare (uneven arrow notch, or fishtail) Mino were known for this

Hada: Masame

Blade condition: Excellent. In good polish with only minor pin head openings.

Mounts: Higo mounts. Fuchi fine gold details of leaves, Menuki are of Dragons on a Ken (sword)

The tsuka is fully wrapped in samekawa and has a black silk tsumami-maki binding.

The tsuba is of Twin Cranes entwined.

post-2722-14196951809027_thumb.jpg

post-2722-14196951817244_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello, from the moto kasane image it doesn't appear to have been polished down much based on the width difference at the nakago. From the saki kasane there is not much of a flair which could mean a number of things including; more typical of an older blade (would say early Edo period in your case), or possibly a polisher removed the flair (in which case, why?), but I don't think that is the case. Part of analyzing one's blade is the attempt to figure out what this blade looked like originally from how it appears today. Which is more reason to learn, study, and recognize excellent swords with excellent polishing work.

 

BTW, those 2 notches on the top edge of the nakago are likely to be assembly marks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...