Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My friend was offered this blade recently and had a few questions regarding it. Any help would be greatly appreciated. He's trying to determine originality so he can make a fair offer. TIA.

 

1) are the signatures Gimei or authentic?

2) is there a way to tell which honami appraiser signed the sword?

3) why only one mei per side?

 

Here's a few picture he sent me of the mei and blade.

post-4282-14196941589983_thumb.jpg

post-4282-14196941593973_thumb.jpg

post-4282-14196941595986_thumb.jpg

post-4282-14196941600079_thumb.jpg

post-4282-14196941602541_thumb.jpg

Posted

careful Christian

While I can agree the attribution is less than likely to be genuine I can't see enough detail in the sword to write it off so easily.

If a faker hoped to fool a potential buyer the blade should have at least some of the attributes of the named smith. Who can say from what we can see that this isnt an attempted copy?

Posted

Christian,

That was uncalled for :shame:

You know better than that.

Yes..gimei of the big name Sa. Your friend should evaluate it as any mumei sword and price it accordingly.

 

Brian

Posted

No offense was taken here by any of the comments. The help is greatly appreciated and I will refer him to this thread so he can base his offer accordingly. He and I are mainly military collectors and we severely struggle with anything beyond WWII. Thanks again for all the help!

Posted

While the vast majority of swords with "Sa" mei are gimei, one does come across a gem once in a blue moon. Here is a naginata naoshi with a "Sa" kinzogan mei. At first blush, the kinzogan mei looks pretty questionable, but this sword does have NBTHK Hozon paper dated 1986 (new NBTHK system) with Sue Sa attribution, and the workmanship is exceptional. What's more impressive is that Hozon was issued without having to remove the kinzogan mei.

 

Regards,

Hoanh

post-3198-14196941615185_thumb.jpg

Posted

Brandon,

 

Time to acquire some automatism..

 

Your answer to your friend should have been immediate.

 

What should have it been?

Posted
Brandon,

 

Time to acquire some automatism..

 

Your answer to your friend should have been immediate.

 

What should have it been?

 

"Buy the blade, not the signature." :)

Posted

i am very sorry "if you did not understand mine wording"!

 

this questioned topic "iron" is worth ONLY so to throw it straightaway!(i do repeat me),in an recycling container

this is no sword-this is a joke!

this is falsation of art!

this is gimei in it´s metallurgy,hamon,hada or what else you like to get in input...(in words,explaining an Japanese art sword)!

plus! it´s falsation of an well known seal of experts apreciating quality and genuinity !

so in sum -an criminal falsation of honesty passion and artwork!

 

no further comment needed i think!

 

????????

what´s this getting for an collectors world meanwhile?

ebay mentality....

(????)

Christian

Posted

What a nonsense Christian !

 

You call for things that you might think are proper with this sword, call it old iron, throw it away, falsifying art while totally

ignoring that the sword itself might still be a decent piece, notwithstanding someone tried their hands on a mei and kao at one time in its history which was not all too good of a job anyway. However, what forger would use real Gold for this mei and Kao ?

 

Any knowledge of the price of Gold trhough the ages and especially during the Edo period ? Probably not.

 

First test if the gold in the signature is real gold, what Karat. Then decide if it is gimei or not (which it most likely is).

 

But even before that (as Jean correctly points out) Look at the blade. Does it have activity ? Is it genuine ? Is there something there ? If so, and one likes it, buy it. If not, leave it.

 

But simply throwing this into a recycle bin or in the rubbish is not at all an aesthetic way of thinking and it also does not show one bit of respect to the sword, its possible heritage, history and the smith who might factually have forged it.

 

Do you do that also with tsuba ? See one you do not like on a show and tell the seller to dump it in the bin ? Or buy a tsuba which you do not like and throw it in the canal ?

 

Sorry, but that is not the way to look at antiques in my opinion.

 

KM

Posted

More pics of the blade please and a few stats length etc... btw one of the first things I learned on this site was there are several more Sa's than just THE Sa. I wonder if any of those have been removed as gimei. Also I am not able to judge a signature by the sword, so... yeah.

Posted

The first thing that one should notice is that the blade is suriage/o-suriage and the "Sa" signature is a latter addition. It looks very amateurish and I think most will recognize this for what it is straight away...

 

Throw it in the trash? Nah, throw it on ebay!

Posted

Yes Brandon, so no need for any question :D

 

Your question must be considered as a factual inquiry but by no eans can help establishing a price.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...