Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The hamon looks to be very active so I took a bet on this. I'm crossing my fingers that no flaws will show up....I'm thinking Chris Osborne or Hofhine for polish but I'm not sure yet

Posted

Hi Paul,

I used to have a blade by this man (if they are the same...my jiri was different). A good gendaito, although I thought the hamon looked a bit "weak". Yours looks very strong and clear.

I attach a rubbing, although it is hard to see the mei, It is signed:

Noshu Seki Ju Gensaburo Kanekami Saku. (I think that is the reading). The chiselling is very fine.

If they are the same man he was Koketsu Gensaburo Kanekami. He was registered at Seki on Sho 15 year July 25th. I have him listed as RJT but I don't know where I got that from. Mine was in Navy mounts.

Hope this helps,

post-787-14196921350185_thumb.jpeg

Posted

Hi,

 

OMG!

I will correct the past posting, Not Kanekami,but Kanetaka.

 

Atached pic below is Honma's Nihonto Meikan.

He has pronounced this two kanji characters(兼上) as Kanetaka.

post-191-14196921560055_thumb.jpg

Posted

Hi Morita san,

I had his name as Kanetaka also (see oshigata) but somehow I changed it to kami. I see in the page (Nihonto Meikan p.148) he is RJT.

Thanks for your correction.

Hi Paul, Yes looks like a good find.

Regards,

Posted

We should not ignore the possibility that Homma Sensei's Meikan does not always list the correct reading for a smith's name. Many times (most perhaps), as we have seen here, there is more than one reading for a kanji. Sometimes the only way to know absolutely which reading is correct is from first hand information from the smith or his family. I have come across this a few times; for example, Kato Masakuni 真国, which can be read also as Sanekuni, is listed on page 382 under the Sanekuni reading, with the Masakuni reading underneath. The correct reading, as I have been told by three of his relatives (two were nephews that worked with him) is in fact Masakuni. This is something that bears keeping in mind.

Posted

I do wish there's more information on the various RJT, especially since they're the main smiths producing nihonto during that time period and some can be quite exceptional.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

So the sword came in today. Everything Looks good but the blade definitely needs a polish. Fist gunto mount I have that the lock is still perfectly tight and working. An interesting thing is that both the nagako and nagasa is not a perfect fit onto the mount with both being shorter (It's a short blade at just a tad over 24'). Is this a common thing since the koshirae are standarized and mass produced?

 

Dated november 1944 I think

 

Pictures here: http://imgur.com/a/OnqcP

 

So in the end, is koketsu kanekami and koketsu kanetaka the same person and the pronunciation is just different?

 

On this page(http://www.japaneseswordindex.com/seki.htm) it has the signature as being kanekami but koketsu kanetaka also exists as well so it's a tad confusing.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...