Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A friend of mine showed me this fuchi and wanted a translation and maybe an okay for the signature.

 

I find the quality so poor, that I can only say gimei. But I have no further informations and so I ask for confirmation.

 

Thank you

 

 

Uwe G.

post-1172-14196887160264_thumb.jpg

post-1172-14196887167954_thumb.jpg

post-1172-14196887182946_thumb.jpg

Posted

Uwe,

Why would you say poor quality?

Nanako doesn't have to be tiny to be well done. As long as they are uniform and straight, they can be well done. In this case, they look well punched, and the lines are straight and true. I wouldn't call it a masterpiece, but certainly not poor quality?

 

Brian

Posted

Morning,

 

well, the shishi looks more like a gremlin to me. But I only found this example in the indernet and when I make a comparison....just poor. And with the different "Masa" came the gimei.

 

Uwe G.

post-1172-1419688725731_thumb.jpg

post-1172-14196887258107_thumb.jpg

Posted

Has to be two seperate artisits signing with Nomura Masahide. The last pic looks distinctly Ishiguro school work; the first generic. John

The different kao and the alternate 英 for 'hide' assures it, I believe. J

Posted

John

 

While both of Uwe’s two postings are of fuchi-gashira with mei of Nomura Masahide, the first artist is Haynes’

H 03936.0, while the second is H 03944.0, the eighth master of the Nomura family line. Both kao are illustrated by Haynes, and both works appear to be genuine.

 

John L.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...