Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just received my two swords back from NBTHK shinsa, with new polish by Bob Benson. One sword is by Bitchu Yasuhiro with Hozon papers. I'll post pictures in the next couple days for your enjoyment. The other is a mumei daito, which is the subject of the kantei here. This daito also received Hozon papers. I will let this run for one week before posting the shinsa attribution. Any/all ideas are very welcome and much appreciated.

 

Nagasa: 28"

Sori: 3/4".

 

EDIT: Additional info

 

Motohaba: 2.8cm

Motokasane: 7.5mm

Sakihaba: 2cm

Sakikasane: 5.3mm

 

Tsukurikomi: Iori mune. Because of the bohi, I can't tell you anything regarding the shinogiji.

 

Hada: prominently and primarily o mokume, with some masame as Kunitaro san noted. No utsuri is seen.

 

No muneyaki.

 

Hamon: Noi deki suguha, with hada pattern clearly seen in the hamon, a lot of long, bright kinsuji and long, sweeping, dramatic sunagashi, especially in the monouchi. The hamon is wide towards the nakago and the kissaki, and thin (~3-4mm) in the 1/4 middle of the blade.

 

Boshi: The boshi is all intact and is hakikake - no kaeri that I can see.

 

 

If I am missing important pictures, please let me know.

 

Regards,

Hoanh

post-3198-14196884187016_thumb.jpg

post-3198-14196884188884_thumb.jpg

post-3198-14196884190903_thumb.jpg

post-3198-14196884193472_thumb.jpg

post-3198-14196884196701_thumb.jpg

post-3198-14196884199252_thumb.jpg

Posted

My gut-feel is:

 

 

ko-Uda.

 

 

And here are the reasons:

 

 

Hadamono jigane with loads of masame, thick nioi-guchi with sunagashi (do I see kinsuji?), hakikake boshi. Looks like a sword from Northern Japan, so Hoju is not a bad call.

 

Posted

Hi Bob,

 

Yes, it is indeed the blade!!! What is your kantei? I would be interested in hearing your opinion.

 

Regards,

Hoanh

Posted

Dear Hoanh san,

 

If you could give us some more (a lot of ) hints ?

as we can not see the features of this blade by only photos.

 

Motohaba, Sakihaba,Kasane.

Tsukurikomi (Mitsumune or iori mune, hight of mune, High shinogi or low shindig etc.,)

 

Jitetsu (i can see Itame nada with with mokume and almost Msame near Ha.)

How is Shinogi-ji ? (Masame or mixed with Mokume)

 

Is there Utsuri ? if so, what kind of Utsuri ?

Ji-nie ? or other activities ?

 

Hamon : Shape of Hamon, Nie-deki or Nioi-deki ? What kind of Nie ? How is Nioi-kuchi ? and other activities ?

 

Boshi : Shape of Boshi, Ko-maru? o-maru ? with Hakikane ? the shape of Kaeri and how long is the kaeri goes ?

 

Is there any Mune-yaki ?

 

we can not really see those activities by only photos.

 

When we have those hint, Kantei game become interesting.

 

Also, person who answer should say the reason why they think this answer. (Smith, school, province or period )

Some person can try to guess the smith, someone who try to guess "Shinto or Koto" depend on their own level.

When people answer with the reason, It will be educational for everybody.

and It is good study to understand NBTHK attribution.

Posted

Dear Kunitaro san and Mariusz,

 

I will get you the info later today. Thank you for the suggestions!!!

 

Regards,

Hoanh

Posted

Hi,

 

I edited the original post to include more info. If there is anything else you would like to know, please let me know. The replies posted so far are very educational and have given me a little window in each person's thinking.

 

Regards,

Hoanh

Posted

Hoanh. As I told you previously, I got some opinions about it being saiba and retempered. We have other threads about how koto can be retempered and still paper at the NBTHK. Did the NBTHK say anything about it? I couldn't find a mizukage and was never convinced that it was saiba. As to school, I'm afraid that my kantei skills are not enough to warrant even a well educated guess. Cheers, Bob

Posted

Hi Bob,

 

The Hozon papers should arrive in a few days. I don't have it in hands at the moment. But, in my communications with Bob Benson regarding the shinsa results, no mention of saiba was ever made. He would have told me if the blade were saiba. The shinsa attribution is pretty interesting. I must say I learned a lot. It forced me to do a whole lot of reading.

 

Regards,

Hoanh

Posted

Dear Kunitaro san,

 

I believe the Hozon attribution is to a particular line of smiths with a few generations and did not specify a particular generation. The attribution does not seem to be a school, as "den" is not part of the attribution.

 

Regards,

Hoanh

Posted

Hada and hataraki....I'd bid on Uda too. Not particularly Ko-Uda though...a little later. Kunihisa..Kunitomo...

That mokume is quite striking.

 

Brian

Posted

Hello:

Thank you Mariusz for the excellent discussion of den, ha and mon referenced from Darcy Brockbank's writings. It is really educational. If I could add a small gloss, probably applicable to either the Den as in Gokaden meaning, or the specification for an individual smith meaning, it would be to point out that it is usually taken as a negative comment when found on a paper, and that belief is so strong that it gets integrated into a somewhat lower price than were it not there for the same blade. The market interprets it as an introduction of uncertainty, and markets not liking uncertainty, the consequence is a discount. I cannot track down the reference, but if memory serves, Tanobe sensei once noted that while it implies a difference from the standard "ideal type", it was not necessarily bad, just different. That would seem to imply that if a smith achieved something nice, beyond the usual expectation of tradition or individual it could as easily be value adding as value reducing depending on what the difference is.

Arnold F.

  • Like 1
Posted

I think that the lower mekugi ana is the original one.

so, the sword is about 2 inches suriage. 75-76cm nagasa and 2.0-2.5cm sori.

and the mune side of nakago is greatly shaped for setting less Sori when the nakago is in tsuka.

To see/imagine the original sugata (sori), is to follow Mune line from top to middle, and follow Mume amd Shinogi line from middle to bottom and into nakago.

Because, ha-line and shinogi line of top half are changed by polishing.

It is for Period.

 

Hamon: Noi deki

 

Is it "Nioi-dei" or :Nie-deki" ?

It is for school (Gokaden).

Posted

Dear Kunitaro san,

 

As you can see in the pictures, there are lots of activities in the hamon. However, the nie are so fine that I think of them as nioi. So, I would say nioi deki. Sorry for the misspelling, Kunitaro san.

 

Regards,

Hoanh

Posted

Dear Hoanh san,

 

Thank you for your quick answer.

I just wanted to confirm the "deki"

"Nie-deki" or "Nioi-deki" is one of most important basic for Kantei.

 

To give good descriptions, you see the sword more,, and many people will enjoy kantei.

 

No "sorry" please :doubt:

Posted

Thank you Kunitaro san.

 

BUMP! I will be posting the NBTHK Origami tomorrow morning, so please post your thoughts, gentlemen.

 

Regards,

Hoanh

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...