Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Greetings.

I only wonder if it is tachi or is it Kodachi, because of the nagasa length.

It is listed as tachi. Sorry for my weird newbi question.

Regards,

Miha G.

Posted
  vlado said:
I only wonder if it is tachi or is it Kodachi, because of the nagasa length.

It is listed as tachi. Sorry for my weird newbi question.

 

Miha

I have catagorised it as a tachi blade because the nagasa exceeds 60 cm, the slim sugata siggests a tachi and it is signed tachi-mei. I believe would have been difficult to catagorise it in any other way. Don't be afraid of asking "wierd newbie questions"

Nice one Wah, I see that it was made one year before mine when he was a young man only 81 years old.

Regards

Clive Sinclaire

Posted
  Clive Sinclaire said:

Nice one Wah, I see that it was made one year before mine when he was a young man only 81 years old.

Regards

Clive Sinclaire

 

Clive, cant believe you no remember this one, you mentioned it in your sword register write up above ;)

Posted

Greetings.

Thanks for your reply mr. Clive Sinclaire, now I understand why tachi. ( nagasa exceeds 60 cm, the slim sugata siggests a tachi and it is signed tachi-mei ).

Thanks for the lesson and sharing yours knowledge.

 

Best regards,

 

Miha G.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...