Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Agreed The eBay tsuba was very much a copy - and falls far short of main school Jingo work in every way. Probably made by a tsuboi worker, a school which specialised in copying higo works for sale to samurai with not so deep pockets !

 

Kind regards

 

Michael

Posted

This, unfortunately, is an excellent example of where the purchase price could have just about bought the three book Ito set on Higo kodogu instead of wasting it on something worth a fraction of the purchase price.

Posted

Hi Grey D.,

 

The eBay tsuba has a really bad iron surface and the patina poorly done with no glossiness. Not what you would expect in a Jingo Higo tsuba.

 

 

 

Yours truly,

David Stiles

Posted

The winner of the auction is a newcomer with a deep pocket. He has been outbidding everyone on lots of tsuba that are nothing special, some with obvious forging flaws indicated in pictures as well as in the description :dunno: To each his own, I guess.

 

Hoanh

Posted

Hoanh, how can you tell the identity of the winning bidder or at least attribute to the winner of other auctions? It is listed as f****f. Are these pseudonyms consistent? Cheers, Bob

Posted

Bob,

 

The only thing one can do is look at the scrambled moniker and correlate it with the number of feedback the person has. If one gets a consistency between both the scrambled moniker *AND* the number of feedback, then it's most likely the same person. On top of that, if the person bids for the same type of item, say tsuba in this case, then it's another check sum test.

 

Regards,

Hoanh

Posted

Ouch.

Someone using their wallet for a flashlight instead of reading and looking for the light. Even expensive books are cheap in comparison. Wonder when this piece will surface at a show claiming to be Jingo? Everyone pays for their education in this hobby, one way or another......

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

The fact that it is on Andy's site does not necessarily confirm it is genuine.

 

Caveat emptor :bang:

 

Since it is listed now, we should refrain from comments, I guess.

Posted

No paper and just because someone scratched something on the ura a Jingo it does not make. Aside from this, Robert Haynes has been very forward about the Higo Kinko Taikan having modern pieces in it which were placed 'for sale'. Whether his assertion is true or not I do not know but put together I would expect validation in the form of Hozon paper before I plunked down $4000.

 

My two cents and worth whatever two cents is in this day and age.

Posted
The fact that it is on Andy's site does not necessarily confirm it is genuine.

 

I agree, but alas simply because a few NMB members seem to disapprove of it doesn't confirm that it is not.

Posted

I agree, but alas simply because a few NMB members seem to disapprove of it doesn't confirm that it is not.

 

Probably the fourteenth Jingo :rotfl:

Posted

Ed,

Very true. But one would think that a top work like that would have papers by now.

Also, if you look at some of the finishing off, and places like the inside top of the bag...you can see someone attempted something and didn't success.

Again, no proof it isn't. But less proof it is :)

 

Brian

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...