Soshin Posted April 16, 2024 Author Report Posted April 16, 2024 Just ideas about this tsuba that has long since left my collection. While the carving style is an old one seen sometimes in the Kamakura-bori style of tsuba the rim shape is very atypical of Kamakura-bori style tsuba as well as the other thickness of the tsuba. I now have two Kamakura-bori style tsuba in my collection and they have hugely different style rims and very thin plates. The carving and along the rim are also not seen in Kamakura-bori style tsuba. The gold inlayed eyes are also not something seen in Kamakura-bori style tsuba. The plain Higo call to that tsuba means the NBTHK was not able to put the tsuba into one of the five main schools of Higo Provience (Kamiyoshi, Hayashi, Nishigaki, and Jingo). There were other independent artists working in Higo Province both professionally and as a side hobby while being samurai during the Edo Period. Of these five main schools of Higo Provience my old tsuba shows most similarities with the Jingo School. 2 Quote
MauroP Posted April 16, 2024 Report Posted April 16, 2024 On 4/16/2024 at 11:12 AM, Soshin said: The gold inlayed eyes are also not something seen in Kamakura-bori style tsuba. Expand There is a counterexample for everything (in tōsōgu speculation, at least...), that's why basically I'm no more interested in attribution to school, provided one consider it no more than a fun game (like recognize incense flavours). 2 Quote
Winchester Posted April 16, 2024 Report Posted April 16, 2024 On the above example, which David posted and Mauro shared for additional commentary, the eyes on this tsuba are brass. The later example--and subject of the post--is later and the eyes are gold. I think they are cool, regardless of 1400's-1800's and just like the style. Just so rarely see them, let alone for sale. 1 Quote
Spartancrest Posted April 17, 2024 Report Posted April 17, 2024 Another from the Varshavsky site = He has doubled up with the guard from "Kamakura-bori tsuba with design of a dragon. Muromachi period, c. 1450." and the same guard sold later from the "Professor A. Z. Freeman and the Phyllis Sharpe Memorial collections №36, pp. 18-19." and is once again the second guard as posted by Mauro above https://varshavskyco...ist&product_count=54 Quote
Soshin Posted April 17, 2024 Author Report Posted April 17, 2024 On 4/16/2024 at 8:16 PM, MauroP said: There is a counterexample for everything (in tōsōgu speculation, at least...), that's why basically I'm no more interested in attribution to school, provided one consider it no more than a fun game (like recognize incense flavours). Expand All three examples basically support the point I was trying to make. Time to move on and talk about other things. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.