Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello, I would like to ask experts about this sword.

There is no signature on the handle.

Can anyone date the blade? How old could be the sword, is it a ww2 machine made sword or prewar one fitted to Shing Gunto standard during 1935-1945?

post-4372-1419685205652_thumb.jpg

post-4372-14196852060927_thumb.jpg

post-4372-14196852067196_thumb.jpg

post-4372-14196852071521_thumb.jpg

post-4372-14196852074071_thumb.jpg

post-4372-14196852079355_thumb.jpg

Posted

Tom,

 

Definitely traditionally made. Pic 17 shows a hamon, but you will have to control the lighting and angle a little more to get a better picture. The shape and the nakago suggest no older than shinshinto. Other than that, I don't have anything else to add.

 

Regards,

Hoanh

Posted

While I'd always take Chris' opinion over mine, but I'd vote low grade gendaito. I seem to see some light activity in the a couple of the pics but as Chris said, the pics aren't completely conclusive and there are others that show a lifeless showato.

Posted

I'm inclined toward oil quenched WW2 period too from what I see.

 

The presence of a hamon, such as has been pointed out in pic 17, doesn't confirm traditionally made.

 

Regards,

Stu

Posted

IMO (very humble opinion) the nakago is well shaped for a nameless traditional war blade. Also (and I may just be seeing things) I noticed some traditional folds and what looked like nie swirls in a few places. Things I have not noticed in oil Tempered blades. May be a step up.

Posted

The presence of a hamon, such as has been pointed out in pic 17, doesn't confirm traditionally made.

Of course it can't confirm it, but the hamon that I am seeing there certainly points me more towards Gendaito than Showato. I would have it checked out further.

 

Brian

Posted

Cant really say. Your pictures are not very good, and it would need to be shown much better. If it is oil quenched mass produced a couple hundred to a bit more if all the Gunto dress is in good shape. If a standard decent Gendaito then depending on the polish and condition could be worth a lil bit.

Posted

Tom,

 

Your blade seems to be in good shape, except for what looks like an umegane in pic 5.jpg. The scabbard is not exactly desirable, although the tsuka is in good shape. I would guess may be $700.

 

Regards,

Hoanh

Posted

Since I don`t own the sword yet I don`t have better pics, but I can post closeups from better resolution pictures.

IMO from what I see on the photos the sword is made from folded steel, but I might be wrong.

post-4372-14196852459599_thumb.jpg

post-4372-14196852463047_thumb.jpg

post-4372-14196852466356_thumb.jpg

post-4372-14196852469485_thumb.jpg

post-4372-14196852476059_thumb.jpg

Posted

I can't see any hada in the ji. What appears to be hada in the hamon looks more like the graining seen in blades made with railroad steel. There have been some explanations of this here and there but I do not have a reference handy at the moment. Try a google search or maybe someone else will chime in.

Posted
I can't see any hada in the ji. What appears to be hada in the hamon looks more like the graining seen in blades made with railroad steel. There have been some explanations of this here and there but I do not have a reference handy at the moment. Try a google search or maybe someone else will chime in.

 

So you think that blade is rather forged from railroad steel and not folded?

Posted

Again, I can't say for certain because of the photos, but from what I can see it appears to me to be an oil quenched, possibly forged out from railroad steel. I see no hada in the ji, and what hada I see in the hamon looks more like the graining seen in railroad steel. The hamon is diffuse without any nie that I can see, hallmarks of an oil quench, non-tamahagane steel.

Posted

Tom,

 

A nagasa of 25" is not atypical for WWII-mounted swords. The weight seems to be on the high side for this length, though. Does that weight include the tsuka or not?

 

Hoanh

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...