Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't know. Could be the picture quality but something about the mei/yasurimei/nakago does not look right. The yasurimei looks too uniform/deep. And the mei (though I could be wrong looks like gibberish at first glance).

 

I hope I'm wrong but are you sure it's not a chinese fake?

 

mike

Posted

I'm going to go with "not traditional nihonto". The lines don't look right. Having been buffed, this could alter things but the nakago and mei (which I think reads "something, DAI MASA?") just don't look right.

 

My 2 cents. Hope I'm wrong. Can you post a pict of the entire nakago?

 

mike

Posted

eugene walton,

 

The sword look mumei to me...the signature is added on later....Someone thought it could sell better if there is a mei go on the tang. He/she could add the signature on the tang.. That is my opinion.

 

Quang

Posted

could this be a Paul Chen, or similar sword? the width of the nakago looks strange when compared with the blade width (reminds me of Hankei ). The blade looks better than a modern Chinese copy but some of the "martial arts" practical swords i have seen have temper and reasonable shape.

 

Mark Jones

Posted

The rust pattern isn't at all consistent, either, so I doubt that it's "real" by Nihonto standards. The mei also looks almost too perfect, even if I can't translate it.

 

I wonder why anyone would try to disguise/mimic/masquerade a sword with an otherwise authentic-looking nagasa?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...