steve69au Posted August 1, 2012 Report Posted August 1, 2012 Hi I just picked up a sword in WW2 mount that is signed Hizen no Kuni ju Ichimonji Hiroto im told its hiroto 1740 2nd generation school of hizen tadayoshi it unokubi-zukuri with suguha hamon so im told would love to know if the translation i was given is right can anyone point me it the right direction to find out more about it Quote
Grey Doffin Posted August 1, 2012 Report Posted August 1, 2012 Translation is correct. Hawley's lists 2 generations: 1st working 1711-20, son of Hiroyuki, also signed Yoshisumi, and 2nd working 1736-43. Oshigata I have in my books show the Shodai; I have none of the Nidai. Your sword looks right. Grey Quote
cabowen Posted August 1, 2012 Report Posted August 1, 2012 Doesn't look like unokubi zukuri to me....plain old shinogi zukuri. Quote
steve69au Posted August 1, 2012 Author Report Posted August 1, 2012 from my understanding it is unokubi zukuri starts 2 inches from tsuba and runs down 10 inches added a another photo shows it better Quote
Jussi Ekholm Posted August 1, 2012 Report Posted August 1, 2012 Sesko's Index has 2nd generation working in Genbun (1736-1741), Hizen province, signed Hizen Ichimonji Fujiwara Hiroto, Hizen no Kuni Musashi no Daijo Hiroto, civilian name Hashimoto Chu'emon. He was son of the 2nd gen. Hizen Kanehiro, he died in the third year of Kanpo (1743). Unfortunately I haven't got more info on the Nidai as most information seems to be of Shodai. But those with more knowledge about Hizen can hopefully help you. Quote
cabowen Posted August 1, 2012 Report Posted August 1, 2012 from my understanding it is unokubi zukuri starts 2 inches from tsuba and runs down 10 inches added a another photo shows it better Didn't see that in the original photos....Not shinogi-zukuri....My apologies. Quote
Baka Gaijin Posted August 3, 2012 Report Posted August 3, 2012 Morning all, I'm interested in the Unokubi area, as I've seen similar with a short deep Hi in this position. Was this done to facilitate better balance in the blade? Cheers Quote
Kam Posted August 3, 2012 Report Posted August 3, 2012 I am very curious on what thoughts others have about this but from my perspective I am aware of this being done along with bohi and decorative horimono to disguise or remove flaws. On 2 occasions I have seen blades leave for Japan only upon return one had a Fudo myo horimono where a huge lamination was and in the other instance deep pitting was removed by method of Bohi. I am by no means suggesting that this is the case, although from a Kenjutsu point of view this type of weight reduction would make it tip heavy. In saying this I had a Wakizashi that looked very similar. . . will hunt done some pics. Kam Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.