hudomeld
-
Posts
34 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by hudomeld
-
As far as i read not many Moriie gimei out there...
-
Thats what i thought too.. for kamakura.. it is in a too good shape
-
-
I really dont know where to position it.. For my -completely untrained- eyes the nakago looks older than shinshinto forgot to mention the sori is 2,6cm
-
Sorry for hiding the mei.. I really did not want to have the blade judged by the mei.. Myself i think it is no way the Moriie mei could be authentic.. I also did not buy it because of the mei..
-
Hello all, Recently i purchased a tachi.. It is signed but i think it is irrelevant at first.. later on i will reveal it of course.. Nagasa 75cm Ubu nakago Blade 29mm and 19mm at kissaki Thickness 7 and 5mm At this point i really would appreciate your experienced oppinion about the age from the sugata, jihada and jigane as well as hamon.. Many thanks in advance David
-
Many thanks!
-
I thought so... Other question.. As for the shape and appearance of the blade am i wrong when i guess it to be made in the muromachi era?
-
Hey there, many thanks accepting me in the forum. I am not at all an expert here, just starting with Japanese art.. I saw a blade whith a mei as in the photos.. It says kunihiro tsukuru Indeed Horikawa kunihiro signed mostly without tsukuru.. but there is one known example which is certified as he's work with this mei.. May i ask you dear members to help me out with your oppinion on that mei.. can it be kunihiro horikawa or not.. Many thanks in advance Regards David
