As stated in the OP, I'm aware the chance this was actually made by Yasuyo is slight.
In particular the 2nd to last kanji seems very incorrect to me.
By "authentic" I just mean - traditionally made Japanese sword.
If it was just a cheap forgery, then that probably would not justify restoration.
I am curious to discover why someone would sign their work as someone else though.
If this is in fact a traditionally made sword, then one can be sure the smith, whoever he was, underwent a lot of training and effort to learn his craft.
It's strange that they would go through so much for their work and then sign it as someone else.
I guess what I'm saying is I'd just like to know as much of this sword's story as possible.