I recently purchased this katana from Aoi Art: https://sword-auction.com/en/product/20194/as20427-katana-yoshi-transmitted-as-aoe-school-青江nbthk-tokubetsu-hozon-token/
As stated, it has a partial gold mei and NBTHK appraised it as Aoe school. I asked Aoi Art to arrange for a Tanobe sayagaki. Aoi Art just relayed this to me from Mr. Tanobe after his examination:
Mr. Tanobe judged this sword to be top-class Ko Mihara Masaie, not Aoe.
He said that this sword looks really similar to the Juyo Bijutsu Ko Mihara Masaie.
So he does not want to write the Sayagaki as Aoe.
If you want to get his Sayagaki and new NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon paper, we have to remove the gold signature completely and re-register the sword.
It would take a lot of time (at least a year) and cost.
There is no guarantee that it will be Ko Mihara Masaie because Mr. Tanobe and NBTHK have different views.
In any case, Mr. Tanobe praised this sword as a rare good one.
So, here's my dilemma. Do I ask that the sayagaki be done as Ko Mihara Masaie and have it different than the HBTHK appraisal (if Mr. Tanobe is willing to do it) or do I try to have it reappraised with the removed mei? If going through the time and effort of removing the mei and reappraisal, why not try for Juyo rather than reappraising Tokubetsu Hozon, which it already has? I lean toward the first option, as I greatly value Mr. Tanobe's opinion, it would not require messing with the sword, and it would get to me more quickly. But I am mindful that one day I (or my heirs) will need to sell this sword and am I better off taking the time now to hopefully (but no guarantee) align the appraisals or even shoot for Juyo?
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Adam