Jump to content

Conway S

Gold Tier
  • Posts

    305
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Conway S last won the day on March 11 2023

Conway S had the most liked content!

About Conway S

Profile Information

  • Location:
    USA
  • Interests
    Imperial Japanese Swords - Primarily kai gunto and parade swords of all varieties

Profile Fields

  • Name
    Conway S

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Conway S's Achievements

Community Regular

Community Regular (8/14)

  • One Year In
  • Very Popular Rare
  • Dedicated
  • Reacting Well
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

271

Reputation

  1. Here's another "1" on the mune of a Taguchi Masatsugu along with the double "ho" stamps. Date is April (uzuki) 1943. No star stamp.
  2. Gifu stamp appears on swords from 1930s, but 1931 is too early. Conway
  3. The title was a reference to this Yahoo JP seller who previously listed a sword they claimed belonged to Hideki Tojo. It was not intended as a racial slur. Understandable that poor phrasing could cause confusion. But then again, who would come to this forum to disrespect Japanese? Conway
  4. David, Maybe it's obvious to you, but the scabbard is for a Type 3, whereas the rest of the mounts are Type 98.
  5. Maurice, I was thinking Watanabe Masanobu - 渡辺正延. Take a look on the forum and you will see signatures for this smith vary greatly. Maybe I am way off though.... Conway
  6. The bottom mark is an anchor within sakura. More examples posted on page 47 of this thread. Conway
  7. David, Here is the link to Sesko’s Swordsmiths of Japan. E Swordsmiths of Japan Conway
  8. Edward, Nice find. You correct in assuming this one has been depot refurbished during its service. The "0" is a clear indication. As you may have already read, the date is usually stamped on the guard where the current markings are found. In addition to the 小, the other markings are seal script inspection marks, which may correlate to an individual inspector. The undated guards are typically earlier production. The scabbard throat piece on this example is also less common. Here is a great link with lots of solid info on Type 32s and other military swords: http://ohmura-study.net/962.html Conway
  9. Does anyone know what the "1" signifies? Is it an inspector's mark?
  10. Steve, This sword was discussed on the forum in December. I wouldn't trust that it's a "gendaito" just because the seller states that. Many of these RJT smiths also made non-traditionally made swords as well.
  11. Looks like the nakago has not been shortened based on the photos. Other Kanenao examples like this in souvenir koshirae on Pg. 95 and Pg. 96 of "Japanese NAVAL SWORDS WW2 Swordsmiths & Workshops" by Mal Cox. Conway
  12. The green tsuka ito appears from time to time. I’ve seen quite a few on Iijima swords. I guess a question it raises for me is whether the tsuka for Type 95s were made in-house by the subcontractors or provided from an external supplier. Conway
  13. David, It looks to be signed Takai 高井Sadatsugu 貞継. Conway
  14. Fredrik, The smith is 兼則 Kanenori. There is an article in the NMB downloads section with more information on him. The date is May 1943. Conway
  15. Sam, Personally, I’d say $300 -$500 depending on the condition and whether it’s a field grade or company grade sword. There’s so many plain company grade swords of poor workmanship out there so it’s nice to have a more unique example. But that’s just my opinion as someone who’s a bit addicted to parade swords. Someone else who just wants one to complete their collection might not pay that much, but they also might not recognize the interesting historical context. Conway
×
×
  • Create New...