Matsunoki

What I find surprising is that a collector/dealer did not notice a chip to the kissaki mune…..the kissaki is one of the first things you look at very closely. Also the mune ware are clearly visible…ok, not massive but they are there. That rust looks to have pitting, ok again not a massive area but does not look a few weeks old imo, especially as the sword was shipped oiled. And afaik an Iai koshirae is not an assembly of Frankenstein adapted parts but one that can be safely used for Iai As said above….lessons to be learned by both parties. A dealers reputation is hard won and easily lost. Buyers have to ignore all the sales BS and focus on asking the questions that are not answered in descriptions. Bottom line…..if you are going to buy from images you’d better know and be able to trust the seller. ……and the best way to deal with a rightfully aggrieved customer is to apologise and refund his money….as Alex says above. But then I’m very “old school” with an exaggerated sense of transparency and fair play.

The Birmingham Arms Fair is coming up (14th June) so here are some poor images of assorted kozuka that I will be taking (Table 81) Mei include Goto, Hamano, Issando Joi, Hirata (the incredibly rare enamelled tigers) etc. Quality ranges from “OK” to very fine (imo🙂) Hope to see some of you there. All the best. Colin

I am just a beginner on armour so this is just an unreliable opinion. Others on here will hopefully chime in. To me this looks a genuine un-messed with Edo era armour however the condition, especially the Kabuto and Menpo is pretty rough and unrestorable without considerable expenditure. It would require specialist knowledge and ability to fix it. The sleeve lacquer looks badly damaged also. Given that the bulk of the value usually rests on the Kabuto and Menpo it is not something to go mad on$ I’m interested to hear what others say….so don’t rely on what I’ve said🙂

These menuki look cast and then hand finished…imo.

Hi Grev Was he talking about mercurial gilding? That is indeed a lost process mostly because it can kill the user due to the release of mercury vapour during the firing process.

Yep, it is Chinese. Well outside of my knowledge! Looks old but the Chinese are masters of ageing things including ivory.

As Piers suggests……. “Signature” is not a Japanese one. Crudely carved and awkwardly orientated. The underside is not finished to Japanese standards. Can we see the okimono please? I feel this could be Mammoth tusk.

Not quite the same as our local horsetail grass but if it’s the same family…..it gets used in cosmetics for skin and hair. Perhaps I should try it 🙂

Sometimes it is not the importance or rarity of an object that warrants restoration or saving but it most definitely is the pleasure and peace that so doing brings. Reward of a different kind.

Bob and I have discussed this elsewhere but just to be clear this is definitely not shibayama mei or work as @Bugyotsuji correctly infers.

Piers, can you make it a bit trickier next time?🙂

Mario, I have sent you a private message if you have a few minutes. Colin

Arghhh, I can’t play ……don’t know what a Genbu is (without cheating) Guess….something to do with one having a very hairy tail (minogame) that the other does not?

Congratulations…..a beautiful collection. Eagles, hawks, tigers, dragons……evocative powerful images.

……….the proud new owner of these comes on here asking for opinions?☹️ https://www.the-saleroom.com/en-gb/auction-catalogues/lawrences-auctioneers-of-crewkerne/catalogue-id-srlawre10245/lot-a702559b-d2ea-481e-afb4-b43500bfb46e or https://www.the-saleroom.com/en-gb/auction-catalogues/lawrences-auctioneers-of-crewkerne/catalogue-id-srlawre10245/lot-a483c013-6d87-4afd-83ea-b43500bfb46e ….and others in the same sale all with misleading descriptions.