Jump to content

Franco

Members
  • Posts

    934
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Franco

  1. Actually, it is not. From personal experience, I had an Echizen Rai Kuniyasu that was polished in Japan. Over the first 6 months I followed the polisher's care instructions precisely. Which included using uchiko. Over those 6 months the detail and activity continued becoming more and more vivid. In fact, this sword was shown twice to our study group over that time. Upon which our late friend Arnold Frenzel commented aloud "where did all that ashi come from." Where indeed! Now, having said that, I was given very similar care instructions using uchiko for a sword I had polished after that. I've chosen not to follow the uchiko path on this other sword. Why? Polisher's uchiko will not scratch when used absolutely correctly. However, it will absolutely leave fine scratches if it is not used absolutely correctly. Since I do not trust myself to be using uchiko absolutely correctly over 100% of the sword, I choose not to use it. Additionally, I've watched two different polishers uchiko my swords and neither one left a scratch on either sword. In any case, old, new, times are a changing. Microdear cloth and anhydrous alcohol works just fine. Regards
  2. The problem isn't looking at the Juyo Morisuke, in fact not at all. Would love to see it. The problem for some is that their eye can't stop being drawn to the chip. Regards
  3. While location can have some variation in the ones I've seen, the characteristics including shape, angle, and depth are unmistakable as to what made that mark.
  4. Having seen a number of Nambokucho period blades with real kirikomi, I would consider what I'm seeing here as romanticized flaws of suspicious origin. Some collectors can live with flaws. Buy what you like, but know what you're buying.
  5. Fyi, https://nihonto.com/the-ichimonji-school-一文字派/
  6. Years ago I looked at a mumei tanto that was in much worse shape than this piece appears to be in, damaged tip, and heavy rust. Only it had a small window opened up which showed quality. So, I bought it and it polished out just fine. If a sword has foundations issues choosing the right polisher becomes even more critical. Regards
  7. The shape of this oshigata sword has significant differences to my eye. So, while lengths may be similar, time frames of manufacture are not. One reason lengths may be similar is that later swords were attempting to copy earlier examples.
  8. Juyo swords can have fatal flaws. I do not know whether or not a fatal flaw will be noted in the origami. When it comes to nihonto it's never easy. Regards
  9. Hi Ray, What is the shape of the mune? Thank you. Regards
  10. Congratulations. Looks like a sword worthy of consideration for a top polish at some point. Regards
  11. My guess; Shape + boshi + not polished down + nakago patina > Edo (probably Shinto) period sword Regards
  12. Unfortunately, these appear to be lower level production work. Which makes it very difficult to determine who made these unless someone has prior experience seeing similar work. Regards
  13. My guess at this point would be Shinshinto or newer (meiji period). Perhaps not water quenched. Regards
  14. No worries. Actually, it is a good topic to raise as there are all too often misconceptions that need to be challenged and more carefully thought through. Regards
  15. Not really. While not absolutely full proof, the securest way to ship a sword in the U.S. has always been via USPS registered mail. Why? It's because the package first of all must be wrapped according to standard, so that all seams can be stamped with a seal to deter tampering. Next, the package then travels under lock and key the entire way and must be signed for by everyone that handles that package in addition to being tracked the entire trip. The package must be signed for at the time of delivery. Travel time is considerably longer (and it costs much more) than it used to be now that Trump appointed and Biden kept De Joy who is running things. None the less, it is, or at least was, the safest/secure way to ship. The second safest way to ship a sword is/was via overnight USPS Express mail when it is guaranteed to arrive the next day by a given time. Why? The package is tracked and must be signed for, and it doesn't sit around waiting for prying eyes. Each post office has a cutoff time for express mail. If one arrives ready to go just before that cutoff time that also ensures the package isn't sitting around for long. Do not ship the package if next day isn't guaranteed. Again, nothing is full proof. Regards
  16. https://www.militaria.co.za/nmb/topic/8456-katana-with-bo-hi/ Here we go again. Please explain to me how the function of an I-beam applies/transfers to the function of nihonto and a cutting activity. Is the sword carrying a load? Regards
  17. Are you applying this comment to all Japanese swords or just limiting it to swords with core steel construction? Regards
  18. Could you please tell us which USPS service was used? Registered mail? Express? Other? Thank you. Regards
  19. I would seek the advice of a polisher and perhaps even their services in this matter and consider it a lesson learned. Nihonto should be carefully examined and wiped clean every time they are out before being put away house guests or not. Uchiko used improperly will scratch. A quartz halogen light will show the scratches. Regards
  20. Colin, I am aware. When flaws become worse with each passing view ..... Koto? Shinto? Shinshinto? , exactly! Somebody has been playing games with this sword. Regards
  21. Colin, After having gone back over all the images again, there isn't a single image that doesn't show problems/flaws. Fatal flaws? No. But certainly not acceptable for this sword. Even the surface of the sword is showing signs of being over polished. That, and for me this alternate shaped kissaki should be considered a flaw. Plus, the bo-hi - mei , looks to me like somebody has definitely been monkeying around there. Either the mei was added or the bo-hi. One would have to look carefully to see how the edge of where the mei and bo-hi come together look. Which came first? It's not even clear to me that this entire sword wasn't made with the intention of fooling. But, I could be completely wrong. Regards Don't be a pink paper Japanese sword collector!
  22. The nakago looks fine as is. Having said that, if there are concerns about elevated humidity levels a very light touch of sword oil on the nakago is fine. Apply with fingers and "dab" it dry (do not rub!), so that there is barely a light film of oil, nothing more. Regards
  23. It is difficult to imagine that any sword smith would sign a sword with so many problems as this sword has. Give that some careful thought. Regardless of which came first the chicken or the cracked eggs, this sword has been monkeyed with and not for the better. Regards
  24. Possibly. Is this bohi ato bori? How much has this sword been polished down? The answers will/may shed light on the history of this sword. Regards p.s. prego, niente
  25. The boshi looks to be sliver thin and the shape of the kissaki reworked which points to having previously been damaged. That in addition to the other flaws already being discussed. Shinto swords should be signed, ubu, with no flaws from a collectible perspective. Regards
×
×
  • Create New...