Franco D

Fyi, https://nihonto.com/the-ichimonji-school-一文字派/

Years ago I looked at a mumei tanto that was in much worse shape than this piece appears to be in, damaged tip, and heavy rust. Only it had a small window opened up which showed quality. So, I bought it and it polished out just fine. If a sword has foundations issues choosing the right polisher becomes even more critical. Regards

The shape of this oshigata sword has significant differences to my eye. So, while lengths may be similar, time frames of manufacture are not. One reason lengths may be similar is that later swords were attempting to copy earlier examples.

Juyo swords can have fatal flaws. I do not know whether or not a fatal flaw will be noted in the origami. When it comes to nihonto it's never easy. Regards

Hi Ray, What is the shape of the mune? Thank you. Regards

Congratulations. Looks like a sword worthy of consideration for a top polish at some point. Regards

My guess; Shape + boshi + not polished down + nakago patina > Edo (probably Shinto) period sword Regards

Unfortunately, these appear to be lower level production work. Which makes it very difficult to determine who made these unless someone has prior experience seeing similar work. Regards

My guess at this point would be Shinshinto or newer (meiji period). Perhaps not water quenched. Regards

No worries. Actually, it is a good topic to raise as there are all too often misconceptions that need to be challenged and more carefully thought through. Regards

Not really. While not absolutely full proof, the securest way to ship a sword in the U.S. has always been via USPS registered mail. Why? It's because the package first of all must be wrapped according to standard, so that all seams can be stamped with a seal to deter tampering. Next, the package then travels under lock and key the entire way and must be signed for by everyone that handles that package in addition to being tracked the entire trip. The package must be signed for at the time of delivery. Travel time is considerably longer (and it costs much more) than it used to be now that Trump appointed and Biden kept De Joy who is running things. None the less, it is, or at least was, the safest/secure way to ship. The second safest way to ship a sword is/was via overnight USPS Express mail when it is guaranteed to arrive the next day by a given time. Why? The package is tracked and must be signed for, and it doesn't sit around waiting for prying eyes. Each post office has a cutoff time for express mail. If one arrives ready to go just before that cutoff time that also ensures the package isn't sitting around for long. Do not ship the package if next day isn't guaranteed. Again, nothing is full proof. Regards

https://www.militaria.co.za/nmb/topic/8456-katana-with-bo-hi/ Here we go again. Please explain to me how the function of an I-beam applies/transfers to the function of nihonto and a cutting activity. Is the sword carrying a load? Regards

Are you applying this comment to all Japanese swords or just limiting it to swords with core steel construction? Regards

Could you please tell us which USPS service was used? Registered mail? Express? Other? Thank you. Regards

I would seek the advice of a polisher and perhaps even their services in this matter and consider it a lesson learned. Nihonto should be carefully examined and wiped clean every time they are out before being put away house guests or not. Uchiko used improperly will scratch. A quartz halogen light will show the scratches. Regards

Colin, I am aware. When flaws become worse with each passing view ..... Koto? Shinto? Shinshinto? , exactly! Somebody has been playing games with this sword. Regards

Colin, After having gone back over all the images again, there isn't a single image that doesn't show problems/flaws. Fatal flaws? No. But certainly not acceptable for this sword. Even the surface of the sword is showing signs of being over polished. That, and for me this alternate shaped kissaki should be considered a flaw. Plus, the bo-hi - mei , looks to me like somebody has definitely been monkeying around there. Either the mei was added or the bo-hi. One would have to look carefully to see how the edge of where the mei and bo-hi come together look. Which came first? It's not even clear to me that this entire sword wasn't made with the intention of fooling. But, I could be completely wrong. Regards Don't be a pink paper Japanese sword collector!

The nakago looks fine as is. Having said that, if there are concerns about elevated humidity levels a very light touch of sword oil on the nakago is fine. Apply with fingers and "dab" it dry (do not rub!), so that there is barely a light film of oil, nothing more. Regards

It is difficult to imagine that any sword smith would sign a sword with so many problems as this sword has. Give that some careful thought. Regardless of which came first the chicken or the cracked eggs, this sword has been monkeyed with and not for the better. Regards

Possibly. Is this bohi ato bori? How much has this sword been polished down? The answers will/may shed light on the history of this sword. Regards p.s. prego, niente

The boshi looks to be sliver thin and the shape of the kissaki reworked which points to having previously been damaged. That in addition to the other flaws already being discussed. Shinto swords should be signed, ubu, with no flaws from a collectible perspective. Regards

Looks to be Edo period based on shape. Can't tell much else through the steel wool polish. Don't mess with the patina on the nakago. You can research the shape of nakago-jiri to narrow down tradition/school possibilities. That ware at the edge of the hamon could be the reason this sword is not signed. Regards

Based on the verbal description posted in the above comment what is being described is an early Muromachi Bingo Mihara sword. Which can be a very nice sword with much to appreciate. However, written above we have "A Mid Muromachi Period" vs an "Early Muromachi Period Bingo Mihara School." Which are not the same. Which is it? Plus, no description of boshi and turnback? Shape wise to my eye this is not early. Buy what you like, but know what you're buying. Return policy? Regards

Greatly appreciated! Thank you. Regards

Jacques, 1. I would love to cite the source placing the use of "core steel" in the late Heian period. However; A. the computer with that information is now gone, and, B. that, along with almost half of my nihonto library including the copy of the magazine article about the use of core steel in the Heian period is now gone as well after having retired from collecting and downsized. 3. I can't recall the name of the sword forum where the conversation took place about when the use of core steel began other than remembering it had an affiliation with Guido Schiller, and the conversation was with someone from Italy, perhaps with a Carlo T., if memory serves. If the website still exists perhaps the conversation could be tracked down. I can't even remember my sign in name any longer. 4. Regardless, we're not going to get a more reliable source than the Japanese polisher who told me he polished a sword from the 1100's that had what he termed as a ladder type construction showing when asked what the earliest sword was he had seen with core steel showing. None the less, I will continue searching for answers. https://markussesko....i-2-jigane-jihada-1/ Regards