hale1940

unfortunately I now believe that these posts I found are a scam. Likely got the pics from the craigslist posts you originally were talking about.

Thank you Bruce! Its nice to stop by. Its an excellent forum. May I ask, what area were these craigslists pics from? And were they in the same style?

Here is another Type 98 being sold by the same guy in my area. This one is described as being signed by ‘Seki Kanenobu’ and as traditionally made. It has an interesting stamp on the blade as well and a leather cover. Any feedback is much appreciated!

thanks for quick reply David. do you believe this would actually be a proper nihonto or a gendaito using non-traditional techniques? and if any of my terminology is incorrect please let me know. Its been a while since I’ve been in the sword game haha.

Hey there! Been a long time since I’ve been around. Hope this forum is doing well. Recently this Type 98 came up for sale near me. I’m interested to get so far more experienced eyes on it and see what yall think. The seller’s description says it was made by Minamoto Akikane in 1928 and its ‘traditionally made’. Any thoughts and opinions are greatly appreciated.

Wow. I really don't have much to add other than I really hope this threat continues. Really interesting stuff.

here is another descriptor photo the seller has... and he is asking about 1600 USD

I mean, that could be the one! But I'm even less of a Kanji expert then you Bruce (I'm more like an inexpert lol). My friend is curious as to what you guys also the think of the blade regardless of the mei, at least from what you can see, I know the pictures aren't amazing.

Any particular Kaneuji you thinking most likely?

Hey there, Posting this sword for a friend who is curious about it. Its being advertised as a nice Gendaito with a ko-choji hamon. Comes with a company grade tassel as well. But, unfortunately there is corrosion on the nakago that covers most of the mei. Would love to hear your opinions of it and if anyone can make anything of the mei. thanks for any feedback!

This is a really cool piece. Nice find.

Hey guys, As usual thanks for all of your input! I figured there wouldn't be any simple answer, but this is an area I want to start investigating more. I've searched this forum for info on Takehisa but haven't been able to find out too much more about him. Interestingly, it seems like anytime his swords come up they are from 1943. At least from what I've seen. JP that book you mentioned seems like a good read and kinda what I'm looking for, I'll have to pick up a copy in not too long here.

Hey there guys, I've been kind of curious about something. Some of you may have seen my post about my 1943 Takehisa Type 98 I picked up recently. Looking at the sword and reading on this forum has got we wondering about something... What kind of environment would a sword like mine have been forged in? Would a sword smith like Takehisa have likely owned his own small shop or would he have more likely just been one worker in a larger shop with other sword smiths? And do we know what sort of manufacturing method were used for most war time Type 98's? Any feedback is greatly appreciated!

Thanks for all the info Bruce. As usual I appreciate it!

Hey Bruce! So is that what that back paint is, a number? 107? also the sarute is not the clasped hand type, just plain curved bar. I think when the pervious owner added it when he added the tassel. two questions. What are our thoughts on the use of the W stamp? And also, do we know of any more information about Takehisa of the methods he used for making his swords? thanks!