Hello Dave,
Thanks for the link you posted. I'm going read that carefully, since it seems to provide an interesting hint on the reason of the hamon-shape of Koua isshin tou.
Regarding the book Modern Japanese Swords and Swordsmiths that you and Christian mentionned, especially the part you posted, these are informations I'd really take carefully because - as I can see - the authors don't mention any source. This could lead to such statements as the one we find on Mantetsu tou in Fuller & Gregory, Military Swords of Japan 1968-1945, The Bath Press: 1997, p. 78:
"These blades were forged by inserting [...] into a Manchurian-made or western steel (often scrap railway lines)."
Ohmura, based on original sources, seems clearly to say that this is wrong...
My point is: if the methodology of the authors is bad, the informations can't be checked but just be taken for granted.